This really is mind-boggling. Thanks so much for looking into it!
Ah, good point! I didn't know she didn't go to Louis' christening (I am on and off with following the royal family).
In a nutshell (and somebody please correct me if I got it wrong, I'm sure I missed a few posts), there's a possibility that the baby was born way before the birth announcement, which may explain the secrecy around the birth, and that he was christened in May, which may explain the secrecy around the baptism.Sorry peeps I’m a bit slow on the uptake so does this mean he was actually christened in may? On the same day his birth pictures were released? I’m so sorry I’m just so confused I need some one to explain it in simple termsthanks
I did read somewhere that prince Charles has worn the same flower in his lapel to all christenings except George's, as he loved the flower, which is grown on his property.
I don't get why Piers would need to explain haha
. I was intrigued by the identical outfits though
.I only had one member of my family at my wedding. My extended family by and large sucks and I don't want to be associated with them. It's not necessarily an indication there's something wrong with Meghan (I hope, otherwise I'm screwed tooA little off topic but those pictures of her at Wimbledon had serious Michael Jackson vibes about them
Can imagine she'd have Archie treated in the same way wacko did with his masqueraded kids when they were little if she could get away with it ,
Also I still to this day find it so odd that at her wedding she had just one member of her family there... ONE ! Whole families don't turn their backs for nothing - Harry I think you made the wrong judgment call seriously and no offense but the mother in law constantly hovering over them is not going to help this marriage one bit
). Between her dad's behaviour before the wedding and her half-sister desperately trying to push her tell-all book and gossipy interviews, I don't blame her for one second for keeping them thousands of miles away from the royal family.I know Prince Charles is big on sustainability and not one for splashy displays so maybe those are the "baptism" outfits they chose to use and reuse in a bid to show that royals don't wear one outfit and archive it?I don't get why Piers would need to explain haha
or is that just me 
I think all the answers are in William's face lolThey're saying the time shown is different from a close up of Prince William's watch. [emoji15] It totally could've happened at night tbh, with Meghan's obsession with secrecy.
Several people in the comments have followed these steps below and have confirmed it is indeed true.
Others have said that the baby in the black and white photo seems a couple months older (as he's able to kind of hold his head up) than he was in the one with all the guests. Looking closely and I completely agree.
What an absolute circus.
I was reading earlier that if a royal baby is delivered by a surrogate then the rules are he or she isnt allowed to have any formal royal title!!Ooh this is getting interesting. What would happen In this day and age tho if the baby was conceived out of wedlock? Is it frowned apon? Also can they put false information on a birth certificate? Or will it be one that’s been done for the public and they will have his real one at home in an old quality street tin and bottom of wardrobe
Oooh! See this theory is too juicy to let go...the lack of title would work with their "wanting a private life for their son".I was reading earlier that if a royal baby is delivered by a surrogate then the rules are he or she isnt allowed to have any formal royal title!!
Also a birth certificate is issued firstly with the birth mothers details on and then the biological parents have to apply for a new birth certificate with their names on...... But the application for the new birth certificate cannot be made for 6 weeks after the birth of the baby!!
I'm exactly the same, generally I laugh at conspiracy theories but there's so much about the pregnancy/birth/christening that doesn't add up.
ok, but what about me-again gaining all that weight?
That could simply be down to coming off her super-restricted Hollywood diet regime. If you look at her mum and dad she's genetically predisposed to carry a bit more weight. Kate looks like a naturally thin woman, like the rest of her family, but I suspect Meghan has had to work hard to stay slim.
The raw data and William’s watch show the same time. The clock on the mantle could be out if it hasn’t been changed regularly with BST and GMT changes.The clock in the background IS showing that time though.....
I think it’s more that piers is the most likely one to pipe up and stick his nose in who has a following to be honest to bring it to the wider audience.
