Harry and Meghan #97 Smeg wants us to believe what she says is real

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts
freda19

freda19

Carpediem69 said:


A blast from the past😉
Click to expand...
".... but she was more interested in becoming a supermodel." Yup, that figures, very pretty, tall slim and lively.
Which is exactly why I never bought into the theory that it was smeggy in those images.
Yacht girl Escat has good legs and smeggy has chicken legs. Despite smeggy claiming on her CV to be "a supermodel with amazingly long legs" there is not one body part of hers anywhere near super anything. Totally under par for modelling.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 29
clueless

clueless

the musician said:
But she still keeps going on about being "silenced" :rolleyes: It was obvious it became political when she had the likes of Jacinda Ardern and Michelle Obama on the cover. Her edition was about "using your own platform to bring change", so because of who she married, she should try and bring about change when she was a nobody before that🤦‍♀️

That's very true. What was her reason for not wanting to be on the cover like Catherine and Diana? Because she wanted to "focus on the women she admires" 🤮 so she'd rather guest edit. As for Edward, what a massive slap in the face to people who work hard for that position. How he thought it was a good idea is beyond me.
Click to expand...
Oh God remember that :sick: "forces for change"... virtue signaller of the highest order. And didn't she also say something along the lines of "being on the cover is self indulgent/boastful" - a not-so-subtle shot at Catherine for being on the cover of the centenary issue.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: 33
T

the musician

clueless said:
Oh God remember that :sick: "forces for change"... virtue signaller of the highest order. And didn't she also say something along the lines of "being on the cover is self indulgent/boastful" - a not-so-subtle shot at Catherine for being on the cover of the centenary issue.
Click to expand...
Then she also took a shot at her idol, who happens to be her late mother-in-law. Is guest editing a prestigious magazine not boastful? It's always about one-upmanship with Harry's wife but in the end she makes herself look worse than everyone
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 32
bubbadabut

bubbadabut

the musician said:
I thought that was her fake smile to act as if she was included in the conversation, when in reality no one wanted to talk to her
Click to expand...
That's the smile she reserves for when there's a rich bloke around. See also, Prince William, Alexis Ohanian, Anthony Joshua, et al...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 29
Cassandra333

Cassandra333

clueless said:
Oh God remember that :sick: "forces for change"... virtue signaller of the highest order. And didn't she also say something along the lines of "being on the cover is self indulgent/boastful" - a not-so-subtle shot at Catherine for being on the cover of the centenary issue.
Click to expand...
Lets revisit this:
Vogue have to admit they can't put Harry's wife on the cover because they've never seen her in anything that fits and she has appalling taste. She just isn't suitable for the Vogue cover. It's a matter of professionalism.

Harry's first wife throws massive tantrum, attacking Harry and anyone else who is stood by. But not the staff at Vogue. Because she wants to be involved with Vogue.

Staff who see the tantrum rush to put the fire out and someone suggests that she asks if she can edit the magazine instead.

Harry's ex first wife likes that idea and decides to run with it. Excellent opportunity to have a dig at Catherine and signal her own virtues at the same time.

Vogue allow her to edit the magazine thereby losing a lot of respect from the Industry and loss of credibility for themselves.

Historically this is known as one of the first instances of the 'Kiss of Death'. :LOL::LOL:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 34
monicalewinsky

monicalewinsky

clueless said:
Oh God remember that :sick: "forces for change"... virtue signaller of the highest order. And didn't she also say something along the lines of "being on the cover is self indulgent/boastful" - a not-so-subtle shot at Catherine for being on the cover of the centenary issue.
Click to expand...
Which cracked me up cos she basically did a VF cover in 2017, which essentially she only got because she was PWB’s girlfriend.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 33
T

the musician

monicalewinsky said:
Which cracked me up cos she basically did a VF cover in 2017, which essentially she only got because she was PWB’s girlfriend.
Click to expand...
Didn't she also get covers on Elle (one of the European ones, think it was France or Italy) and Mexican Vanity Fair too? How was all that even allowed? Or did Harry threaten his family with accusing them of being racist again so they had no choice?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
monicalewinsky

monicalewinsky

the musician said:
Didn't she also get covers on Elle (one of the European ones, think it was France or Italy) and Mexican Vanity Fair too? How was all that even allowed? Or did Harry threaten his family with accusing them of being racist again so they had no choice?
Click to expand...
She was in them! Not sure if they were reprints of an old shoot or something as I’m never sure with non-English fashion mags but the VF one was definitely her, the article screamed fame bleep.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 9
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.