I call that the Dusty Bin dress because that's what she looks like, an old style galvanised steel dustbin which someone's plonked on top of a hideous pair of legs (and ludicrous shoes for that matter).You missed this monstrosity which may well be the worst look I have seen on anyone. Ever. And why is she standing like that? Don’t they all practise their Hollywood glamour poses?!
View attachment 509504
Agreed except the poo emoji one looked perfect on her. Sh1thead.She most certainly doesn't have a head for hats.
I'm here doing my best oprahwhatOhh joy of joys!! They are the gift which keeps on giving!! If this true, they really have/are scraping the barrel!!
The Baby Part 2: The Deal - BLIND GOSSIP
SOLVED! UPDATED! [Blind Gossip] You may recall that this celebrity couple signed a very lucrative deal to produce TV shows. So… where are the shows? Have you heard about any specific projects? Want to hear about their first one? Here you go! They have their first project and it is going to be...blindgossip.com
Sorry if this has been posted already!!
How much more power can you have than being a black president or now vice president? Or billionaire TV mogul? Twats.Precisely. These people seem to confuse natural differences for racism. We are not one homogenous group, we all have differences, and that’s fine
People have prejudices and beliefs about lots of things, race, religion, gender, nationality. That does not make you a dangerous bigot, it makes you a human being.
I’m sure Black British people hold certain views about White British people, for example. That’s normal
Oh what’s that, black people can’t be racist because they don’t have the institutional power? Oh ok! (Load of crap)
Lucky legs, lucky they keep her up.I call that the Dusty Bin dress because that's what she looks like, an old style galvanised steel dustbin which someone's plonked on top of a hideous pair of legs (and ludicrous shoes for that matter).
You probably need to be of a certain age to remember Dusty Bin and 3-2-1!
View attachment 510107 View attachment 510109
So that is what the bump on her back was in that earlier photo a Harry tracking deviceI imagine woko sat in the cctv control room at moneycito mansions watching hazno wherever he goes. That's what she does all day!
I think in Smeg's head she and Catherine have, or had, some kind of Mean Girls "frenemy" thing going on where they're both turbocharged versions of the "popular girls" from American teen drama shit (only Smegs is, like, way more popular, obviously). When the reality is closer to Kate actually having mentally aged past the age of 16, and thereby having been grey rocking M like her life depended on it since the day her cloven hooves touched BP carpet. Secure, well-adjusted women of their age don't play well with the schoolgirl drama. I seriously doubt that whatever relationship exists between the "two duchesses" ever got past the cordial small-talk-for-family's-sake stage.No, that’s Meghan propaganda to make her look more popular and important than she is. You only have to see the photos of them at the polo match (or any of them together) to see Kate rightly didn’t trust or warm to Meghan, much less “bonded over motherhood” with her.
Lucky they don't snapLucky legs, lucky they keep her up.
Are you in the right thread? I don't understand the connection here, sorry. Maybe I'm just being thick? - Oh, ignore me, I was momentarily confusing Alex Beresford with Alex Belfield. I'm listening to Lady C. Apologies.A couple of years ago, Alex Beresford was campaigning against knife crime and tackling violence within the black community and a few days later his cousin was sadly stabbed to death. Surely as this has affected him personally, it would make more sense for him to continue helping with this subject rather than jumping on the bandwagon and accusing all of the UK of being racist.
Because Alex was defending Meghan. Keep upAre you in the right thread? I don't understand the connection here, sorry. Maybe I'm just being thick?
Honestly, I think I rather unfairly dismissed Lady C before - listening to The Real Diana is genuinely fascinating. Especially in light of everything going on currently. The part I’ve reached, she’s just now reeling off the tons of royals who’ve consulted psychiatrists, etc over the years freely and without thinking it at all a big deal. Hardly any of them haven’t it seems. They sound incredibly mental health aware and with a healthy, proactive approach to it, particularly when you think we’re talking pre mid eighties. It makes the Harkles’ lie about being denied help all the more ridiculous, annoying and frustrating.I have given up trying to keep up here. I had to choose Tattle or the family and they had lost the complete run of themselves... So.
Anyway, this has probably been said 100 times over but does anyone see Lady C as the Lady Whistledown of the modern world?
Yes, I've realised that. Obviously having a slow brain dayBecause Alex was defending Meghan. Keep up
Sorry, there was a conversation a few pages back on this thread talking about Alex Beresford and how he'd had to come off social media because he was getting abuse. He was doing a good thing a couple of years ago by drawing attention to knife crime, etc. so maybe he should have stuck to that rather than getting involved in the Meghan/Piers situation as he seems to have made himself quite unpopular by doing so.Are you in the right thread? I don't understand the connection here, sorry. Maybe I'm just being thick?
I really dislike this story and the account of William passing her tissues under the door. Parentification of a child is very damaging. Poor William. And he had to parent his younger brother too. i really don’t get why people say Diana was a wonderful mother. Making a child be your counsellor is basically emotional abuse.Plus by all accounts William saw much more of the flawed character practically acting as a counsellor to her. One wonders what her reaction to losing her HRH actually was that prompted William to tell her he would reinstate it when he was King
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?