Rachel HarriscuntHMTQ needs to get herself a new corgi, a witch, and call her Rachel![]()
Rachel HarriscuntHMTQ needs to get herself a new corgi, a witch, and call her Rachel![]()
But if the surrogacy rumours are true then she faked two pregnancies wearing moonbumps all the time. It makes her look more ridiculous with the stupid belly cupping if she wasn't carrying the baby and her ridiculous spending on maternity clothing. I do agree that you'll get some of the morons defending them with the "outdated rules" argument.Surrogacy rumours are not negative, everyone would break their legs running to defend them, against the "evil, outdated laws and rules, " Archie was a papwalk, like Peg told Orca "it would be a picture she was comfortable to share" and the rest is a word game.
They "accused" BBC of libel.
They "hoped" to give Lil Betty the Queens name.
Lies by omission, they are Teflon, the constant slander works, and they don't move a finger, it's all part of their PR package.
I feel for her too. These 2 are unbelievable !I really feel for HMQ. She will be feeling sad tomorrow as it would've been PPs 100th birthday which it was said he was looking forward to. Having to deal with these 2 c*nuts must surely be telling on her. As strong as she is, she is 95 years old. What I would like to do to the toxic twosome, I cannot say without being banned!
They probably asked if they could name the baby after her, but they definitely will not have asked if they could name the baby Lilibet. HM probably said ges to naming her Elizabeth and now No.6 Tit is saying they had "permission".I had breakfast telly on at about 8.00am this morning on ITV and their reporter was saying that the reports that the Harkles had not asked for permission to use the name were wrong, and that they definitely had asked. Nothing is straightforward with these two.
I just hope the gruesome twosome don't pull any stupid stunts tomorrow and remain quiet. I don't want to hear anything about how they're going to mark the late Prince Philip's 100th birthday when they overshadowed the last few weeks of his life with their stupid complaining and accusations.I really feel for HMQ. She will be feeling sad tomorrow as it would've been PPs 100th birthday which it was said he was looking forward to. Having to deal with these 2 c*nuts must surely be telling on her. As strong as she is, she is 95 years old. What I would like to do to the toxic twosome, I cannot say without being banned!
Oh they won't stay quiet! Maybe a watery limp fisted birthday message or they will debut the baby picI just hope the gruesome twosome don't pull any stupid stunts tomorrow and remain quiet. I don't want to hear anything about how they're going to mark the late Prince Philip's 100th birthday when they overshadowed the last few weeks of his life with their stupid complaining and accusations.
My thought is that after ‘phone call gate’ where Gobby King told her morning show audience what had happened with PWB and PC/PW ‘private’ phone call - I very much doubt any of the senior royals would speak to them alone or at the very least will now record/tape the calls - eg 2 can play at that game - and also remember the CV that TQs new Private sec hasI don't know if this has been said before as I'm not up to speed on these threads, but OMG, these bellends are the gift that just DOES NOT stop giving!
1, I call my 92yo cousin in Canada, sometimes I have to repeat myself and yell. I'm not implying that the Queen has hearing issues but she is an old lady, so maybe misheard "Lilibet" and just said "mmmm" this was mistaken for "consent"?
2, I had a Texan friend, let's call her Amanda. She once told me that she had to change her name by whatever US deed poll is because in America, the mother is forced to register the baby there and then. Her mother was so drugged up, she signed "Amder". That was what she was legally known as for years until her parents took her to correct it.
So if the papers are correct, Harry introduced the kid to Granny and during that call told her they would call her Lilibet? Yes?
So, going by what my friend said, unless Just Harry skyped his Nan whilst the baby was crowning in Meg's vag, and said "oh, BTW, we're calling it Lilibet", the ink would have ALREADY dried on the birth certificate, would it not???
Ooooooooh. Fantastic. An actual hero is among us. Thank you, @NorthernValkyrie !I was planning on settling in to catch up on the thread, only I'm being called away so will catch up asap. However, wanted to say: I made a second anonymous Twitter account earlier specifically for defending Queen and Country. I plan on enjoying myselfMy weaponry is The Truth and my armour is common sense and logic. Not a variation where recollections may vary.
Let me know if any of you have something similar (we need a royal legion) or indeed, if you see anything on there you want to respond to but don't want to make an account (happy to do on behalf of).
PS: Haz and PWBW are ensuring a July reunion will be rather toasty, aren't they?![]()
I had my baby 1 month early. Went straight from hospital to the office with my son and worked for 3 hours so then got 4 weeks off.“And Omid Scobie, a journalist favoured by Harry and Meghan, has revealed that the couple are now taking time off work together. He said: 'We're so used to seeing senior royals going back to work but Harry and Meghan are leading by example. They offer up to 20 weeks parental leave at Archewell - it'll be several months off work for the pair of them'.”
duck off Scabie, they’re not senior royals anymore. So how are they leading by example when they’re basically private citizens????
Re the surrogacy it has to be made clear that using a surrogate or gestational carrier is not a stigma as it has become the norm for a lot of wealthy people these days. Many people are open about it, and quietly move on to enjoy their families, and it isn't an issue. Think Ayda Field/Robbie Williams, Kim K herself. However the way in which this pair gaslit the whole world with coat flicking and bump cupping and announcement dithering and lying all for the sake of gaining titles, prestige, and ultimately dollar from merching is despicable. TRF succession is based on hereditary birth and having children must be seen to be honest whether of the body or from a surrogate. İ think Smeg's motives for having children are highly suspect as her own sister said she should not be near or around children, and she does not appear to have much of a maternal sense about her. Who registers a domain on the child's birthday when they should be bonding with and enjoying a new baby. İf the surrogacies are ever exposed then yes İ think Hollywood and woke will come out and support her, but quite frankly they do not understand royal protocol or why it is important to us. İt's our history and tradition, and the sense of continuity we get from the monarchy is a stabilising influence in these crazy times. Smeg and Hazzno are 180 to this idea, and create chaos, division, confusion, instability. İ hate that they are in our faces 24/7 even though they are across the pond.But if the surrogacy rumours are true then she faked two pregnancies wearing moonbumps all the time. It makes her look more ridiculous with the stupid belly cupping if she wasn't carrying the baby and her ridiculous spending on clothing. I do agree that you'll get some of the morons defending them with the "outdated rules" argument.
What's the Church of England's view on surrogacy? Maybe this could be the RF's argument?
You can speak in Clanger we will understand youI feel for her too. These 2 are unbelievable !
but... let's look for the positives ... from what I can see she has some very loving family members to give her support . I wish I could express myself here using the written word but I struggle ... so I've given up as I just keep deleting as not happy with my wording.
He’s an massive bellend anyway, does Meghan even know who he is or has he just taken it upon himself to be her personal witch?“And Omid Scobie, a journalist favoured by Harry and Meghan, has revealed that the couple are now taking time off work together. He said: 'We're so used to seeing senior royals going back to work but Harry and Meghan are leading by example. They offer up to 20 weeks parental leave at Archewell - it'll be several months off work for the pair of them'.”
duck off Scabie, they’re not senior royals anymore. So how are they leading by example when they’re basically private citizens????
There's a red phone on the wall of the nursery, like the one they used to have on the desk at the White House that rang the USSR in emergencies. It rings the lawyer whenever they want to sue someone. The problem is that with all the news stories they haven't been able to hang up since March.Interrupts paternity leave? Did he ever start it?![]()
Harry - "Gan gan if Megs and I have a girl we were going to name her after you, is that OK?"I had breakfast telly on at about 8.00am this morning on ITV and their reporter was saying that the reports that the Harkles had not asked for permission to use the name were wrong, and that they definitely had asked. Nothing is straightforward with these two.
ThisYou can speak in Clanger we will understand youwe are not here to judge you so speak away and join in all contributions are very welcome
![]()
They need a picture of Katie Price or a llama or whatever on the back, then they can turn the picture to reveal whichever photo they choose in that particular moment.Yeah the reasoning is nonsense, but I'd rather they had the right to remove it than be forced to keep it up. It'll probably be put up again by the next lot of grad students in a few years![]()