- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
What a confusing story to read to a one year old baby
Now this is how she should be reading to the bairn:
That video was all about Meghan saying “Look at me, I’m just a Mum reading to my baby, I’m not that horrid woman who has tried to get one over the RF or the English press, look at me ,I’m just Meghan”.
They’ve used their child to try to manipulate public opinion.
They’ve used their child to try to manipulate public opinion.
Whatever that video is about, it isn't Archie. It's all about Mom and her complete lack of ability to act.
I found it quite upsetting to be honest
that poor little lad, what a life he faces. He's going to be so fucked over by these two.
I found it quite upsetting to be honest
that poor little lad, what a life he faces. He's going to be so fucked over by these two.
I just made the mistake of reading some of the comments under Oled‘s tweet. Now I feel unclean.Scoobie's tweet about it has a couple of other photos and also mentions Save The Children.
I agree, the story reading seems far more aimed at us the viewer, than the baby.
Save with Stories | Save the Children UK
Every donation to Save with Stories will help the children and families who’ve been hardest hit by the coronavirus crisis, both in the UK and around the world.www.savethechildren.org.uk
Oh dear Save The Children. What have you done, associating with Smeghan.
notice how once again, the video quality is tit, despite being alleged to have been filmed on Harry's phone which one would expect to be reasonably up to date, and looks like a soft filter has been applied.
I've got a 15 month old named Archie (was so annoyed when they stole my nameI’ve had children , a while ago I should add. Archie is enormousor is it just me.
). Both the size of their Archie and his speaking and alleged walking skills is not of a 12 month old
There was also the Sharon Stone moment when she crossed her legs
I haven't seen the video, just stills from it. He's a real sweetie but I do think it's kind of a weird thing to release. A photo or two like Kate does would've been really nice.
Does he remind anyone else of a baby John Malkovich? 
He looks a lovely big boy. Tbf some babies are just extra. My son was huge when he was born, too big for his clothes, then a huge toddler, too big for his pushchair, now the tallest child by far in his reception class. Maybe Archie is just one of those children, he has tall genes on both sides of his family, too.
He looks a lovely big boy. Tbf some babies are just extra. My son was huge when he was born, too big for his clothes, then a huge toddler, too big for his pushchair, now the tallest child by far in his reception class. Maybe Archie is just one of those children, he has tall genes on both sides of his family, too.
Also did anyone notice that the pictures from the royals are all previously seen official pictures. Its like that have never spent any time with Archie unless its in front of the media
Thank duck I didn’t watch it that far in. I’ve just eaten!There was also the Sharon Stone moment when she crossed her legs
Poor kid is probably never dressed now they are out of the limelight. Slummy Mummy too busy trying to make something of her life while Daddy slobs around all day without a job.
The comments and the shade!! '' Meghan Markle uses every trick in the book to keep Archie engaged in Save the children video''
https://www.express.co.uk/life-styl...r-prince-harry-save-the-children-latest-video
nothing about it being for his Birthday...its all about it being a charity video!
And the comments by the body Language expert Judi James are fun!
https://www.express.co.uk/life-styl...r-prince-harry-save-the-children-latest-video
nothing about it being for his Birthday...its all about it being a charity video!
And the comments by the body Language expert Judi James are fun!
A stab at presenting him as un Royal Family as possible, as opposed to the immaculately turned out Cambridge children?
Perhaps. Or going down the conspiracy theory route - does he look younger in a baby vest than he would if he was properly dressed?
Lovely little boy but why wasnt he dressed (as others have said on here). It just didnt look natural especially with her looking at the camera so often in a 'look at meee' way. Why couldnt they have released a photo of Archie with Harry.
I wonder if they will get the turn in his eye fixed. Didnt Louise, Prince Edward's daughter, have the same thing?
I wonder if they will get the turn in his eye fixed. Didnt Louise, Prince Edward's daughter, have the same thing?
I'm guessing so they can't then be accused of promoting something (or actually promoting something)
I don't really care if he's too big/small for his age.....sorry....
But she's obviously positioned herself so she has maximum natural, flattering daylight and the poor kid is squinting like crazy because of it.
Totally PR/marketing exercise for her and we don't get to see if the kid's wonky eye has been corrected!
But she's obviously positioned herself so she has maximum natural, flattering daylight and the poor kid is squinting like crazy because of it.
Totally PR/marketing exercise for her and we don't get to see if the kid's wonky eye has been corrected!
- Status