So are we to believe Meghan had no recourse until now? No friend or surrogate who could set the record straight? She is, after all, famously litigious when it comes to the British tabloids — you know, the ones she claims not to read.
Tempting, very tempting...Soooo, is anyone who live streamed last night going on for round two tonight to let the dissection begin??
When the last Deb balls were happening at BP in 1958, Princess Margaret apparently approved of them being cancelled and said "every tart in London is getting in!"This is what happens when debutante balls are no longer a thing.......
I feel like now we can watch it with a more critical mind and less heightened emotions... Who am I kidding, I'll still nearly lose my head againTempting, very tempting...
I feel sorrier for Harry with each day. He was taken apart from his family; his roots and his childhood. Of course it was his own choice to cut ties with the RF, but let’s be real, it was all for Megan. Let’s wait till a few years pass and all this glory of fame and love is washed away. What will he be left with? I’m sure he hasn’t regretted his decision to follow her at least once.
I don’t believe that Meghan had “never read or heard about the RF prior to meeting Harry. On the interview, she mentioned hanging out with Harry’s relative and them having double dates with her and her boyfriend, and that she had already been friends with this person before meeting Harry. (I don’t remember the particular royal’s name). Isn’t that a little self-contradictory?
Probably not because he is a selfish twitToday I thought of the two cambridge children that go to school. Their first day back to school. Harry lived the horror of having your family drama in the news and being commented by the others. Did he think of them today?
I was thinking the same, a calm and concise viewing... but then I just watched that clip above my and my blood pressures rising again!I feel like now we can watch it with a more critical mind and less heightened emotions... Who am I kidding, I'll still nearly lose my head again
and this allows them to fact check his presence at the baptism in Windsor AND the General Synod in York at the same timeShe probably meant they had an intimate blessing but she's dropped Welby right in it if it turns out that they actually did the whole thing twice, not allowed by the Church of England, even if they didn't sign anything.
That's why "supporters" were hastily clarifying that it was nothing official. And the reason why it's actually a key piece in showing that "her truth" doesn't actually have to be you know, FACTUAL.
Meg didn’t actually give any context to the remark about Archie’s skin colour. It literally could have been “I wonder whose colouring the baby will have”?. His dad is a ginger with pale skin and she is mixed ace do it was fairly obvious the baby wouldn’t be dark. She was obviously passed off that Archie wasn’t getting a title and security.Where did he say that ?
By mentioning Kate negatively at every turn she WAS inviting people to hate on her. That's how manipulative narcissists work and it's a shame some people wilfully turn a blind eye to it.Well, at least she said Kate's a good person and that she is not inviting people to hate on her.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?