I'm a lawyer, but not a constitutional lawyer. Until the lunacy of the Warby decision, I would have confidently advised that the law is not an ass and that common sense and fairness will usually get you there. On top of Meghan and Harry's lies, the summary judgement decision has therefore been particularly hard for me to deal with. But, anyhow - as far as treason goes, there are views that the law is outdated and that newer legislation (eg on terrorism) is more fit for purpose. However, in my view treason remains the correct way to describe the disloyalty to country shown by Harry. I have therefore written to Boris Johnson, to suggest that the correct response should be to remove Harry and his offspring from the succession. You might like to do the same.High Treason on the part of Prince Harry?
With his latest missives delivered through bosom buddy Omid Scobie, this could be an area to consider.
Prince Harry to use 'unprecedented' media tactic to pressure royals
THE ROYAL FAMILY is concerned by Prince Harry's unprecedented decisions to leak information about the Palace without its approval, as the rift between the two sides continues to escalate.www.express.co.uk
I am no constitutional lawyer, but it is looking increasingly like Prince Harry may be committing High Treason. In attacking the monarchy, he is in my opinion, doing just this by targeting his father - (the heir apparent) and also his brother Prince William. This could be construed as “attempting to undermine the lawfully established line of succession.”
This is punishable by life imprisonment.
Anyone else ?
Kate doesn’t need to lower herself or say a thing. Meghan’s lies are already unravelling. The saying “you give someone enough rope” comes to mindThere would be no point in Kate doing this. Whatever she'd say, the sugars would just retaliate with an arrogant: " That’s what all the racist bullies say"
I hope not and don't believe she would.I saw an a piece online earlier from Marie Claire magazine saying that Kate is reportedly going to break royal protocol with a statement in response to M's claims about her...It's Marie Claire, so I don't know how truthful that actually is, but it would be interesting
Screenshots following on from my last post (I don't know how to just link the article, apologies)
I know, it's fucking unbelievable isn't it!Imagine declaring to the World that you are actually blackmailing your own family! D'oh!
The Corgis are fighting back! (@Pom Bear)'Panic'? You are speaking for BP - the more the moaning millionaire Harkles put themselves out there, the less popular they are becoming.
I'm hoping they have a go at the Corgis next
As much as Charles has been pompous and arrogant at times, he wanted to marry Camilla and wasn’t allowed to. Diana was a lovely person and very charming, but he loved who he loved. It was sad and difficult for both.I feel for Prince Charles, tbh. He had a famously awful marriage but his son is in a far worse one & there’s nothing he can do about it.
I have a son & I’d be terrified if he ended up with someone like Markle.
... and if I'm not mistaken, William gave him the lion's share of his amount also only keeping approx two hundred and fifty thousand back for himself. What must it be like to have such a selfless brother? It's a pity William will never know.Diana said somewhere that her and most adults in the RF (except Anne apparently!) tried to lavish Harry with extra affection as they knew William would always be the important one, IIRC the Queen Mum left him more than Wills for the same reason.
I suspect she grills him after any interaction with his family like a narc I know used to do. Wants every minute detail of it. Feeds the paranoia and allows them to twist every little detail to turn the screws on the family.Also, if it was one conversation with either his dad or William. Why would Harry even tell her about it? Surely he would know it would upset her ands create animosity.
What with him being “ashamed“ of her MH issues, she should be questioning his love for her.
If Catherine responded to this tripe MM would be foaming at the mouth with delight like a rabid hyena. A back and forth slanting match would begin, as MM would reply and it would be a downward spiral detrimental to Catherine and boost MM's importance as being worthy of a response and more news headlines.As upset as Kate is İ don't think she will respond or be advised to respond with a statement. There are too many lies and distortions in everything MM states - she is not a reliable witness, she is laughable. TRF will focus on distancing themselves from the gruesome twosome and hopefully removing JCMH from the line of succession. The bullying investigation, whilst it may expose that BP could have handled things better from the complainants' points of view will hopefully prove that they tried to protect MM, and expose MM'S atrociously mean behaviour. They have to play the long game, and play the better role. William and Catherine need to maintain their regal dignity with positive and meaningful PR. Looking forward to the upcoming press article on Prince William - he really looks like a Prnce and future King in the photo they have used in the trailer (upthread).
That would be funny if it wasn't so true . You can also imagine her demanding that no one is allowed their mobile phones so no photos of Archie could be put out there that she couldn't cash in on. That's another thing, all the secrecy around his birth, his christening, his godparents, etc., it's just so unneccessary and hardly world changing information - it seems to be it's kids in playground stuff, nah nah, I know something you don't like she tried to do about the wedding three days before which backfired on her.Yes. She's psycho enough to turn up at the Monteceito Bunnikins Nursery flanked by RPO hunks with earbuds and Glocks, parading ahead of her a remote -controlled toddler. "Make way! Step aside! Her Royal Highness and Prince Flatpack coming through! Do not make eye contact! Repeat, no eye contact! Step away sir, hands on the car...on the ground now, madam, and you too, sir!"
In the Times podcast about the bullying investigation Valentine Low said that Catherine ‘never briefs, ever’ so she never talks to the press or let’s her reps talk to the press about anything to do with her. It would be very out of character for her to start now. Not sure what her stance is on the children, they have never been in the firing line until now.I saw a piece online earlier from Marie Claire magazine saying that Kate is reportedly going to break royal protocol with a statement in response to M's claims about her...It's Marie Claire, so I don't know how truthful that actually is, but it would be interesting
Screenshots following on from my last post (I don't know how to just link the article, apologies)
That Anne, such a wise bird. Anne grew up as not even the ‘spare’ once AndyPandy was born. She is well aware that syrupy-coating an acceptable truth that one is not going to be Top Corgi does not do any good. Instead she got on with being the very Anne that she is. No doubt, she enjoyed the privileges that were bestowed upon her & may have been a right madam growing up BUT she does not wallow in self pity, mucks out her own horses, works hard for the RF & speaks her own mind. She can see that spoiling Andrew has done his modest abilities no good & chose not to indulge Hazzard because she is a sensible woman.Diana said somewhere that her and most adults in the RF (except Anne apparently!) tried to lavish Harry with extra affection as they knew William would always be the important one, IIRC the Queen Mum left him more than Wills for the same reason.
The thing this person pointed out in their comment is actually one of the main issues with Meghan, and by extension Harry.I'm a fully-paid up member of the Lady C cult at the moment. Thinking of typing my posts on Tattle wearing an enormous brooch and a french-knotted silk scarf...
Her latest video tackling the Harkles' wedding
From the YouTube comments:
Hello from Santa Barbara, Ca! I’ve seen the grotesque couple driving around with a car full of security. Let me tell you, it’s not needed. No one here is chasing them. I’ve seen Ellen without security at the stores, Oprah in Downtown Santa Barbara without security. They look like normal people and don’t stand out. Being surrounded by security makes you stand out from the crowd. Most people wish those people would go because they ruin the atmosphere in a peaceful city.