Harry and Meghan #41 turning tricks, see it all on Netflix.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Thing is I can't stand Andrew, he's always been an arrogant jerk but until it's proved the he has done something illegal there's no reason to remove his titles.

He didn't show any empathy or regard for the girls that's true, but being an obnoxious up his own arse isn't a reason for him to lose his titles either. We've had many vile monarchs over the years (being a nice person doesn't seem to be in the job description).

Anyway Haznoballs doesn't appear to be a nice person either, perhaps it's the curse of being the second son? but you are right that Andrew has used his title for profit over the years.

I don't think that either Andrew or Harry will lose their titles however much people complain. They were both born Princes and Meghan will probably be treated exactly the same as Sarah.
 
Reactions: 25
Well having the name Prince does not automatically mean you are a nice person..or even deserving the title..I have a little rescue dog from Montenegro called Prince..he could really teach them a massive lesson in humility and gratitude..but they are too up their own arses to care.
 
Reactions: 19
Andrew is not a known pedophile. As I said, he has not been charged with anything, or found guilty of anything. If & when that happens, his titles can be looked at.
I think the @thegirlscout was referring to Andrew. The sentence misses a "not". Hence her mentioning Andrew having a stroll with Epstein in a park in NYC.
 
Reactions: 5
I don't particularly like him either Scotch, and I think he's a bit thick as well as being arrogant and entitled. But innocent until proven guilty and all that, it's yet to be proved any person he had any dalliances with were under age (sometimes people forget that the age of consent is 16 in the uk, unless in a position of trust, in which case it's 18, and in the US it varies between 16-18 depending on what state).

Who's to say Hazno has never had alliances with folk liking younger women, or indeed messed about himself, until people are found to be guilty of a crime, no-one can say. X
 
Reactions: 14
He was put out on the street at 6 weeks old to fend for himself..these too entitled arrogant idiots have no idea what happens in the real world..dont forget...MeAgain..left her rescue dogs behind..says it all really.
 
Reactions: 21
He was put out on the street at 6 weeks old to fend for himself..these too entitled arrogant idiots have no idea what happens in the real world..dont forget...MeAgain..left her rescue dogs behind..says it all really.
Awww.... I like you Charlie X bless you, as an animal lover myself, I cannot stand any cruelty to animals. That's another reason I don't like Merkin, how could she leave her dogs behind, if it's true she'd adopted them from a rescue place. Animals are for life, not just until one needs to move to bag oneself a ginger prince. I'm that soft I feed all the hedgehogs that come in my garden, we've had some of them coming for 5 years now
 
Reactions: 19
Can I ask some questions that are probably extremely offensive? And I apologize in advance (I am sitting here cleaning my guns, watching the news, so you can probably guess I’m not the most sophisticated person) Why would PC or Haznoballs buy a mansion of any value and put it in that thing’s name, why not Archiedoll’s? Why would the RF allow a prince to marry a hooker? Why is everyone calling Andrew a pedophile, when he is just a typical spoiled rich man? Why does everyone want to take away the duchess title, when that is EXACTLY what the bitch wants so she can call herself a princess? Why does ANYONE actually think the SMEG has a possibility of a flying frogs fat ass of a chance in politics in the US? (That one is particularly hysterical) I apologize for the interruption. I lurk to learn! I adore the vocabulary lessons in particular
 
Reactions: 37
I love my animals..especially dogs..love me love my dog rings true..hugs chick x
Me too...... I've got a massive dog and a beautiful 10 year old cat too, love them to bits. Have a hug back, just for being an animal person

Welcome I don't think you need any answers to those questions, you've got the answers yourself already really haven't you don't apologise for joining in, all welcome here for a healthy debate about the pair of 'freda words'
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 20
Andrew is not a known pedophile. As I said, he has not been charged with anything, or found guilty of anything. If & when that happens, his titles can be looked at.
My apologies! I just re read what I wrote and it didn’t make sense. I meant ‘they have not been seen out in public with a known pedophile like Andrew’ and I should have also included that I was referring to Andrew being photographed with Epstein in the park.

I think the @thegirlscout was referring to Andrew. The sentence misses a "not". Hence her mentioning Andrew having a stroll with Epstein in a park in NYC.
Yes, you’re correct! I massively messed up with missing out a word and the structure of that comment!
 
Reactions: 11
Yes that's what I meant I don't know what the equivalent of MI5/MI6 is in America. I get confused between the CIA and the FBI
So basically I meant intelligence agencies.
No worries it just made me laugh to think of Seal Team 6 dumpster diving at chaz Harkle

For clarification:
MI5 = FBI
MI6 = CIA
GCHQ = NSA

The CIA is not allowed to operate on US soil.
The NSA is not allowed to spy on US citizens communications. They get GCHQ to do that for them
 
Reactions: 13
I rather like the idea that the CIA investigates 'cunts in action' . There, I said the Freda word!
 
Reactions: 19
BIB no, she didn’t. Letters Patent were issued removing it.
 
Reactions: 11
We definitely will not see the BRF taking action to strip H&M of their titles. Not without them being sentenced with a crime in a legal court. The Prince is almost untouchable. The HRH is still intact but it is agreed they won’t use it (same as Andrew). The other titles will stay as long as Andrew hold onto his.
I think they are in desperate need of new rule book regarding their titles. Andrew should have lost his for his shady business deals, shamelessly exploit his royal status decades ago. So do ex-partners. Harry and Meghan should loose theirs for being out if the family business. Those titles are only important inside the royal universe. Just being a shitty human is not a very good reason as it almost impossible to clearly define general rules that are not up for interpretations.
 
Reactions: 15

You are SO Murican. Mo5 and pixilated will love you. What is it they say OORAH!
Welcome to the thread.
 
Reactions: 26
What a brilliant post!!! Thanks for the laugh, I needed that. Like you, I too, am flabbergasted that Morticia Windsor imagines she has a cats chance in hell of a career in Politics.

It just goes to show what having a billionaire father-in-law can pay for in terms of outright lyin' self promotion ...

An old army vet once me that there are at least two levels of dark ops below MI5 & MI6 that no one talks about, he said their names but I've forgotten them, do you you know them?
 
Reactions: 12

You are SO Murican. Mo5 and pixilated will love you. What is it they say OORAH!
Welcome to the thread.
I'm not murican, but I'll sit in the corner with them. I likes me clay shoots, could never go a real live hunting like, but like to keep my kit all oiled up ready for an outing down the range
 
Reactions: 16
We generally keep them in the safe. But recently....we keep them a bit closer. things have been dicey around here. Not so much where we live, exactly. But, to be ready is always a Veteran’s way. And yes, HOOAH! (Air Force here )
 
Reactions: 22
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.