Harry and Meghan #41 turning tricks, see it all on Netflix.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Why is there no gif of the Hugh/Colin fight in Bridget Jones??!?
Because both of the actors are idiots who think that their political views are somehow important? A bit like H&M, really.

A few knock backs for her and it won’t be too long before we increasingly hear how Harry is actually to blame for everything then - Harryvederci!
Excellent word!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
Surely this has to be acknowledged by all who have signed creative contracts with Netflix. If they don’t condemn this film and Netflix for allowing this to be on the platform, then they lose any little credibility that they had. This can’t be worse timing for the Markles, of course they won’t say a thing because they got the money they so desperately craved.
I wonder if HM will be notified of this though?
No surprises to see the Harkles and particularly 'feminist' Meghan shown up as complete hypocrites over the Netflix / Cuties scandal. Not. A. Word.

Now is the time for her to 'use her voice' that the evil RF silenced for so many long years for about 18 months with the support of an expensive press team and US PR from the Sunshiners. Would be good to see the vile Sussexbots sent out to tweet energetically about 'p3do NetFlix' or can they only do that when they are smearing the RF?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 24
The only thing really worth money is a warts and all documentary / film of Diana. Meghan will have the thumbscrews on Harry to deliver it.
As a sweetener for delivering she will be allowed to make some word salad puff stuff (on a cheap budget) so she will push, push, push and be taping every single thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
The only thing really worth money is a warts and all documentary / film of Diana. Meghan will have the thumbscrews on Harry to deliver it.
As a sweetener for delivering she will be allowed to make some word salad puff stuff (on a cheap budget) so she will push, push, push and be taping every single thing.
Good call! And right on cue.... Harkles PR are going into 'distract with Diana' mode with 'Happiest Ever Harry' birthday PR (Sssh don't mention the p3do-themed films on Netflix) They've decided, all in the best possible taste, to link Harry turning 36 with that being Princess Diana's age when she died. More material for their Diana documentary on Netflix? So out pops Katie Nicholl to push that gruesome theme.

His celebrations on 15 September in the company of his wife, the Duchess of Sussex, and their one-year-old son, Archie, are sure to be filled with love and joy. But there will also be a degree of sadness to Harry’s special day, as his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, was the same age when she lost her life in that fatal car crash in Paris.

“I imagine it will be quite poignant and significant for Harry that he’s the same age as his own mother was when she died,” royal commentator Katie Nicholl tells OK!.

“Diana had achieved such a huge amount by her 36th birthday. She’d shaken up the monarchy, rewritten the rule book and become the most successful and loved philanthropist on the planet. When Harry was 18, he vowed to continue the work his mother had started, so I think he’ll probably be asking himself on his birthday this year, ‘Have I achieved that at 36?’”


Then Katie moves on into straight fantasy propaganda

Katie believes the change of lifestyle has done Harry the world of good. “I think he looks happier, more settled and more in control. He really is a different man today. He’s grown up, but then he couldn’t be The Party Prince forever.”

Everyone else who has been watching their Zooms sees a man falling apart on camera month by month: thin, pale, unkempt, unhappy, confused, rapidly-balding, terrible teeth and generally looking in urgent need of an intervention.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Sad
Reactions: 27
I meant to write something with this post but got called away. Anyway the point is that if there is still stuff like this floating around the internet, then how on earth does Smeggy think that she can go into politics?

Meghan has had a good stab at eradicating her past and it's said that the palace fixit fairies may also have done some erasing, but there's always someone out there that has your porn video and sexy pictures.😉

If Smeggy tried to go into politics surely the special forces in the USA would be able to dig up a pile of dirt on her. She wouldn't be able to stand up to scrutiny when challenged with real evidence
Special Forces are elite military combat units (Seals, Delta etc). Do you possibly mean someone else? Like the FBI?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
The other day my mother n law told my daughter "I'm gonna whip your fanny if you don't knock it off"......oh man did I laugh......and had a "omg I think I peed" moment. Mother n law was looking at me all crazy and I just told her, "please don't ever say that again.....it doesn't mean what you think it does....at least now that I know the alternative!" 🤦🏻‍♀️


YESSSSSSS 🤤:love::m
Lol! So funny 😂
I was telling a friend this morning how you have been so quick to pick up expletives!
The context was that I've just learnt that " root" is the Aussie word for "f*ck". You have to be so careful these days!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 14
Special Forces are elite military combat units (Seals, Delta etc). Do you possibly mean someone else? Like the FBI?
Yes that's what I meant 😁 I don't know what the equivalent of MI5/MI6 is in America. I get confused between the CIA and the FBI 😁
So basically I meant intelligence agencies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
If Snarkle really did falsify her age as Bookworm's video says, would that make the marriage invalid? I believe it's a criminal offence to lie on a marriage licence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
If Snarkle really did falsify her age as Bookworm's video says, would that make the marriage invalid? I believe it's a criminal offence to lie on a marriage licence.
It's all very confusing because her birth is definitely registered as 1981. Someone checked on one of those ancestry websites and it was discussed on a previous thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Why do you think that would not happen ?
Because unless they remove Andrew’s there would be a massive outcry. The Royals don’t want to kick that hornets nest so they will just leave it alone. Plus the Fergie would need hers removed because she’s also brought the family into disrepute but she’s still kept hers.
It would just cause too big a headache for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Because unless they remove Andrew’s there would be a massive outcry. The Royals don’t want to kick that hornets nest so they will just leave it alone. Plus the Fergie would need hers removed because she’s also brought the family into disrepute but she’s still kept hers.
It would just cause too big a headache for them.
Fergie is the Duhess of York but she isn't HRH. She also didn't publicly announce her plan to become a private citizen or distance herself from the family.

Her daughters are also Princesses whereas Archie has no title. Meghan can't claim status as the mother of a titled royal. Harry (like Andrew) surely would always be a Prince by birthright and the sheer fact his father will be King, but as far as his use of HRH that could be perhaps subject to change, especially dependent on his actions given their decision to leave and their recent decisions leading to a conflict of interests and protocol?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
I remember, I'm confused too! 😵
I am not!

Because where does Ninaki Priddy fit in, if MM were older?

How comes not even ONE of all her former classmates, kindergarden buddies, college friends or collegues from No Deal ever claimed she was older?

There must be hundreds of persons who knew her in her nearly forty years on earth and most of them would despise her and/or have reason to tell on her and no one ever did!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Meghan's birthdate, school and University are too well documented to be fixed. She looks more like a well-preserved 45 year old than a Hollywood 39 though but that's sun, cigarettes and 'lifestyle' stuff.

Because unless they remove Andrew’s there would be a massive outcry. The Royals don’t want to kick that hornets nest so they will just leave it alone. Plus the Fergie would need hers removed because she’s also brought the family into disrepute but she’s still kept hers.
It would just cause too big a headache for them.
I still think Harry will decide to give up his Royal Dukedom voluntarily The RF certainly have a few things on file that they've hushed up over the years that could nudge him along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
I am not!

Because where does Ninaki Priddy fit in, if MM were older?

How comes not even ONE of all her former classmates, kindergarden buddies, college friends or collegues from No Deal ever claimed she was older?

There must be hundreds of persons who knew her in her nearly forty years on earth and most of them would despise her and/or have reason to tell on her and no one ever did!
Like you I'm surprised that more people haven't crawled out of the woodwork to say things about Smeggy (especially all the ones she has ghosted over the years). They can't all have been paid to keep quiet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
Meghan's birthdate, school and University are too well documented to be fixed. She looks more like a well-preserved 45 year old than a Hollywood 39 though but that's sun, cigarettes and 'lifestyle' stuff.



I still think Harry will decide to give up his Royal Dukedom voluntarily The RF certainly have a few things on file that they've hushed up over the years that could nudge him along.
İ agree that JH will be encouraged to give up the Dukedom/HRH voluntarily as they are now independent with a mortgage, NF contracts and all. The titles have served their purpose after all and perhaps they won't be that miffed to give them up now they will be billionaires. İ am sure MM will continue to use the title anyway. This lets the RF off the hook if it's not seen as their decision, and doesn't 'impact' other royals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
İ agree that JH will be encouraged to give up the Dukedom/HRH voluntarily as they are now independent with a mortgage, NF contracts and all. The titles have served their purpose after all and perhaps they won't be that miffed to give them up now they will be billionaires. İ am sure MM will continue to use the title anyway. This lets the RF off the hook if it's not seen as their decision, and doesn't 'impact' other royals.
Why would this be good?

She would be able to call herself Princess Harry and she would no doubt do so. And the American papers would call her Princess Meghan sooner or later.

Sounds worse to me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Why would this be good?

She would be able to call herself Princess Harry and she would no doubt do so. And the American papers would call her Princess Meghan sooner or later.

Sounds worse to me!
İf that's the case then perhaps that's why the titles will stay - Duchess being preferable to Princess (from our point of view). İmplications for royal titles though if Harry becomes a US citizen or political involvement deemed to be counter to British Royalty impartialıty. Surely in that scenario Princess would be disallowed, İ don't know......all this conjecture is mind-numbing - we need a strong Royal ruling on the situation.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.