Yes well lets ''spin''
Buckingham Palace : Charles in addition to ''private'' Highgrove, Birkhall, +Camilla's House, +Welsh +Isle of Scily...cue outrage
+Balmoral, Sandrigham-it absolutely doesn't matter the Duchy-not Duchy, the relevance is only about ''living/working'' in.
And Charles has even more-as ''offices''.
Windsor Castle-William+KP-What happens with Anmer
Clarence -Edward-Who gets Bagshot?
Osborne-That one discredited that entire post.
Highrove
Why does the King have pet projects, inviting dodgy donations, when nobody else can?
Why is Belvedere leased by Camilla's and Charles ''bussines'' association ?
Earl of Snowdon- I thought we are slimming down?
But, but Andrew ... yes, there are no super injunctions on Andrew .
Disclaimer for the above:
I don't mind pet projects, properties or anything similar.
In the above there's nothing that bothers me, it's technically normal.
Profiting from Royal connections is also something entirely different for me , than what the media presents as ''profiting .
However if someone succeeds in messing with QM will, then Royal Lodge, Adelaide and the Queen's childhood cottage restored to original by Andrew and Bea could also end in Harkle's hands.