You can and it’s grim - don’t! The recap is all anyone needs to know!!Years ago Charles told Camilla in a phone call that he wanted to be her tampon. It was a tapped line, the press recorded and released it and everyone laughed about it, except, presumably the BRF. If you run a google search I'm pretty sure you can hear the actual phone call.
THIS. I was talking to my husband about the utter damage/danger it could bring upon the RF. Especially given all the BLM riots (we live in America) did Hazard not think this some insane wokeys might try something? So sad. They are both so far each others arsesCan you share tweets, so we can all report them?
I don't like either of them.When someone talks about their suicidal feelings, it’s a bit of a conversation stopper and not something you can easily disprove. Even to challenge it feels a bit queasy. However I do note that although Meghan felt suicidal 5 months into her pregnancy and was denied residential treatment in a facility, one month later she was jetting off to NYC for her baby shower beaming from ear to ear so seemed to have recovered somewhat. Sorry if someone’s already made this point, the thread moves too fast!
And the fact Oprah let them get away with floating racism from the RF about Archie’s skin colour without delving into context etc is appalling. Also no questions about Meghan's family or her staff leaving in droves (as was known about at the time of the interview) does suggest it wasn’t exactly no-holds barred.
Not quite, titles 99.9% of the time can't be inherited through the female line. Anne's children would never have been prince or princess. Prior to her wedding the Queen offered her husband to be an earldom, which he refused. Had he accepted they would have been Lord and lady like Princess Margaret's children. She married someone untitled but he was created an Earl by the Queen. Special exception was made for the queen's four children as she was heir presumptive for many years.The titles are inherited by birth into the RF. the children of the reigning monarch are Princes and Princesses, as with Charles,Anne,Andrew and Edward. Then their children are also given Pr or Princess titles ( Anne refused them for Peter and Zara her children) but the children of the grandchildren are not titled.
Except for William's 3 children who are Prince George,Princess Charlotte and Prince louis...due to the fact that they are in the direct line of succession... and will one day be children of the King of England and eventually George will be king and his children will be Prince and Princess ..
Meghan was using the race word yet again, which I find appalling as she refered to her own child.... whatever colour the child is he would have a title if he or she were in the direct line of succession.Harry is the second son of Charles so his children do not automatically get titles as it is not likely that either Harry or Archie will be king.
From The Times
Meghan told Oprah Winfrey there had been “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born” while she was pregnant with Archie.
I don’t understand what “concerns and conversations” means???? What was the conversation Meeeeegain?
Kate: “I’m concerned about how dark the colour of the baby’s skin will be when it’s born?”
Or
Will “let’s have a conversation about how dark your baby’s skin will be when it’s born?”
Of course the fuck not.
Even racists don’t have “concerns” about the colour of people’s skin. It’s either a colour they want it to be or not. They are not “concerned” about it.
Yet again this witch has used her weasel words to tell (what I believe) is a tale based on something entirely different.
I have 2 children. I am mixed race, my children are mixed race, my husband is brown haired, when he was young he was Blond. Blond blond and blue eyed.
It runs in his family, all the babies are very blond and piecing blue eyes. My mother in law said to my mother when I was pregnant, “oh this baby will be blond haired and blue eyed”...(she is not racist). My mother said “no way. This baby will be like our side of the family, brown skin, brown eyes, brown hair”.
I was pretty sure my mother was correct, as my dad had blue hair and blond hair and both myself and my brother dark hair,dark eyes, dark skin”.
well, blow me down - my daughter blond as blond with bright blue eyes.
The truth is most people ask about what babies will look like to expectant parents. My brother’s wife is ginger....we had a lot of chats about whether their kids would be ginger or not. They are.
I would not consider myself or my family racist. I believe it is more than possible thr RF (like all families) discussed what the baby would look like - this does not mean it was a racist discussion.
Today’s coverage has been very depressing.But I am hoping beyond hope by Wednesday this will be over: their final swan song. Most of what she said will be fact checked (it has to be because otherwise they will sue) and the truth will out.
I believe the RF will weather the storm, but really, should they have to? The two of them should be ASHAMED of themselves. I hope they never show their faces back here.
Having looked up the urban dictionary meanings wtf are they up to dropping these words in under the laughable guise of A's first and favourite words. Not joking it gives me an uneasy feeling. Especially on top of the infamous engagement vegan roast chicken"Hydrate" and "drive safely". Just to add to "crocodile" "roast chicken " and "waffle maker". Maybe that was why part of the interview took place in a chicken coop with rescued rotissrie chickens?
Spot on!!! Let’s not forget that other “royal” women have gone through similar experiences. I’m not saying that some of her experiences were not racially motivated but it looks more sexists than anything else. All the women who join the royal family are given a hard time in one way or another.I find it offensive that some black (people of colour)? commentators on tv suggest that because I am white I cannot relate to racism. What utter bollocks. There is something called 'empathy', an ability to sympathise with another person in different shoes -primarily from reading or hearing first-hand accounts from reliable sources (ie: Not Meghan). Put it this way, Agatha Christie (for example) wrote many acclaimed novels about murder, she was able to portray murderers very well ... yet she didn't f*cking murder anyone did she? She wasn't a murderer herself.
That awful shouty rude Shola woman on TV is cut from the same cloth as the professionally offended nutjobs who accuse white people who cook Chinese Food of 'Cultural Appropriation'. Best ignore psychopaths like that, whose only interest is shilling their crappy book.
The plan for a slimmed down monarchy has been well known since the 1990s. It was the reason the Wessex kids are styled as children of an Earl. Andrew was reportedly less than pleased his girls would not be working members but with people getting older and the Sussex drama they may need to be drafted in if even on a part time basis. Harry's children were never envisaged to be working royalsDid meghan know of charles plans to slim down the RF when he became king? Dim wit and meg would have been part of that by all accounts. It was to be the boys, their kids and Anne's family basically. Did meg not want go wait? I think Harry's paranoia has fuelled alot of this. For the man that is some hero of the day, he didnt prepare her at all for royal life. Hes always been outspoken and the RF have always covered for him. If he knew the place was that riddles with racism why did he not step back before they got married to save her from it all? I didnt realise how little amount of time they were together before they got married. I think they wanted the stage, the titles and privilege but not abide by the rules of the job. They wanted to change it up but only the monarch can really do that. They also seem to be indicating the queen really isnt in charge. I also find it hard to believe she couldn't get mental health help outside of the palace. Diana did, plus her husband and his family are patrons of a mental health charity! Its baffling.
They used a clip of the Africa documentary with Tom Bradby 'Thank you for asking if I am OK'. Think that was the giveaway.Not going to watch tonight having got the general gist from here but two questions
1. What bit of ITV footage was used? Chris Shitt implies they had asked for footage so that was how he revealed it.
2. Harry seems like one of those people that get sucked into a sect and knows they can’t escape. No sympathy for the shit but I wonder if there are plans to kidnap and deprogram him.
I had to look up the same.. wow. No wordsHaving looked up the urban dictionary meanings wtf are they up to dropping these words in under the laughable guise of A's first and favourite words. Not joking it gives me an uneasy feeling. Especially on top of the infamous engagement vegan roast chicken
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?