No No she will drag out the green goblin outfit again my eyes eyes
@MeInMidAmerica - I'm sorry, I didn't mean to upset you.
We Brits have a very black sense of humour. The worse things are, the darker the jokes get and I'm sure you would be horrified and some of the things that have made me laugh when things have been at their bleakest.
Bare in mind that for all the nasty things the Harkles have done they are arrogant and narcissistic. They want to be worshipped so the absolute worst thing you can do (barring physically harming them, obviously) is to subject them to ridicule.
So I assume we would like more videos?
Found one I hadn't seen before either
No No she will drag out the green goblin outfit again my eyes eyesThat green dress is so simple yet so statement . Cue meghan in green in coming weeks 🫠
Actually it comes to something when an emerald choker is the same value as your house...so I think she'll abandon green!No No she will drag out the green goblin outfit again my eyes eyes
You're right, I think.I didn't watch at first because ... Cringe
But when I saw your comment I did. Did he say "I hear fromCharlotte, Louis and George" ... ?
Please don't tell me William is letting his children talk to this piece of shit?
I see...
He says "Sharky and George"
I think that's a bit naive. There might not be any to reveal, but it doesn't mean they won't make any up!And apparently we, the nasty British public, may also be targetted. If previous Harkle outbursts are anything to go by, then presumably we can look forward to being branded racist, backward, colonial, lacking a work ethic, etc.
Royal family unflustered about Sussexes on Netflix as there are no bombshells to reveal
Royal sources describe promised revelations as ‘very wearying’, with the palace hoping not to have to ’engage’ directly with any claims madewww.telegraph.co.uk
I remember when the Beckhams moved to America, Victoria insisted on having a six-part reality TV series but NBC were having none of that and told Simon Fuller it would just be a 60-min special.The documentary is six episodes long! Surely they cant just be showing a scripted lovestory for six whole hours! What on earth is there left to say?
It might just be a love fest, but I do wonder if Netflix, would add in a few spicy and contentious details about H & M themselves!!!
Even all the Diana documentaries on Netflix are only an hour long!
I wonder if they will be talking to anyone who has ever worked previously with H & M? going back to some of her colleagues from Toronto? Or the people interviewed by Tom Bower? Or even do a few interviews with Samantha or Thomas? I wonder if Is there any way of seeing a contributors list?
I’ve been thinking that there may have been some clandestine video shoots that took place no one even knew about. I know ppl will say they don’t do anything unless there’s publicity, but I do wonder. I guess we’ll find out when it hits. Something just tells me there’s going to be some “staged” “humanitarian” shots in this shit show.I think that's a bit naive. There might not be any to reveal, but it doesn't mean they won't make any up!
Archived version: https://archive.ph/DNRpF
We say ‘pulled through a hedge backwards’My mom.always used to say if someone looked untidy, they looked like a sack of shit, tied up
Brutal black country stuff
Scabies and Finding Freedom ?KPwouldnt it be great!
I also wonder, if Palace lawyers could cite personal/national security issues? There are probably reasons why photos aren't allowed in private areas of the palace, mainly due to security issues. The photo of H& M exiting Buckingham Palace viewed from the back for instance.
Those footmen could be security staff, whose identity is a state secret!
Orca's lies, and the case against Andrew, were very much ''he said, she said'' with just enough ambiguity to make it difficult to pursue. Photos being taken in private /secure parts of the palace are something else!
eg you can into trouble for taking photos inside secure govt buildings, without permission, which I assume also includes RF palaces, as its a breach of the Official Secrets Act
Yes but he is now a changed man, solely interested in "protecting" his family by doing his wife's bidding and whoring themselves out to the highest bidder.Hawwy's behaviour in all this is coming across as extremely immature and childish! Was he spoilt and indulged as a child? He comes across as a man child who has never ever had to take any accountability for any of his actions!!!
This is the second time he has made a direct PR attack, on his older brother, by allowing the TV series adverts to be aired whilst his brother is on a work trip to promote Earthshot. That makes it both personal and professional.
What therapist worth their salt would be recommending this kind of petty revenge for a family feud? I wouldnt blame Kate and William for never wanting to speak to him again!
‘And the witness is now... eliminated .’And the witness is now... eliminated .
Conspiracy ?
Moi.
Of course, the basics of PR/media are a sum of ''conspiracies'' to ''create'' a persona/narrative, a image/story which often is nothing but a big fat lie.
However , contary to the ''blame Peg'' narratives , it's Harry that is destroying his
brother, father, his grandparents and his past ignoring Diana , and he looks very pleased and content .
Maybe it's indoctrination or '' ideological influence '' which is enabling him to compartmentalize this into:
''change'' improvement ... etc, but the fact that the Queen didn't trust him (theorists told us once that Peg had to sit alone with footmen, and only Harry was allowed in) to even invite him alone with Lidl (like claimed ) paints a picture.
Absolutely agree. That's why I said in some early thread that the only way for TRF is to release (dripping discretely) cunts mental history. I really believe that there is something wrong, unrelated to current situation.A human can chose to try to eliminate bias by pondering ones own motives at every action which he engages in, or he may chose not to try to eliminate bias.
Harry grew up believing that he is visibly equall, then PR (Charles) made him -better, more popular, ''someone to party with'' (like Camilla )
The imagery of the ''boy behind the coffin '' enabled this:
Britons shrug off Prince Harry's naked photos
Personal photos of UK's favorite partying prince hardly a royal scandal, many Britons saywww.cbsnews.com
He possibly really believes that ''it will be better'' his ideas are however based on the fact that he once was visibly equal , and more popular .
He knows the concept of Monarchy , but he believes that he is going to change it.
See Australia tour comments, see linked not ranked, service is universal ...
Motive?
Altruism ?
Or revenge , on Charles and Camilla (rightfully so ) by simply creating collaterals(W&K) because logically they are on the ''enemies side.''
He doesn't get enough credit, Peg is actually more educated than him, but less ''in'' less ''life smart.''
It's ignored that Harry spent a liftetime surrounded by people that make Lord Geidt look like a tame kitten .
The attacks are basic ''overshadowing ,'' Harry probably laughs about them, because he knows (and knew before Peg) that nobody messed with US machinery and got away with it. By default , even without the money, the scale is different .
A ''new age'' type of therapist , the types that encourage ''to cut out toxicity '' without even figuring out what is actually toxic.
Also Harry will never respond to therapy the way we belive he would, therapy in Harry's case is a ''tool'' of validation , a ''get away'' card, a method of ''presenting truths''(he suffered) ,he's done it before and got away with it.
''I was in a bad place...
But, but I was drunk
But, but the media, mum, pressure ...
But...I killed, my father wants...''
Or she's disappointed that a decent dick is attached to...Harry, and not somebody better .I don’t for a SECOND believe she’s crying in that picture! She’s laughing, but trying to make us believe she’s crying!
Okay. Well, maybe she IS crying, but it’s probably only because she just got her first dick pic text from H, and…well…she was very disappointed in the royal jewels
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?