Harry & Meghan #112 They’ve got no shame so they stole The Queen’s Nickname

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I only started watching Yankee Wally today. Love her style...I could listen to her all day. Anyway in one of her recent videos she shows how a sugar tweeted to ask fellow squadders to row in behind the book and give the positive reviews a thumbs up to raise their status. I just think it's so pathetic, but not surprising, that her book is bombing so hard that sugars are in a tailspin trying to rescue it 😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
That is pointless whataboutery, because William and Catherine simply wouldn't have used the name Lilibet, at all.
On the plus side the poster made no mention of Andrew. See? Glass half full Freda.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 44
Looks like meggy sue registered a domain for aldi as well as lidl, just after his birth too:



So, do we think this could be the start of things coming back into the public domain?

 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 41
It’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.

Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
Exactly. Even if one parent gets some time off, most partners would only get a few days if lucky. But not this privileged pair of prats. 2 of them taking 20 weeks off...absolute joke. They are so far removed from the real world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 32
Poor thing was struggling with the "evil gray men, teh stuffy courtiers, teh institution, mental health, fear.. " that would deny her the joys of motherhood, she was afraid for Hawwy, afraid of the media....

The reality of this surrogacy thing is that the children are "commoners" so if they are born of a surrogate it doesn't matter, they have no titles. And the Harkles lies wouldn't matter.

Currently the parents however are inflicting a massive damage(yes, I know some don't see it that way) and are suffering absolutely zero consequences. The Church of England thing would only prompt the Harkles to claim that its irrelevant now, they have left.
The problem with this whole thing are the titles, the ones that the Harkles are having, even bigger is the fact that no one can take Harry's birthright away, unless he is Hewitts son.
Its enraging frankly.
Yeah, to be fair I can see her saying that because nothing's ever her fault it seems. If the children are born of a surrogate though, they should still be removed from the line of succession. I couldn't care less if she used one, I just hate the fact she could have lied about using one only to get the titles and to be in the line of succession.

What was the point of her converting to CoE then? Why do that if you're not going to bother practicing it?

I thought they could take away Harry's Prince title via the Titles Deprivation Act or if he actually does put all of his titles into abeyance. It's still a problem though because he'll always be a member of the RF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
İ think it's major plastic surgery. 🤡 İ have no doubt that Smeg and/or Hazzno have already filmed a Diana tribute for the unveiling, and that they will mention Lidl and Aldi. İ also think there will be major strategizing and scheming going on re. princesslilibetdiana.com. İ think TRF needs to employ psychology specialists to defeat and put these two in their place. TRF need to revisit protocols and the devious ways these two have tried to do their own thing at every twist and turn. Everyone is at the end of their tether with their tedious drama-making.
Lidl & Aldi 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Ooh I'm going in!
Link pls?!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 19
I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
Hmmm yeah but William and Catherine haven’t done a tell all interview and trashed the family to keep their income up have they 🤑🤑
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 37
As for Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor that just reeks of desperation to make her as Royal as possible. They could have just plumped for Lilly Windsor (like the Philipps children) but no .....


(I can't read all the pages so apologies if anything has been posted previously )
Lilly Windsor sounds cute as hell! Lilibet Diana is just hideous to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26
This verbal table tennis can go on and on, but let's get to the crux of this.

The threatening statement claimed that Harry had spoken to the Queen and mentioned naming the new baby after her and that :

'Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.'

Firstly, I believe the fact that he meant Lilibet and not Elizabeth was not made clear.

Secondly and probably most importantly of all is the use of the word 'supportive'.

That's a funny word to use in reference to the naming of the new born baby. Wouldn't you expect someone to be thrilled, moved, touched, or the Queen's favourite, 'delighted'?

If the very best Harry can come up with is 'supportive', then that's a very strange way to describe the naming of a great grandchild. The Queen has lots of great grandchildren and the feelings of those she never sees will be muted to say the least, but it's still an odd word to use.

If that's the way the Queen genuinely reacted, then Harry really has pushed her too far and she is seriously angry with him, to the point of disinterest in his life. I'd go so far as to say she's essentially washed her hands of him. He has behaved so badly and caused so much pain, I don't think we see any more of these 'Harry and Meghan are much loved members of the family' statements.

H & M think they've left a giant hole behind, but it's been filled seamlessly. Their disgusting behaviour has strengthened the public's love and support of both the Monarchy and the members of the RF, both within the UK and the Commonwealth. The minority who don't like the monarchy are having a few tantrums, but that's their favourite pastime, bless. 🙄

I maintain that the Queen would have stepped in by now if what the Palace source said was untrue. H & M thought by saying they loved the Queen they would be untouchable. Not so. The Queen will not be treated like a fool, especially by Harry and the only American who makes Mrs Simpson look like a cuddly kitten. Go Queenie! I really love her! 👑 🇬🇧
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 49
Looks like meggy sue registered a domain for aldi as well as lidl, just after his birth too:



So, do we think this could be the start of things coming back into the public domain?

My favourite story similar to this is when she got escorted off site from Frogmore Cottage (or Nottingham Cottage, can’t remember which one it was) for taking photos 🤣 f a b u lousssss 🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20
I HATE THEM!!!!!
Issuing a legal warning to the BBC over them claiming they didn’t ask the Queen’s permission to use the name Lilibet - why is their only resolve to throw lawsuits at everyone who dare have a negative opinion of them? Absolutely pathetic
Half listening to the BBC 6 o'clock news whilst mashing my potatoes but I think it said that the gruesome twosome's solicitors were warning all newspapers as well not to print what had been issued by the "Royal Source". Lets see what's in tomorrow's papers then!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: 31
I have a friend called Harry
He's also very dim
I like to throw tomatoes at him
Tomatoes are soft
And don't hurt the skin
But these fuckers do
Cos they're STILL IN THE TIN!!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 54
Half listening to the BBC 6 o'clock news whilst mashing my potatoes but I think it said that the gruesome twosome's solicitors were warning all newspapers as well not to print what had been issued by the "Royal Source". Lets see what's in tomorrow's papers then!
Whatever happened to press freedom? The newspapers can print whatever the hell they want and in this country there are actual rules and regulations so they can't get away with printing pure lies. Didn't one of the US tabloids basically say that HW was a psychopath (not like that's too far off though)?

Although Harry is the same idiot who implied that freedom of speech is "bonkers".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 36
Archive link for the poor:

Thank you so much for finding this. It is a work of art. Beautifully written so that they are untouchable but very very damning, as they say “recollections may vary”.

It’s genius. I’ve been watching it all unfold…

I know many on here are feeling demoralised by the lack of pushback from the RF but honestly compared to post Ophra they’re positively buzzing. They are letting lose on those 2 Grifters…legal letters to the BBC- really!??

It appears to me that LA believe the world is still up in arms about Panaroma so a shot at thr BBC is well placed, well they’re wrong. I’ve not seen one link today about Diana and No6’s legal threats.

They’re not reading the room (as per usual) but people aren’t putting up with this bollocks.
Is he really going to get HM on the stand to dispute his version….🙄🧐 of course the dozy C*nt wont - this is foolish - but I’m LOVING it.

Hold tight Tattle, the glory will be ours 💥🔥🔥🔥
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 37
Can the next thread title just be my book is a massive flop maybe I should get a job???
Surprised how many people have actually bought it TBH
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
why are all her conversations recorded?

helenaaurellia answered:
It’s standard procedure for all top people in the British government. Aides listen in and conversations are recorded. That way there can be no disagreements about what was discussed.


the-empress-7
I’d say it’s SOP for all Heads of State who conduct official business. The Queen, POTUS etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
Half listening to the BBC 6 o'clock news whilst mashing my potatoes but I think it said that the gruesome twosome's solicitors were warning all newspapers as well not to print what had been issued by the "Royal Source". Lets see what's in tomorrow's papers then!
should say 'lawyers' not 'solicitors' ...... wouldn't let me edit for some reason
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 15
Looks like meggy sue registered a domain for aldi as well as lidl, just after his birth too:



So, do we think this could be the start of things coming back into the public domain?

Well that is disgusting let's hope driabs and drabs are coming through, this is the walk of shame and hope it goes global where was Archie??? But she is still smirking!!

Perhaps this is the shot across the bow for them, hope the fuckers are getting skewered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Ah but William and Catherine would never show such little regard for a person as to use their private pet name. William and Catherine have earned their favourable view in the media and public opinion by virtue of their clean reputation. I understand what you are saying but it's no surprise to see everything H&M do now viewed through a negative lens because they themselves have lost all the love, empathy and support they would have had before they soiled their own reputation.
And we know that W and C would HAVE to have had agreement to name their children as they're in direct line of succession which needs Royal approval. Thats a big difference.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.