Americans don't say mum
Americans don't say mumIs that really it?? Fucking hell talk about scrapping the barrel. It's nothingness. I have no idea why they are sharing it? Are they really classing this as an argument or Kate being arsey. It it just absolutely pathetic.
View attachment 1869537
I believe I requested a spoiler for this cunt!What would it take for the cunt to frown on Harry?
I would say as well that Charlotte is into her clothes like from her ensemble at the Queen's funeral with her hat and everything, I would say that she cares what she wears.No matter who made who cry over Charlotte's bridesmaid dress, it looked a chuff. The bagginess not such a big deal, but the hem was all uneven.
Maybe Catherine was concerned and wanted everything to be right for Meghan’s sake. So the focus would be on the bride and not the unkempt bridesmaidsCatherine had given birth not long before the wedding.
Her daughter's dress looked a mess - if we look at the photos the hem is uneven - and there is a Royal rule that pantyhose/tights/stockings must be worn, but Meghan was insisting on bare legs.
Meghan as bride wanted everything her own way but that beastly Protocol kept thwarting her.
Wedding planning is stressful. Royal weddings must be even more stressful.
Brides, little bridesmaids, mothers of little bridesmaids might all be on the edge of tears at any moment.
I think its understandable that this situation might lead to tears.
I don't think its helpful for either family to dwell on it. I thought we'd heard the end of it, but here he is, honest 'arry stirring it all up again.
even that woke lad he's got on says he's struggling to keep supporting the Harkles.Dan's all fired up and ready to go! Should be a good show
My apologies if I was brusque.I don’t know enough about the whole story, I have been lurking here for a while but the threads are going so fast that I don’t have a clue about “the Reitman’s photo-shoot”.
I just wanted to say that Meghan’s claim about it is stupid and useless. She has nothing concrete against Catherine and people who think that the RF is racist or mean just because of some irrelevant claims with no proofs are very gullible. The proofs showing how crazy and revengeful they are are accumulating and keeping trusting them is weird.
Here, in France, we only have Meghan’s version as people are only aware of her interview with Oprah. As everything is in English and we have our own issues, people don’t really think/care about this.
Things are starting to change thanks to Harry’s book actually and the part about talibans. People are realising that this couple is dangerous and mentally unstable.
That's the episode from Friday night. He went on to say that Harry was preparing to have the book shoved up his arse, oh sorry, his ass (sarcasm alertI'm half-asleep but Graham Norton just came on - not sure what episode it is. He says that Sparry is still preparing to visit the UK for the coronation. Then shows that photo from polo with Sparry squatting and showing the worldthat he is allhis arse. Jamie Dornan is in this episode.
Thank goodness I don't have my specs on. Have seen too much of Sparry lately.
I’ve never thought she slept with him. No way the marriage would have happened if that had happened IMO. I do agree they have been in the same circles for sure.I remember Andrew giving her irritated looks a couple of times on the balcony - most notably on the one where Harry told her to turn around. I don't think he slept with her, but I am sure they were in the same circles
Trisha Goddard spent some time in a psychiatric hospital. Her daughter later had similar difficulties to Harry, drink, drugs, etc. I wonder if this could be the connection to Harry. Perhaps they were receiving support from the same agency. Her daughter is just a few years younger than him. Trisha says that she was guilty of not recognising her daughter's difficulties and I suspect this is why she blindly supports Harry too.she is all in the ' hollywood ' crowd now so she has to butcher her face to keep looking ' young ' for the tv
I don’t know enough about the whole story, I have been lurking here for a while but the threads are going so fast that I don’t have a clue about “the Reitman’s photo-shoot”.
I just wanted to say that Meghan’s claim about it is stupid and useless. She has nothing concrete against Catherine and people who think that the RF is racist or mean just because of some irrelevant claims with no proofs are very gullible. The proofs showing how crazy and revengeful they are are accumulating and keeping trusting them is weird.
Here, in France, we only have Meghan’s version as people are only aware of her interview with Oprah. As everything is in English and we have our own issues, people don’t really think/care about this.
Things are starting to change thanks to Harry’s book actually and the part about talibans. People are realising that this couple is dangerous and mentally unstable.
he is usually very pro-Harkle - great to hear him calling out Harold's hypocrisy re the press and Harold courting publicity.even that woke lad he's got on says he's struggling to keep supporting the Harkles.
Didn’t she at some point appointment a PR form or legal advisors who had Epstein as a client? Am sure I read that somewhere. I think the fact they kept very quiet regards Andrew says a lot. If anything that’s the part most people would be likely to support them in if they were clearly condemning his behaviour. It could of course be partly due to the relationship they have with Eugenie.I remember Andrew giving her irritated looks a couple of times on the balcony - most notably on the one where Harry told her to turn around. I don't think he slept with her, but I am sure they were in the same circles
No worries. I understand that my English is not great so it can be confusing and having these two idiots spreading lies about your country is terrible and you have every right to feel angry.My apologies if I was brusque.
That was PERFECT, even the pose was the same..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?