Unless she's got cast iron proof she'll never divulge anything directly because she's not been successfully sued yet.Except she usually does tell you...
Just not directly.
Unless she's got cast iron proof she'll never divulge anything directly because she's not been successfully sued yet.Except she usually does tell you...
Just not directly.
I mainly watch for her il Duce impressions, "they're so klassy."Unless she's got cast iron proof she'll never divulge anything directly because she's not been successfully sued yet.
My first thought is she is wearing some kind of padding beneath her top. Not enough to be a moonbump but maybe so the effects of Ozempic are reduced?
Absolutely this.The picture serves zero purpose for the child.
That child is not happy to meet "Meghan Markle". He is not on the receiving end of aid or anything else, so why was he dragged out of his bed (which he clearly desperately needs) to take a picture like this? He looks miserable, drowsy, on meds or even in some kind of pain.
And the parents? They are not ashamed of subjecting their child to this?
This is a disgrace.
Archie and Lilibet would never be subjected to this, but these parents and this hospital think it's okay for other children to be in such discomfort just so that Meghan can compete with Catherine?
View attachment 2855160
And yet, in another one she looks like Quasimodo or a badly stuffed sofa.Absolutely this.
Plus who in their right mind would think an arched back, tits forward & sultry stare at the camera is an appropriate way to pose next to a child
Absolutely this.
Plus who in their right mind would think arched back, tits forward & sultry stare at the camera is an appropriate way to pose next to a child
Just look at her faceThe picture serves zero purpose for the child.
That child is not happy to meet "Meghan Markle". He is not on the receiving end of aid or anything else, so why was he dragged out of his bed (which he clearly desperately needs) to take a picture like this? He looks miserable, drowsy, on meds or even in some kind of pain.
And the parents? They are not ashamed of subjecting their child to this?
This is a disgrace.
Archie and Lilibet would never be subjected to this, but these parents and this hospital think it's okay for other children to be in such discomfort just so that Meghan can compete with Catherine?
View attachment 2855160
Memes Grandad, see the similarities!
Yes, a very good post.
I hope that it's been re-tweeted to Buck House/Clarence House.
Way past time that the King and his people stopped this vicious abuse. They certainly should not be leaving the issue to demonstrably sane, sensible and articulate folks like us to fight their corner.
Good to know also that Canellecitadelle reads here as well! I imagine she has a wide following, and the more people who read what we're all saying, the better.
Except she usually does tell you...
Just not directly.
What is Taz, her publicist now or something?View attachment 2855294
According2Taz says she interviewed Lady C yesterday at Goring ahead of the book's release and here she is intimating there are bombs dropped????! Fingers crossed.
Excellent point @TheCutiePatootieThe picture serves zero purpose for the child.
That child is not happy to meet "Meghan Markle". He is not on the receiving end of aid or anything else, so why was he dragged out of his bed (which he clearly desperately needs) to take a picture like this? He looks miserable, drowsy, on meds or even in some kind of pain.
And the parents? They are not ashamed of subjecting their child to this?
This is a disgrace.
Archie and Lilibet would never be subjected to this, but these parents and this hospital think it's okay for other children to be in such discomfort just so that Meghan can compete with Catherine?
View attachment 2855160
We really need a side eye reaction emoji. I'm so fed up of these so called experts spouting NOTHING. Just get on with the job at hand and expose the fecking truth!Lady C live interview with Avid Gardener. Wonder if any reveals?
ETS: as this goes on, am guessing no big reveal in the book. She just said she has stuck to the facts and not made personal assumptions.
Wouldn't Harry be standing with Diana?For your amusement....
Popped up on my FB feed from a Diana page, lets just ignore that they've swapped out an elderly Camilla for a Diana that was almost certainly younger than her sons and their wives in this photo.
PMSL
"Artist interpretation of what might have been."
View attachment 2855305
Ok, update - I've listened to a bit of the interview with Avid kindly posted above - the bit about the bump seems to be more of the same for us. But I guess it's in a book saying Smeg needs to explain the many discrepancies and I guess hoping the media pick up on those questions?View attachment 2855294
According2Taz says she interviewed Lady C yesterday at Goring ahead of the book's release and here she is intimating there are bombs dropped????! Fingers crossed.
Wouldn't Harry be standing with Diana?
And il Duce sitting next to Charles - no doubt wearing all the crown jewels (seeing as it is an informal picture)