Does that mean that the flat packs are already Prince and Princess?At the top of http://www.royal.co.uk/ it says that '' some information is outdated .''
Tis the ''spin.''
Waiting for a big event to updated it without MSM having a interest to create outrage, because occupied with the big event.
The thing is:
-I haven't found a ''backwards'' way to interpret any of the Letters Patent as anything else but as outlined by Debretts.
All wordings don't contain ''born as grandchildren'' of a Monarch , meaning that so far there's zero indicators that there's relevance to them being born great-grandchildren.
Bagehot, Wilson, Heritage site, and various Encyclopedias don't mention any relevance to the fact that they are born as great-grandchildren.
And the only way to spin this, is as I mentioned before ''the rejection of the lesser title of the titleholder (Hary, Earl Dumbarton) sets a ''precedent '' for the automatic assumption of Princely titles.
But there's no chance IMO that it happens .
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Does that mean that the flat packs are already Prince and Princess?
For real, if they’re gonna do the reconciling AFTER releasing the big bombs - what’s the point? It just alienates the family further and make reconciliation less likely!
Orca's people still appear to be in the Meghan is an Angel camp.
If Hazno is genuinely against misinformation on social media including twatter, he could do worse than to start with this very tweet?
If Hazno is genuinely against misinformation on social media including twatter, he could do worse than to start with this very tweet?
What’s funny is the thing about avocados how environmentally bad they are (water intensive crop) and also the cartels are now involved in the industry
I took the outdated information to mean that there are still a lot of references across the site that say words to the effect they are dedicated to duty to the Queen etc.
The LOS has been updated on royal.uk a number of times, first to changes the Cambridges to Cornwall and Cambridge (including the kids), then to Wales. And then the website has been updated with ‘the king’ and ‘the POW’. People are updating that website constantly and the kids still are Master and Miss. i don’t think that is an oversight.
Yes.
I even tried the ''there were no multiple generations living/ being relevant as heirs.''
Well, wrong Queen Victoria- 3 generations .
It requires a advanced constitutional lawyer to find the right ''spin'' which basically wouldn't be factual, to fix this.
This is two years + old, but it’s great! Go, Zara, GO!!! 
Well, finally found the article again re Prince and Princess for farch and invisibet. As far as I can see, they are not automaticalky Prince and Princess. It is only the eldest children (not grandchildren) of Prince of Wales to be titled thus. Have done some screenshots. Read to the end
www.express.co.uk
British royal history puts Meghan and Harry title row to bed
Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana remain styled as ‘Master' and ‘Miss' despite holding the right to prince and princess titles - but is the choice more complicated than previously thought?
Last edited:
Apologies if already posted
www.dailymail.co.uk
Meghan Markle backed charity One Young World is being investigated
The Charity Commission launched the probe just days after portraits of Meghan and the Duke of Sussex taken at the charity's annual summit in Manchester in September were published.
Well, finally found the article again re Prince and Princess for farch and invisibet. As far as I can see, they are not automaticalky Prince and Princess. It is only the eldest children (not grandchildren) of Prince of Wales to be titled thus. Have done some screenshots. Read to the end
British royal history puts Meghan and Harry title row to bed
Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana remain styled as ‘Master' and ‘Miss' despite holding the right to prince and princess titles - but is the choice more complicated than previously thought?
View attachment 1636337View attachment 1636338View attachment 1636339View attachment 1636341View attachment 1636343
Please can we give Harry the "Earl of MacDuff" title to go with Dumbarton?
Which is understandable. However, the premise is that Charles had been thinking about this for ages, this could have been publicly and officially addressed (as they did for Edward) before the children were born and before all the drama.
It would have been done and dusted by now. They would still be bitter, but it would be old news.
In my opinion, the best way to address it now is to do so sooner rather than later. And in the explanation, they also need to emphasize that Charlotte and Louis' children will not be expected to have titles. So it doesn't seem like it only affects Harry's kids.
I can't understand why they want titles for their American kids who could never use the titles in the US, it makes no sense.
I fully expect William to change things when he becomes King so Charlotte and Louis’s children can have titles. It would be his right.
I don't like his ‘live’ videos, too long and he gets caught up in who is watching him.
Last edited:
I agree. Very little analysis at all. Now he's basically an opinion channel like PDina and Taz. (Not knocking them. I love their channels, but he started out analyzing body language which is what made people subscribe to him.) I actually love opinion channels, but I don't like the change in TBLG's case since it's different than how he originally started out. It's not like he would run out of subject matter.
Another thing that bothers me is that now a picture or the frozen video of TRF or Haz and his ho take up the whole screen except for a tiny sliver where TBLG is. This goes back to preferring his old format where he would be the main focus and he would insert clips or pictures to show what he was explaining.
Lol. Why do you think she's a nightmare to live with.Slightly off-topic, but anyone else (mostly talking to the men here) think According2Taz is getting hotter by the second?Got a little crush on her ... I suspect she might be a bit of a nightmare to live with, but I find that kinda hot from a distance.
I think she's pretty in her videos because her personality is so pleasant it makes her pretty. (Not saying she isn't anyway, I'm just saying personality really always adds an extra layer of attractiveness.) I also think it's interesting that in the pictures she sometimes inserts in her videos she always looks even prettier than in her videos.
Koo Stark never sold her story or caused any embarrassment for TRF afterwards as far as I recall, don't know about the other girl, if they thought they had trouble with Andrews choices compared to what he brought to them later in terms of bad press the Queen and PP would have been speechless, for all Andrews faults though he pales into insignificance compared to the treachery Harry has committed, the worse of which is foisting a creature like Markle onto his own family.
How does he put up with this?
See, I hate the whole "shorts" thing on YouTube. To me it's like a way to do a lazy short video and still get lots of views (and money). This one YouTuber that I sometimes watch does a lot of shorts on his channel. (The other videos are bragging "Insane $12,000 lens field test" or similar videos of that nature.) It always seems to be the people who either make their living off YouTube or a good chunk of their income that do shorts. Minimum effort and maximum return. I'm not opposed to YouTube as a way to make a living, but don't be lazy about it.
- Status