Can someone explain the doll thing?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The Queen has two birthdays, so Meghan wanted at least as many for her kid?If the conspiracy is true, are they going to make the kid celebrate a fake birthday every year? All very odd. I’d like to believe stuff like this doesn’t happen but some mad tit goes on in this world so who knows
Some people think she was never pregnant and used a surrogate
Some people think she was never pregnant and the baby at the photocall was a doll
Some people think the photocall baby was a doll but the christening baby is real (but possibly 2 different babies in the 2 photos)
Some people think that at some point they acquired a baby (either from her own womb or someone else's) but it was a lot older than they claimed so the christening photos were taken in May
And the pregnancy before marriage conspiracy too hahaSome people think she was never pregnant and used a surrogate
Some people think she was never pregnant and the baby at the photocall was a doll
Some people think the photocall baby was a doll but the christening baby is real (but possibly 2 different babies in the 2 photos)
Some people think that at some point they acquired a baby (either from her own womb or someone else's) but it was a lot older than they claimed so the christening photos were taken in May
I think she was pregnant but perhaps padded because she looked huge at a few months gone, but everyone grows differently and I've never been pregnant so...
My bother was that if Archie WAS born as they state, she was barely 12 weeks when she announced it at Eugenie's wedding. Announcing that early and at someone else's wedding is a fool move.
My bother was that if Archie WAS born as they state, she was barely 12 weeks when she announced it at Eugenie's wedding. Announcing that early and at someone else's wedding is a fool move.
yeah i think the clock was just not working lol
12 weeks is the standard announcement week, as it’s the week of pregnancy when women usually have their first scan. But yeah, announcing at the wedding seemed like a fool move.
The theory I heard was that he was a honeymoon baby born on May 6th his birth certificate was released showing all the correct information, her body was a normal post pregnancy shape, no one in the British monarchy bought any dolls and that pictures at the christening we're taken throughout the day at locations and times that varied e.g some pre the ceremony some post, again though that's just speculation and theory.
Totally it's a right out of the fool move handbook. Literally could have waited one day.
And talking of her family, the wedding was the first real red flag for me as I quite liked her before. I accept that you could have few family members you want to be.there in a genuine way as a poster here did. Also that her half sister is a money and attention seeker. But there was something about the plethora of celebrities and lack of old friends as well as family that felt shallow.
And I think whatever happened with her dad was handled really badly. This working class middle aged not particularly worldly guy was seemingly not given any preparation for the inevitable intensity of the world media's attention. And there was no way he was going to walk her down the aisle, healthy or not, can you really picture that happening ?
Maybe if she had really wanted him there she would have flown him out a few months before to introduce him to the firm and their ways and make him more comfortable -if he had the eyes of the world on him giving her away and he had spent time with these people who have been in the spotlight their whole lives (as well as Harry losing his mother to it ) he might be less likely to stage photos and talk to tmz.
Her mother was treated badly too. She should have flown over earlier got accustomed to the time zone as much as the royal family. Maybe it was her decision I don't know but it appeared like an after thought. And the sight of her as a black woman sitting alone like that was terrible. Custom could have been bended considering she was the brides only family and she should have been sitting with the rest of them. Symbolically it would have sent a much better message - especially after the dad drama.
So the photo with the raw data, are we convinced 8th May? Spent my afternoon reading!
I want to know how accurate raw data is ?
It's basically a time stamp on a digital picture right? Is it always correct on date and time?
And do we know for sure the pic itself is legit? We are all taking it for gospel -can we be sure it hasn't been photoshopped?
All objective questions... I don't know what I feel one way or the other so trying to get as much information clear as possible.
It's basically a time stamp on a digital picture right? Is it always correct on date and time?
And do we know for sure the pic itself is legit? We are all taking it for gospel -can we be sure it hasn't been photoshopped?
All objective questions... I don't know what I feel one way or the other so trying to get as much information clear as possible.
What's everyone's opinion on her at the polo today with Archie & Kate?
Archie certainly is a whopper for 2 months old isn't he?
If Archie is only 2 months old, then I'm 18 years old!! [emoji1787][emoji1787]
That is one GIANT 2 month old baby.If Archie is only 2 months old, then I'm 18 years old!! [emoji1787][emoji1787]
Meghan does seem to be in pain, particularly in the second photo, so I suppose it's because she's still recovering from popping such a huge baby! [emoji15][emoji15]
The way she’s holding him..looks so awkward..Kate looks fab as usual!
My 3rd baby was 8.11 born and near 11lb when 6 weeks old. Could hold his head up from a few weeks old as well. My 4th was 7.7 born, lost loads and dropped to 6.12 and struggled to hit 9lb by 2 months, couldnt hold his head up until 6 months old and was delayed and still is with everything else. I suppose everyone's babies are different. But seeing Archie in them photos I just see a normal, cute baby!
- Status