Harry and Meghan #40 It's never our fault, our self awareness is locked in the vault!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts
Toto

Toto

softly softly said:
I have to say, in this case, if I'm reading correctly I think it's unfair to say that it's 'disgustingly shocking' and 'she's not right in the head' to be said about Meghan.
These Carol Services ,from what I have read, happen every year raising funds to raise funds in Uganda and in 2018 Meghan and she gave a reading If she herself chose the reading I do not know but I can't see what i wrong with that. There is nothing that I have seen she gave a speech , mentioned Diana at this event but please correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
I don't agree. Yes, the carol service does happen annually as the young man died just before Christmas. And the fundraising is to honour his intention to spend time working in Africa after completing his A levels and before going to university.

But in my opinion, it was crass for M to deliver a reading at a memorial service / celebration of a life, when she not only knew nothing about the young man who died or his family, but had only recently met and become engaged to one of the man's friends.

I can't begin to imagine why anyone in her position would feel comfortable with doing that. To me, it's the equivalent of her elbowing others out of the way so that she can be the one to shine (she thinks), when a more sensitive, mature and kind person would wish to be there simply to support her partner and be respectful to the memory of his late friend. To my mind she was grandstanding.

So..... Yes, I am shocked and disgusted. And I think that her behaviour on that occasion was at odds with what would generally be considered decent / kind / considerate / good manners / contd p94.

Aka not right in the head.

IMO.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 42
Palpatine

Palpatine

Baguette said:
Quick summary of Danja's YT video. She's heard (no sources so it's gossip) that Tyler is suing for back rent. The agreement was $150k per month plus extra for top-up security. They paid for the extra security but skipped out on the rent. Amazing if true or even partly true.
Click to expand...
I so hope this is true. In addition they have gone into competition with him as well. I seriously hope he blacklists them!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 23
M

Moronic

Sassy_nach said:
Has this been posted yet?
Meghan suing Splash News for paparazzi photos of her, Archie & dogs while walking in Vancouver Park earlier this year.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Meghan Markle sues picture agency over photos of her with son Archie

The Duchess of Sussex has taken a news and picture agency to the High Court over pictures of her and her son Archie in a Canadian park. None of the pictures showed the boy's face
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
This is a crystal clear example of how BATSHIT CRAZY she is. She was grinning from ear to ear! If you were horrified to the point of suing this would not be your facial expression! She’s an absolute psycho.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 24
Facehugger

Facehugger

Loftcat said:
So basically these two think they 're the dog's bollocks, when in fact Facehuggers dog's arse is more entertaining? Hmmm, bet Netflix are redoing the contract as we speak, cos we all know what we'd rather see!!
Click to expand...
That'll be £140 million please Netflix, and you can have exclusive rights. As long as the Tattlers get free subs & the dog gets paid in gravy bones 👍 thank you very much 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 20
Norbs

Norbs

Moronic said:
This is a crystal clear example of how BATSHIT CRAZY she is. She was grinning from ear to ear! If you were horrified to the point of suing this would not be your facial expression! She’s an absolute psycho.
Click to expand...
Staring straight down the lens and making love to the camera. She was well aware she was being photographed, and happily complicit.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 24
Angeoudemon

Angeoudemon

Some movie titles:

Free Harry
Frogmore redemption
The prince whisperer
How to train your prince
The LA mansion rules
Harry pothead and the chamber of secret tiaras
Breakfast at Soho house
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 19
Margo_Channing

Margo_Channing

  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 24
Facehugger

Facehugger

Angeoudemon said:
Some movie titles:

Free Harry
Frogmore redemption
The prince whisperer
How to train your prince
The LA mansion rules
Harry pothead and the chamber of secret tiaras
Breakfast at Soho house
Click to expand...
Going by that wallpaper that we all had a good old giggle about yesterday, I reckon we need 'Breakfast at Titfanny's' 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 27
LadyMuck

LadyMuck

Jusa said:
I can't believe that the people in the street seemed to like and support them! Bloody idiots!
Click to expand...
I reckon that was heavily edited and that they had a few negative comments on them but decided not to show
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Facehugger

Facehugger

Norbs said:
Staring straight down the lens and making love to the camera. She was well aware she was being photographed, and happily complicit.
Click to expand...
Not to mention if, as reported, she was in a public place, then anybody in the whole wide world can take a bleedin picture of her! This is getting beyond ridiculous now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20
Palpatine

Palpatine

  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 25
Baguette

Baguette

The more you think about the Netflix deal, the stranger it gets. This announcement did zip to publicise any upcoming project. It's all about the amazing genius of the Harkles brilliant dealmaking talents and puffing up the deal size to $150 million So they haven't built any sort of brand for their production company, or started to build anticipation for the forthcoming **insert Woke-name here** blockbuster Megsplanation doc.

Not only that, they've put out publicity dissing Jeffrey Katzenberg (he flew in to beg them to sign to QuiBi 🥴 ) and by putting it about that their deal with Netflix is $150 million, they've put Netflix in an awkward place with all the many real, live deals they are currently negotiating. Way to go - bet Netflix are not happy at these antics.

There's a great piece in the Telegraph which cannily suggests that Netflix will probably buy in a few documentaries and tell the Harkles to sit on a sofa and introduce them. Would be hilarious if they buy up the old Ardent TV stuff, much of which wasn't too bad. How long though before Harry becomes the face of the Netflix Royal documentaries? Or they twist his arm to allow them to make the next series of the Crown (the rumour from Page Six is it was Harry that blocked it)

If you have a few minutes, read the Telegraph piece (archived for easy reading which many thanks 😘 )for a really good explanation of how this Netflix deal will likely work, then read well-connected Cindy Adams in PageSix


pagesix.com

Timothy Cardinal Dolan to give opening prayer at Trump convention

Until Day 1 of their current hoo-hah the Democrats were still trying to dredge up a retired priest.
pagesix.com pagesix.com

Final thought. They aren't saving Archie for a magazine cover, are they? It's Royal TellyTubbies time..
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 19
Facehugger

Facehugger

Palpatine said:
I really really hate it when I have to agree with anything bleeping Piers bleeping asshole bleeping gobshite bleeping Morgan, the bleep, has to say! 🤬
Click to expand...
He's missed a trick or two there methinks Palp. Sooo, this children's programming? Anybody got any ideas? The Banana Splits? Captain Pugwash?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
DandyTandy

DandyTandy

Facehugger said:
He's missed a trick or two there methinks Palp. Sooo, this children's programming? Anybody got any ideas? The Banana Splits? Captain Pugwash?
Click to expand...

children's programming: more glorified reading to the child that has ZERO interest in what she has to say. if her own child doesn't even listen to her, why should we? :ROFLMAO: maybe that's how she's FINALLY going to cash him in since no one wants to pay for him.

i personally think that the child is going to grow up just like her, with her thoughts and propagandas. apple doesn't fall far from the tree. I wouldn't be surprised if the child grows up thinking "mommy said i can't go out because i'm too famous. time is money".

This children's programming is more brainwashing other children into liking her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.