And the problem with him staying there is that he’s totally isolated, with practically no method of earning a living, as presumably the Nexfix stuff will have bitten the dust long before then.People have been mentioning about Harry coming back to live in the UK if there was a divorce (or maybe living in Africa) but realistically, with two children involved - could he/ would he really leave America until they were at least 18?
There's no way Meghan would allow him to bring the children back to the UK with him full time and he has been portrayed as a doting Dad (we don't know if that's true due to so little photographic evidence) so would he want to be away from them for any period of time?
If the scales do eventually fall from his eyes and he sees Meghan for what she really is - I don't think he would leave her in charge of raising their children.
You need Harry and Charles face on, and then you can see the likeness in their eyes and nose.I'm scared of posting these as expect someone,somewhere over the rainbowhas probably posted these and I expect the whole 'who's the daddy?' think is as dull as Meghan is when she gives one of her woke lectures, but I think these blurred (sorry) photos are very interesting. I know Diana apparently didn't meet James Hewitt until after Harry was born, but...
I've included a photo comparing Harry to Charles Spencer and I personally don't find that massively convincing.
A thousand, thousand, thousand etc apologies if I have contributed to the misery of anyone by posting these, but how do we actually know what has been said before when there's often 50+ pages per thread and lots of threads? I do try to look, but it's moving quickly still and I now find myself feeling quite scared about posting anything at all.
I think he looks a lot like the Spencers and the royals to be fair. But the big thing I wanted to say is DON’T feel scared to post anything. You post away. No one here is the thread police. I, for one, am interested in what you have to say and even if I wasn’t, I defend your right to say it.I'm scared of posting these as expect someone,somewhere over the rainbowhas probably posted these and I expect the whole 'who's the daddy?' think is as dull as Meghan is when she gives one of her woke lectures, but I think these blurred (sorry) photos are very interesting. I know Diana apparently didn't meet James Hewitt until after Harry was born, but...
I've included a photo comparing Harry to Charles Spencer and I personally don't find that massively convincing.
A thousand, thousand, thousand etc apologies if I have contributed to the misery of anyone by posting these, but how do we actually know what has been said before when there's often 50+ pages per thread and lots of threads? I do try to look, but it's moving quickly still and I now find myself feeling quite scared about posting anything at all.
'Panic'? You are speaking for BP - the more the moaning millionaire Harkles put themselves out there, the less popular they are becoming.I've just had a news notification of PANIC! at the palace over new clips.
I've been obsessed for a couple of years but even I rolled my eyes and thought "who gives a shit", the rest of the world must be sick of 'em. Excluding Muricans who clearly have nothing to do except get angry over a white woman married to a rich white colonial money having racist.
There I said it
Unfortunately a lot of men stay in abusive relationships for the children, they stay to try and protect their children because they are afraid if they leave they will never see them again. Women in many cases are still the preferred custodial parent, and if they are abusive they lie, the father getting custody is very hard. However given so much of Meghan's behaviour is public and that there are photos that could indicate she physically abused Harry together with the bullying allegations he may have a good chance of getting custody.People have been mentioning about Harry coming back to live in the UK if there was a divorce (or maybe living in Africa) but realistically, with two children involved - could he/ would he really leave America until they were at least 18?
There's no way Meghan would allow him to bring the children back to the UK with him full time and he has been portrayed as a doting Dad (we don't know if that's true due to so little photographic evidence) so would he want to be away from them for any period of time?
If the scales do eventually fall from his eyes and he sees Meghan for what she really is - I don't think he would leave her in charge of raising their children.
Sickeningly sweet?I cannot stand the expressions "Emergency Black" and just saw someone use "House Black" to describe the bloke in the article on Twitter, I mean really?! I fucking hate them Sugars. Where did they get named Sugars anyway I don't get it?
Yes. She's psycho enough to turn up at the Monteceito Bunnikins Nursery flanked by RPO hunks with earbuds and Glocks, parading ahead of her a remote -controlled toddler. "Make way! Step aside! Her Royal Highness and Prince Flatpack coming through! Do not make eye contact! Repeat, no eye contact! Step away sir, hands on the car...on the ground now, madam, and you too, sir!"She's actually complained about not being able to take Archie to nursery or let him mix with other children because she's too famous - talk about delusional. I've said before, Kate manages to do the school run, pop into the local Sainsburys, was seen in the local Waterstones, etc. and she's married to and is the mother of future kings. Meghan just makes herself sound ludicrous by saying all this - I bet if she went out, dressed down and without loads of security around her like Kate does when she's not on duty, no one would take the slightest bit of notice of her. Everything she does is for maximum attention and 'look at me'. Look what she was like at Wimbledon when firstly she thought she was too important to follow the dress code so turned up in jeans so couldn't go in the royal box and then had the stand emptied and her security stopping people taking pictures of her, even though they weren't which was embarrassing!
Gives me hope that the truth will finally set us free from the Harkles.Well you speak for me. I'm bored shitless reading people's experiences on twitter. I just don't give a rat's ass.
It clutters up what was once a good sugar-free trans-free terf-free thread. If I want to read sugar shite I'll go look for it.
I'm biting my tongue, believe it or not.
Anyhoo, back on topic. Found this, from a guy who does specialist news stories, very niche stuff that involves actual work re digging and delving (important later in the post). Not mainstream and I doubt we'd recognise his name, even if he gave his real one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A basic tenet of news reporting is the Right to Reply. In other words, you cannot publish an allegation without giving the other party an opportunity to respond. Even if they say 'No comment' you've discharged your duty in that respect. But - and this is important - you cannot publish without a response.
But TV is slightly different. What happened on TV at the beginning of the week was one-sided and I'll politely describe some of what was said as dubious.
There was no immediate right to reply, nor did Winfrey come anywhere close to hard questioning - much less informed questioning. We got schmaltz-wrapped character assassination. I don't believe Markle because she's not believable. And not because of skin colour. I don't believe her because of her past record, a great deal of which is out there not too far from the surface of the internet. And there's only so much you can keep a cap on with injunctions and by being overly litigious.
Buckingham Palace, in some ways, gave the green light to some good, old-fashioned journalism (yes, it does exist). There's plenty out there on Markle and we may yet see some of it emerge in the coming weeks. It ought to.
Oh dear, it does look a bit close to an uncomfortable ‘truth’. I can see glimpses of William in Charles Spencer which echoes how much W takes after Diana. Thing is most of us have seen very little photographic records of the RF elders when they were younger so mapping Harry & who he resembles is not so straight forward. Were we to see a future aged Harry, then his Windsoreyness might be more distinct.I'm scared of posting these as expect someone,somewhere over the rainbowhas probably posted these and I expect the whole 'who's the daddy?' think is as dull as Meghan is when she gives one of her woke lectures, but I think these blurred (sorry) photos are very interesting. I know Diana apparently didn't meet James Hewitt until after Harry was born, but...
I've included a photo comparing Harry to Charles Spencer and I personally don't find that massively convincing.
A thousand, thousand, thousand etc apologies if I have contributed to the misery of anyone by posting these, but how do we actually know what has been said before when there's often 50+ pages per thread and lots of threads? I do try to look, but it's moving quickly still and I now find myself feeling quite scared about posting anything at all.
Totally agree!Whilst we’re requesting things, could I request that people read to the end of the thread before posting articles? We keep seeing the same ones posted over and over again, which would be avoided, if someone got to the end first!
Oprah is not an interviewer, she is a chat show host.I just want to point out you can ignore a member on here. I don't see how writing about 5 posts about someone is any better than moaning about some photos?
Not everyone has twitter so I don't see a problem posting something that's not on here, Again ignore the user so you don't see their posts. This is a Harry and Meghan thread. The same people moaning about clogging up posts will write several essays on the subject. We are here to discuss Harry and Meghan not turn on each other. I love your posts @mb1202
Can I join you, I will don a ginger wig and whinge in a poncey plummy voice?I've bought this dress and intend to sit in my garden wearing ludicrous high heels in a size too big, having used 5 eyeliners on my eyes so I can barely see and spend the afternoon slagging off the RF, dabbing away invisible tears and telling H he needs to put a bike basket on his bike and go and collectSimonArchie for our 3-4 pm slot.
The Corgis are fighting back! (@Pom Bear)'Panic'? You are speaking for BP - the more the moaning millionaire Harkles put themselves out there, the less popular they are becoming.
I'm hoping they have a go at the Corgis next
I think Warby is ruling on something tomorrow in the ANL case but I've lost track of what was happening. He let the biggest liar since Maxwell off the hook so let's hope normal ferocious and forensic scrutiny resumes.Excellent post this. On the surface it looks like an admission that the RF need to change, and the sugaz will go wild thinking their Kweene was right. By doing this the RF has taken the sting out of this heated situation. In the meantime though MM's lies are being exposed by the press one by one and once you're caught out lying everything else you claim is suspect. MM is losing credibility very fast, and though she may try to shore herself up with unseen Whale interview footage, the rot is setting in from below and her base is crumbling fast.
If ANL win their right to appeal she will be toast, exposed for the fraud she is. I bet Warby is turning in his wig and that Welby has egg on his surplice. Serves them both right, the tools.
The Country is 84% white, there is no getting away from that so ensuring that all public bodies appear diverse basically means that any jobs will end up being heavily weighted towards minorities. The sooner we get away from all this and can start hiring based on ability the better. I work in an industry where hiring practicies are aimed at making sure that no one can claim any discrimination, the result of that is that an awful lot of people end up with jobs they aren't suitable for because the process is so formulaic that it is easy to work the system.I think Warby is ruling on something tomorrow in the ANL case but I've lost track of what was happening. He let the biggest liar since Maxwell off the hook so let's hope normal ferocious and forensic scrutiny resumes.
Agree that BP telling the public they are taking a look at their diversity policies is a good strategic move. Markle was able to threaten them with the race card partly because they didn't have many wiley senior officials who also happened to be BAME. If their top team were more diverse, her nonsense wouldn't have gone anywhere.
Why stop at three? MM has a multiple personality disorder so there will have been several other women in the marriage causing problems between her and her beloved - fighting, arguing, spreading rumours and giving black eyes and biting !Will a future page in her story be lies about Harry having an affair, 'there are three of us in this marriage'? I wonder who she will cast as the other woman.
So sorry to hear that, and glad you got out in one piece. Stay on here where it's safe.Woah I've just been on Twitter. I barely made it out alive. How is it that black people can insult, threaten and abuse white people, but it isn't racism? They are so angry. Genuinely I feel a bit shaky.I was only telling them to stop shaming Prince William's lack of hair!
I'm deleting my account. I am NOT going back there again!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?