Harry and Meghan

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Why would they go to so much effort to constantly be two months behind on everything though?

All seems a bit odd, especially when Kate and William have been so open about their children ( I know William will be long so it’s slightly different) but seems like a lot of effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
This also states it was taken at nearly 11pm at night, not sure I believe it as much as I want to.
They're saying the time shown is different from a close up of Prince William's watch. [emoji15] It totally could've happened at night tbh, with Meghan's obsession with secrecy.
Several people in the comments have followed these steps below and have confirmed it is indeed true.
Others have said that the baby in the black and white photo seems a couple months older (as he's able to kind of hold his head up) than he was in the one with all the guests. Looking closely and I completely agree.
What an absolute circus.

 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 3
I don't disagree with the fact that they seem pretty much in love, but I think the entire "Let me be a part of the Royal family but don't photograph me at a very public event" is basically turning your back on the public (the people who fund your lavish and comfortable lifestyle).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Is
I don't disagree with the fact that they seem pretty much in love, but I think the entire "Let me be a part of the Royal family but don't photograph me at a very public event" is basically turning your back on the public (the people who fund your lavish and comfortable lifestyle).
Is this the Wimbledon thing? Yes how completely bizarre. Doesn't she realise how bonkers that all sounds?
When all the surrogacy rumours were at their height I remember people saying that if there was lots of secrecy around the birth eg dates, location, christening then it was a good indication something fishy was going on. If this is so I'm not surprised the Queen opted out of it all. And maybe Meghan has just put on weight thinking 'ah duck it' and not bothering with her micro vegan diet any more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
WTAF? Something does not add up...

Elaborate cover ups often come undone. Why not just be honest!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Please do not photograph her as she is there on private business, well then when k middy is out doing her shopping I wont take a pic of her either. Bore off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
The person who runs that Instagram account clearly has far too much time on their hands 🙄

Ridiculous conspiracy theories and I’m not a fan of Meghan but these theories are laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Hmm... He does look a bit older than 2 months but I think babies usually look older/bigger on photos. Some babies are able to hold their head earlier than others. Not sure really.. Meghan definitely lost all of her baby weight fast. I was shocked after her first appearance after giving birth !!
 
I can’t think of any reason why they would go through all this trouble unless the surrogacy conspiracy theory was true.
but I actually think Meghan looks like she was pregnant. How else would her face be so swollen?

Hmm... He does look a bit older than 2 months but I think babies usually look older/bigger on photos. Some babies are able to hold their head earlier than others. Not sure really.. Meghan definitely lost all of her baby weight fast. I was shocked after her first appearance after giving birth !!
I think she is photoshopped in this photo. At Wimbledon her face still looked bigger.

So I saw an article that Me-ghan requested no one take her photo at public at Wimbledon. She thought a man was taking a photo of her yet he was actually taking a selfie. God, I can't stand her. Such a narcissistic fool. She needs to get over herself. Have you ever heard Kate or Will say no one can take photos of them in public? No. She isn't going to last in the royal family.

And I don't normally read the DM but whatever: https://www.archive.is/oldest/https...ns-ordered-not-pictures-Meghan-Wimbledon.html
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Williams watch reads the same time that the EXIF data states the picture was taken on the evening of 08/05/19 (the date of the birth pictures)
It is all really bizarre. I've never been interested in the royals but this has sucked me in. Meghan seems conniving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I don't generally go for conspiracy theories but this is starting to all look a little weird. I was surprised to hear the Queen was not bothering with the baptism, it's her great-grandchild after all, but now I wonder if she isn't just staying away from this circus.
The Wimbledon photo thing really tracks with her perceived insane narcissism: the guy was so obviously taking a selfie! Take a chill pill, Meghan.

Here's a thought: if you didn't want to be photographed, you could have...not married into arguably the most famous family in the world.

PS since nobody mentioned it: the greatest crime being committed here is undoubtedly the hat on Diana's sister (the one in the middle): it is the worst thing that's ever happened to the monarchy :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 10
I don't generally go for conspiracy theories but this is starting to all look a little weird. I was surprised to hear the Queen was not bothering with the baptism, it's her great-grandchild after all, but now I wonder if she isn't just staying away from this circus.
She didnt go to Louis' last year either (but went to George and Charlotte's). She probably couldnt be bothered to travel from Sandringham and is slowing down with her engagements too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.