Kudos on the King Ralph reference!!There have always been monarchs without children, or monarchs without legitimate children. Elizabeth I anyone?! Just because of this new televised ‘fairness’ that is going around, the LoS shouldn’t be messed with. I don’t wish to speculate about children, if someone is gay and does not have a child as an heir there will be someone else to step in. It’s not quite King Ralph.
If the kids are surrogates (if they exist #flatpack) I think the RF put them in LoS thinking it didn’t matter because Cambridges and they had no proof as she obfuscated the births and they couldn’t divulge her medical privacy. This was a mistake. They should have just left it not updated on the website.
King Ralph is an under appreciated gem of film ridiculousness.