They have moved to Portugal.Last time they came Eugenie had to move out of frogmore with her husband and baby
Did they move back ?
Don't tell me that fucker wants to be a TV star here would just suit them both, free housing and security,if this does happen will cancel my BBC licence and any station showing her cuntface.Lady C plunging right in
Old Jamaican saying 'if you spit in the sky it will fall in your eye' - retribution slow to catch up with the Harkles.
The Harkles coming to UK for Netflix footage? Megsy Baby will give a keynote speech. Coincides with Boris handing over to new PM, and TQ receiving him or her. Will the Harkles see TQ? Lady C believes it will be very ominous if they are not received by TQ.
Racism claims based on Smeg being 1st poc to marry into TRF? Not strictly true. Preposturous posturing, and bronzing herself up to fit the coloured narrative. Lady C wrote a book about it - People of Colour in TRF. There were many more poc before her with Diana (William & Haz) having İndian blood in their ancestry.
İRS investigating the Harkles? Smeg will shout racism and call Kamala for help at the injustice.
Smeg glared at Princess Charlotte at the wedding? Yes, she clearly did, and Charlotte froze. Smeg is not that good an actress to disguise her true feelings. The Cambridges will not be very forgiving of such behaviour towards an innocent child.
Haz using surname Wales - so Smeg can be Princess of Wales? This is probably the motivation behind it, spurred on by Smeg. Haz is not Prince Henry of Wales, and has no right to be using it - he is Duke of Sussex. Everyone can see Smeg's moves on the chessboard of life - she is transparent as freshly cleaned glass.
Bill to give Monarch power to remove titles? Lady C believes it has some merit in that the Monarch can revoke titles. But there is also something disquieting about the desire for a committee of MP's to recommend to TQ that she should do so. Stripping TQ of her unsullied right where titles are concerned becomes political. Lady C hopes the committee part is excluded as the bill progresses.
No birth certificate for Lilibet Diana exists in US? Did Smeg submit an informational certificate in lieu of an actual certificate? Lady C maintains we have a right to ask questions as birth certificates are a matter of public record.
Smeg's use of her eggs questioned as children presented as lily white with red hair? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion as long as they don't state it as a fact and lay themselves open to defamation.
Hypocrisy of breaking rules? Smeg is a rule breaker and has encouraged Haz to ignore every rule he was brought up to abide by. The Harkles expect everybody to follow their rules on everything - dictator-like.
Smeg being touted as a big Hollywood star on UK TV? Presenters have to toe the line. Andrew Morton was one of the first to big Smeg up in his book. MSM are still doing this even though they know it is a lie. TV wants to enhance its hold on power and enrich itself. Piers Morgan dared to question Smeg and was fired for it. False narrative being spun that Smeg is a victim rather than a perpetrator, and gave up a wonderful career for TRF. The reality is that she was a d-list actress, reasonably successful but was never a star. The only constellation she is starring in is one of true dubiousness - a star of misinformation, divisiveness, and bitterness.
Yes well lets ''spin''Meghan is the grifter of all grifters.
Damn!
I would think Charles would give them Clarence House. At least that was the plan.
But Camilla will no longer stand for that.
I just don't see that happening at all.
Buckingham Palace : Charles
Windsor Castle : William
Clarence House : Edward (?) (Would be fitting if he is given the Duke of Edinburgh title)
Osborne House : English Heritage
Highgrove : This was rumoured that it will be transformed into a Youth centre to be headed by the Earl of Snowdon as early as next year
Prince's people show us plans for Highgrove in 2022
The Prince is planning to bring a little bit of Scotland to his Gloucestershire estate next yearwww.gloucestershirelive.co.uk
Sorry I missed the troll. Good for you, @LadyMuck. Asking if she were Meghan.And my post asking if it was meghan!
She's on Quora and contributes to 'The Markles' page and 'The Duchess Diaries'.On Sue Smith's video I posted upthread, she recommends Deanna Eppers latest post or blog but I can't find it. Can another kind Tattler find Deanna's blog please
The world is in an odd place at the moment. Sadly I think propaganda has always existed, from ancient times.... maybe done in very different ways to today and social media, but if you study history, the propaganda associated with the Third reich in Germany in the 1930s was scary , and so deliberate. Books like 1984 by George Orwell are ...also so apt.One of the founders of 60 minutes got a "Happy Birthday '' from a 15 year old at Epstein's.
True Crime , a different take.
None of the ''visible '' or now prominent ''victims '' was in the past considered a victim by the FBI back then.
At the time of ''Andrew doesn't cooperate narrative ...'' Berman was already fired.
During Epstein he was replaced because of incompetence by Packman.
Forged ''legal'' pdf's and document clouds/dockets were spread in which Giuffre's lawyers are communicating with Andrew's lawyers , including misspelling her name.
Forged docs from Epstein's files/depositions/statements (copied document numbers/attorney names from FBI files) implemented in different documents via photoshop, making them look legitimate .
It's all -''pro bono'', notice bottom Giuffre's charity:
Conspiracy movements like QAnon and it's affiliates like Eyes wide open influenced media narratives.
They even inflict damage on Anne's charity via certain hashtags.
Car crash interview, car crash interview,car crash interview...before anyone has seen it, and before it even aired in certain parts of the world.
Sweetheart deal, sweetheart deal..-Epstein's NPA, nobody reads past the headline, a NPA is to boring, and if it was such a ''sweetheart deal'' what did Epstein give in return?
Government plants spreading conspiracy theories to distract from real conspiracies , Assange must be cringing .
All involved individuals related to Epstein's suicide are absolved of responsibility .
It looks like ''content creation'' for mostly US Networks , even Boies owns a production company.
Unless they planted something at Mar-a Lago the only culprits are -non Americans.
Whatever it is, it's a ''human interest'' well satisfied , conspiracy , sects, baby eating, blood rituals , pedophilia ,sensationalism which satisfies the human ''entertainment'' element vs justice -regardless what happened , the process stinks.
The Harkles at least will not have a naming problem with their charity .
Paid to deflect or something else like you said, the pattern for all recent ''victims'' is identical . Those that are the ''front'' of the events to create media and public pressure .
The real victims which remain anonymous are at least monetarily compensated if nothing else, (there is no real compensation for something like that)
And the battle over his millions , isn't even finished .
No, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
Thanks. I've downloaded it and saved it to the Gallery under screenshots. It's possibly slightly clearer. Do you want any specific keywords adding to help search for it at a later date?
Thanks Scotch. I've heard of her but couldn't find the recent article Sue Smith was referring to.She's on Quora and contributes to 'The Markles' page and 'The Duchess Diaries'.
Trouble is, I dont think Charles realises how potentially unpopular he is likely to be with the general British public! This isnt really anything at all too do with H & M, its to do with Charles himself, his past actions his past behaviours, Diana, rages about architecture etc and his age.I think that he believes that he can ''fix it''
If everyone is eliminated -age, scandal , slimming down by popular demand who will be able to argue against it?
Even just half in half out will never get noticed by the majority of the population , focused watchers are smaller groups., it will look like a family reconciled even united.
In times when US narrative's were:
Kate should pick up her game, kate just waited for marriage , Peg in her own right, she's -everything ...better than Kate, even directly after the Harkles married , Charles was paying for Peg's Dior, Valentino, Prada or at least not blocking it, so it fueled even more of ''she earned'' 5 millions on her own.. she can afford it... against Kate.
Simplified the fact that Charles didn't block this type of designers,(that he was afraid or enjoying the possible US expansion via her), which were used against Kate in Peg's favor, tells me everything that I need to know about Charles +the dozens of other concessions .
He would do everything to prevent damage on himself or Camilla .
So yes, I think that he will try, the media will decide if he succeeds -mostly the US part.
The lessons of Way Ahead are a bit lost on him:
''Mice shouldn't fight rats.''
I agree with you about Charles crumbling, but I think he did a long time ago. I don't see that HMTQ has the smarts to manage the Stoats - it just looks that way because she's distant, sacrosanct and untouchable. The Stoats have been unmanageable from day one.Sadly, I think that Charles will crumple.
HMTQ is greatly admired & respected in matters of State & seemingly Philip ran the family, his parenting & influencing favoured the naturally more sensible sharp-witted children & their offspring. Now that he has gone, HMTQ has the tactical smarts to manage the #6s …up to a point. Charles? I am really not so sure. Camilla is his guide & we cast her as great fun, no-nonsense, but is she neutral? Wills & #6 have not always been good for her, so they have history. But I wonder if she takes a wry view, shrugs it all off & has a laugh with C about it - so he will just fold as long as Camilla comforts him? Or Camilla could state her terms, cast a firm eye & pneumatic clench on Charles’s fundamentals, & whisper sweetly ‘Fred. No, just plain no, they have to go’.
Were HMTQ younger with many years more to reign, then just maybe the #6s would be cast out as the underlying BAU a would tick over all the same. We can reasonably foresee that we may have two successions in the next 10-20 years, & a great deal of political & everyday uncertainty as the global power bases realign. The future of the RF is uncertain, it may become completely anachronistic with no discernible benefit in any shape or form at all or it may be a tangible point of security & continuity. The next 20 years are critical.
The #6s are not early grit in this oyster, they are contaminants.
For all the ‘political’ fluff & fumble, they have no fundamental value beyond being disruptors & ‘useful idiots’.
No conspiracist am I, but would I be surprised if Al-Fayed had cultivated some connections between Hazza & other parties? Nope.
The RF need to be rid of them sooner rather than later, a clean break, a quick sharp cut that heals fast.
Diana was meddlesome & sometimes misguided, but even when Bashir was ruthlessly exploited her, she categorically supported William as King, & the general monarchy. No such from Hazza, it’s all Granny & Pa.
The dolt even dissed the US Constitution…
Thank you!IGOs would be organisations that have an MOU to deliver services on behalf of one gov to a host country gov. This is often seen in developing countries where USAID for example might provide training to government medical officials in X country. US gov via USAID and its contracted service delivery org (eg global fund, world bank, Asian development bank etc) have to have an agreement with the gov of X country to deliver those services to its officials, otherwise it could be seen as hostile by the host gov (that is, you can’t just have foreign governments going into countries to deliver services without permission of said country or it could escalate to Russia/Ukraine situ quickly).
Those people would be officers if intergovernmental orgs. I think.
Yes well lets ''spin''
Buckingham Palace : Charles in addition to ''private'' Highgrove, Birkhall, +Camilla's House, +Welsh +Isle of Scily...cue outrage
+Balmoral, Sandrigham-it absolutely doesn't matter the Duchy-not Duchy, the relevance is only about ''living/working'' in.
And Charles has even more-as ''offices''.
Windsor Castle-William+KP-What happens with Anmer
Clarence -Edward-Who gets Bagshot?
Osborne-That one discredited that entire post.
Highrove
Why does the King have pet projects, inviting dodgy donations, when nobody else can?
Why is Belvedere leased by Camilla's and Charles ''bussines'' association ?
Earl of Snowdon- I thought we are slimming down?
But, but Andrew ... yes, there are no super injunctions on Andrew .
Disclaimer for the above:
I don't mind pet projects, properties or anything similar.
In the above there's nothing that bothers me, it's technically normal.
Profiting from Royal connections is also something entirely different for me , than what the media presents as ''profiting .
However if someone succeeds in messing with QM will, then Royal Lodge, Adelaide and the Queen's childhood cottage restored to original by Andrew and Bea could also end in Harkle's hands.
Is it this:On Sue Smith's video I posted upthread, she recommends Deanna Eppers latest post or blog but I can't find it. Can another kind Tattler find Deanna's blog please
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?