Because Tyler Perry is such a gruesomes fan I am wondering how he is going to portray the British people in the Bradford movie.
Is it being filmed later this month.
Harry & Meghan #309 This pair are so twisted & bitter and now their approval rating is down the sh*tter
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Is it being filmed later this month.
I am guessing that the "heirs of the body" requirement will be modified in the next years/decades?
Mainly because of the possibility of a gay King.
Curious, what do you all think?
Mainly because of the possibility of a gay King.
Curious, what do you all think?
it certain drove home the fact that none of her family was invited... which I applaud. It also made them look like thirsty trash trying to mooch onto their now famous sister, but so be it. made people side-eye her invitation choices.
This is what I think as well @Sushex. In fact, you can count on the fact they they have been sought out by various media members here in the US 'cuz that's how it works here. The Ragland's silence speaks volumes. I respect them for it.
I also think this - I’m sure they both regarded Charles as a bottomless piggy bank. But even though he’s clearly very rich, I don’t think he has nearly the cash freedom people assume he has. The Duchy of Cornwall makes around £20m surplus profit but out of that he was paying 300 odd staff, his personal household but also all his charities lot. I can see that eating at least 10m easy, even 11 or 12 or more. Then £5m was being split between his sons to fund their work and living costs. I assume he gives to charity too and presumably saves some so it’s easy to see how a £1m wardrobe in a year would bite. No wonder he put his foot down! Smeg really just didn’t have a single clue about what being a member of the RF was all about. Them banging on about service was an utter joke! Rather, “we’ll ‘serve’ as long as you pay us”! It’s him I blame far more though. She’s just your basic grifter and hustler - he knew better but aided and abetted anyway!
Great points re: Freddie. He is a CFA (that is a TOUGH exam) at JPMorgan and has been there for yonks. He isn't in the Private Wealth Management side -- which would normally be where a royal would sit as they would want to leverage on his royal connections etc. No he is in the mathy part of. He has a job, a nice wife and THAT, dear Hawwy, is called being independent.
You, Hawwy, are what we call being a bleep
Agreed - Charles patches his jackets, has suits from decades ago and very expensive shoes that he wears for years and has resoled. It helps he has worn the same style for decades. I don’t think Catherine has ever work a £100,000 outfit, except possibly her wedding dress.
Meghan wanted Oprah money, Beyoncé money, Bezos money - just for existing?
Meghan wanted Oprah money, Beyoncé money, Bezos money - just for existing?
Who is presenting the OSCARS this year? Presumably someone 'safe' after last years fiasco. But I'd sure like to see a few jokes made about 'Spare' and the Netflix documentary ... that will sting. 
This #FreeHarry stuff is related to “Institution”? Hahahah, I thought that was targeted on Smeg to let Harry go, as I imagine she would have him locked in Montecito, under her “claw surveillance”, Doria making sure he had enough weed and drugs.
You know, similar to Brittney Spears “custody”.
Oh well.
How sad.
Nevermind.
Making the case for reform: Sounds like Meghan's plan all along. She thought she should be able to jump the queue!
Find it hard to believe that Meg wasn't instructed in what it would be like to be an active member of the royal family even before her marriage. At least by her husband but by the RF and all the people at the palace.
Did she think it was going to be like Disney, happy ever after with pretty clothes and riding in golden carriages while the plebs wave and cheer?
Did she think it was going to be like Disney, happy ever after with pretty clothes and riding in golden carriages while the plebs wave and cheer?
The video raises an interesting point about Harry and the expectation of reverence. His chosen interviews have been reverential i.e. pushback against him was minimal from Tom Bradby and Anderson Cooper. What makes him so malicious is that he knows he has nothing, nothing concrete which he could argue with against an interviewer pressing him for factual examples or evidence and so he only agrees to interviews so long as he is given softball treatment. Had either Bradby or Cooper gone off script and genuinely challenged him then I could easily see Harry getting up and walking out. I think back to the Andrew/BBC interview and he expected no such reverence and, knowing the seriousness of the allegations, he knew he had to stick it out and give some explanation even if it was fantastical.Wow, good points.
Harold, for your own sake, you should watch this video (well, if you manage to go through that video without tantrumsbut still worth a try)
I think it is part of why Harry hates the press so much as in the tabloids don't engage in such reverence and if they have video of Harry uttering a racial slur or getting pictures of him in provocative outfits then they won't pull any punches and will expose such behaviour. He wants to have total adoration and permanent reverence but at the same time have others turn a blind eye to his more unsavoury behaviour, behaviour he feels entitled to engage in. I totally understand how he might have felt thrown to the wolves with his brother also being up to adolescent and teenage shenanigans of his own but I also think he should have had the capacity to glean that his brother is to be the King and favouritism would come into play. Duh Harry. His brother also obviously matured. I think he may also have a persecution complex in that he fails to grasp that if William stupidly wore a nazi uniform, called a colleague a rag head or was falling out of nightclubs pissed drunk then the same persecutory forces would have also been devoid of reverence and would have equally vilified his brother. The difference is that William would be the type to learn from his mistakes whereas for Harry it is never his fault i.e. W&K said I should wear the uniform, I had unconscious bias, I had to walk behind my Mums coffin *glug* *sniff* *drag* etc.
Last edited:
I’m not sure tbh. I’m not sure how much more you can modernise an archaic hereditary institution! It’s great that girls now have parity but you can never get rid of the need for bloodline and parenthood from the moment of birth.
Not just because I am one (!) but I could see perhaps a lesbian couple being ok because you could use the royal half’s egg and have the non-royal partner carry. It would be both their legal child from birth so perhaps donated sperm (especially from a family member of the non-royal) would be alright. I’m not at all sure though. It would need all the realms and territories to agree too and I don’t think that would ever happen.
But you can never have surrogacy because it always needs adoption or a parental order. There’s a break in the chain - the kid isn’t both of theirs from birth. I’m not sure the RF can ever go there tbh. I think a gay king would just have to have the next in line as his heir.
If the Harkles hadn’t been such grifting idiots, they could have begun the conversation! They’d have had a lot of support, especially as infertility is rocketing worldwide, and even if their kids weren’t in the LOS, they could have got credit for perhaps paving the way for future heirs. Morons!
Mum and I were today talking about my one cousin who hasn't turned away amidst this narc drama. She's not been keeping well, and though she's cut down her social life quite a bit, she still has to entertain guests and attend weddings, events, lunches etc a lot. So not a lot of opportunity to really rest. Mum said maybe it's by choice, but I said it's more how she was raised - trained to always be 'ready' (as in dressed up nicely to receive guests/go out at short notice), be social and smiling and the life of the party no matter how she's feeling health or emotion-wise. Rather like Catherine, I suppose.
She was born to a wealthy, social family, married into a similar one. They have these expectations of all members of the family. Everyone plays a role. The men have to work, daughters and DILs either work or if they stay at home, they don't exactly get to stay at home. They manage the house, play hostess, do charity work, go out and socialise. The men, when they are at home or at special events, also have to be attentive hosts. Socialising is networking and drives most of their businesses. It's hard work - remember names and details of everyone's lives, always be lively and pleasant, be able to talk about a variety of subjects, and women's fancy clothes and heels are never comfy, also keeping an eye on/managing the catering etc.
And yes, I've seen them do the same sort of things as Charles - though it's a part of our culture to patch and use or reuse things for years. Hand-me-downs etc used to be such a good thing for us, though now people make faces over it (my aunt used to give me the best stuff - even gave me one of her bridal outfits that I've kept nicely and plan to incorporate something from it if I ever get married).
No one gets paid to just exist, at least not in half-sensible families. Yes, there are some bad eggs who are totally useless, but really, Smegs shouldn't be aspiring for that title the way she bangs on about her chariddeeee.
Not sure… on Aldi’s birth certificate, the doctors signatures are missing (so obviously the required criteria was not met) and yet, him and Lidl are listed in the LoS.Just had a thought about the prince and princess titles for the kids. I had been wondering why we hadn't heard that they had received the titles
and why the Harkles haven't been kicking up more of a stink about it.
Someone mentioned on here that they need to see proof of birth etc etc to be able to get the titles. Normally of course there would be proof of birth when the rules were written they would not have had to clarify these things as the births would have been presumed to be properly announced conducted etc.
Now I am thinking maybe someone told the Harkles that they wouldn't get the titles BECAUSE they hadn't done things by the book, hence the HARKLES are staying silent on the topic because they don't want it known that they used a surrogate. At the time of the Oprah interview they didn't know all the rules. It's just a topic that everyone seems to have gone silent on.
Hope you feel better soon Who’sYerDaddyShe’s a drama queen and drama is all she knows. It’s her oxygen; her lifeblood.
She’s a bleep.
Watch videos of cute puppies and kitties, Cass Bear! They will make you smile again!
I’m out of the office again & through the week. Apparently, I’ve an infection & some fluid in my pericardium (heart sac) which is making me struggle to breathe. Myis strong, but my 🫁’s are workin’ overtime. Sucks when breathing is a chore akin to scrubbing the floor!
(Sucks worse to be a Narcissist, though!!)
🫖
🧉🧉That frugality seems to be there alright. This is old, old money we're talking about. The kind of people who do buy high end but purely because, assuming such things are maintained, they will last for decades since such things are built to last. The best example for me is Williams watch. He is a Prince and money is no object. He could commission a one of a kind piece from a watchmaker like Roger Smith but he still wears his Omega, a gift from his Mum when he turned 16. Not exactly a cheap Casio but retaining it infers there is an old school/money mentality in the family. He clearly cherishes it and, as mentioned, once he gets it serviced then it will probably be gifted to one of his sons. You then have Meghan coming in and thinking that just because there was an abundance of money to spend then one and done outfits were acceptable. The idea of Catherine repurposing previously worn outfits was likely a head scramble as in Why would you do that? Why can't we accept freebies? I can totally see an impressionable Harry thinking doing Insta-like "collabs" with designers or becoming endorsement figures for luxury items was some grand way of modernising the monarchy, that it was financially prudent because the designers would be gifting them and no money needed to be spent by Pa. Understandable pushback against doing that would then rile him up.
Last edited:
Should have baptised that bleep in a deep bath wearing a concrete scarf!!
- Status