Harry & Meghan #112 They’ve got no shame so they stole The Queen’s Nickname

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Had a couple of days off from it all, feeling much better, with fighting spirit still ignited. Missed you all ❤

Need to do a proper catch up but am thinking this:

The 20 week 'break' is code for rehab. For both of them.
The latest lawsuit threat = them trying to prise a reaction from HMTQ, after everything, they've still learned nothing
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 34
So this disparity between whether the Queen knew or not has an easy explanation. Both sides are right because the context of the conversation was not fully disclosed by Hazno.
I think he did say to the Queen that he was naming baby after her but what he didn’t say was that it would be Lilibet. The Queen presumed he meant Elizabeth as most people would of done.
He and Megsy then blindside the palace with the statement on Sunday which reveals the name in order for HMTQ to be put into a corner. It means that she then can’t tell him that she doesn’t wish it to be used as it’s already out there and would look bad if she said no.
The Montecito pair are deplorable if this is how it went down 😞
Agree! I just posted exactly the same. HM was ambushed. It's like the Apple series, Noballs gets "permission" for one thing then comes up with something completely different. When there's a backlash he whines that he had permission.
Typical low tactics from this would-be soldier and all-round failure, who failed as a son, husband, father, grandson, film-producer, mental health guru and charity fundraiser. Nil points.
Ugly too, and mean. Face like a badger's bum, and as my mum used to say "I've seen better hair on bacon".
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 43
I feel so sorry for the Queen.. she’s getting on for 100 and she’s got all this shite to deal with !!!
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sad
Reactions: 36
It’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.

Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 63
It’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.

Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
Exactly
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
First Wife will stop at nothing for fame, first she bashes the family then steals the Queen’s private name!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 33
It’s not leading by example to take 5 months paternity leave.

Its rubbing it in people’s faces that they are able to earn millions by doing the odd zoom call and a few interviews bashing your family.
And.... taking 5 months maternity leave when you don’t even have a job
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 33
Had a couple of days off from it all, feeling much better, with fighting spirit still ignited. Missed you all ❤

Need to do a proper catch up but am thinking this:

The 20 week 'break' is code for rehab. For both of them.
The latest lawsuit threat = them trying to prise a reaction from HMTQ, after everything, they've still learned nothing
İ think it's major plastic surgery. 🤡 İ have no doubt that Smeg and/or Hazzno have already filmed a Diana tribute for the unveiling, and that they will mention Lidl and Aldi. İ also think there will be major strategizing and scheming going on re. princesslilibetdiana.com. İ think TRF needs to employ psychology specialists to defeat and put these two in their place. TRF need to revisit protocols and the devious ways these two have tried to do their own thing at every twist and turn. Everyone is at the end of their tether with their tedious drama-making.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 35
I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
I can absolutely guarantee that Catherine and William would never ever dream of being so crass as to use that intensely personal form of Brenda's name. Never in a million years. Nor would they ever tit all over their families like the snarkles do, so the comparison is moot.

Nice to hear you're not a fan of the gruesome twosome though.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 57
I am no fan of how Harry and Meghan have behaved the past few years and continue to. HOWEVER I cannot believe how nasty the press have been towards them for the name their chose for their daughter. I can absolutely guarantee if William and Catherine had called a daughter the same name, the same press having a go at M&H would be writing a million articles saying how cute and loving and sweet it is.
William and Catherine would have never done it, simple. It's not cute, loving or sweet as you suggest. It was a cruel and shameless opportunistic raid on an elderly lady's private and special identity.
It was theft.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 53
Then you have Harry who is one step away from wearing a straight jacket , His Wife who has him by the balls spreading her vile woke poison everywhere ,

I just want someone to shut them up Why is Charles not sorting the Ginger one out
I can only hope that Charles is too busy rewriting his Will and helping TQ rewrite hers before he sorts the Ginger one out.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 47
But if the surrogacy rumours are true then she faked two pregnancies wearing moonbumps all the time. It makes her look more ridiculous with the stupid belly cupping if she wasn't carrying the baby and her ridiculous spending on maternity clothing. I do agree that you'll get some of the morons defending them with the "outdated rules" argument.

What's the Church of England's view on surrogacy? Maybe this could be the RF's argument?
Poor thing was struggling with the "evil gray men, teh stuffy courtiers, teh institution, mental health, fear.. " that would deny her the joys of motherhood, she was afraid for Hawwy, afraid of the media....

The reality of this surrogacy thing is that the children are "commoners" so if they are born of a surrogate it doesn't matter, they have no titles. And the Harkles lies wouldn't matter.

Currently the parents however are inflicting a massive damage(yes, I know some don't see it that way) and are suffering absolutely zero consequences. The Church of England thing would only prompt the Harkles to claim that its irrelevant now, they have left.
The problem with this whole thing are the titles, the ones that the Harkles are having, even bigger is the fact that no one can take Harry's birthright away, unless he is Hewitts son.
Its enraging frankly.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: 23
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time." -- #MayaAngelou

I am part of a true crime podcast.

The above is often misquoted but it’s 100% true in this case.

Every lie, every half truth, every deflection is evidenced.

If we produced an episode without the citations, we would be crucified.

The enablers need to be stopped.

Adding to this, petitions etc whilst good actually do nothing in this instance except make ppl feel good for signing.

Sending emails saying “I won’t buy/support” has limited impact. See Hilary Baldwin.

Only thing that does work is not clicking, not buying endorsed goods.

It then makes the money men take notice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 31
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.