I've had a good old nosey at all the DM comments on their articles today while I was bored, my goodness, the amount of people saying they've cancelled their Netflix is unbelievable. Don't blame them, I don't have it, but if I did I'd be getting rid too!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Latest Lady C and Misha with some discussion of H & M:-
So..the usual PR bullshit..they are bloody desperate I know that for a fact.
What content could they put out of value? or interest to anyone but themselves...
He is too thick to know where his balls have gone....just saying...
Message from @Momof5intheStates
She's missing her husband and son, and missing us. The kids say she's 'witchy ' and are sending her to the naughty 'couch '
where she's feeling lonely. She sends @freda19 this image although I pointed out that Freda has already spotted two!
There are lots of images of the devastation wreaked by the storm over on FB; looks terrible.
She's missing her husband and son, and missing us. The kids say she's 'witchy ' and are sending her to the naughty 'couch '
where she's feeling lonely. She sends @freda19 this image although I pointed out that Freda has already spotted two!There are lots of images of the devastation wreaked by the storm over on FB; looks terrible.
Attachments
Just cancelled Netflix. Put in the why box...”disgusted with Sussex sign up”
Did you set the photocopier to x2?
He's fine when he's getting paid for those camera clicks/flashes
Oh now, that's unfair...... we are all stupid, and need them to show us how to be better people don't yaknow. Like how to write on bananas, plant seeds, put bags in cars for 10 minutes, master the art of twattishness and how to ghost folk in the blink of an eyelid. Even their own family! All that nicey nicey positivity bollocks that they do, you get my drift.
With a plastic fake doll as a child and abandoned rescue dog in canada..thanks for reminding me..I forgot how shallow there are! lol xOh now, that's unfair...... we are all stupid, and need them to show us how to be better people don't yaknow. Like how to write on bananas, plant seeds, put bags in cars for 10 minutes, master the art of twattishness and how to ghost folk in the blink of an eyelid. Even their own family! All that nicey nicey positivity bollocks that they do, you get my drift.
Yep dollar signs
Dollar signs cancel out camera flashes...who knew...answers on a postage stamp with the face of HM the Q and not Meghan the Melgomaniac. Millions of Uk GB pounds count for nothing..they are a total disgrace..spending hard earned tax payers money in a global pandemic on a huge mansion..I have no idea why the world is not speaking out about their hypocracy and self entitlement.He's fine when he's getting paid for those camera clicks/flashes
Last edited:
Absolutely spot on. Do as I say, not as I do, the law is now their word salad spew. Him apparently being triggered by cameras is the biggest load of BS ever, like you and others have said, he's perfectly fine when there's a dollar or two involved. The doublest of epic standards that is.
A bit like the phoney engagement photocall..when she said..she didnt know who he was...total bullshit..we are not wrong chick..we can spot a bullshitter a mile away.
They sent Katie 'mouthpiece' Nicholl out onto BBC Breakfast to say that sources had suggested the deal was north of £100 million. The Telegraph have been told the Harkles were shopping the same deal to NBC, Apple and HBO for around the $100 million mark.
They have zero track record and have trashed their relationship with the UK public and the Royal Family. Just can't see any of these figures being plausible.
What's great is that the RF can tell them to get ex-royally stuffed now and get rid of the Hartrashians.
Megz team were in court for the Baby Carrier pictures case.
www.standard.co.uk
Setting out the basis of the claim, barrister Jonathan Barnes, representing Meghan and her son, told the hearing she denies suggestions that she agreed to the images being taken or “acquiesced” when she spotted Splash photographer Steve Dennett.
“They were papped in this location," he said. “The photographs which are the first stage of the wrongful conduct we complain about took place in Vancouver.”
He said the Duchess argues they were on a “private recreational route” on Vancouver Island, close to the £10m mansion where they were staying.
And the story continues...
At today’s hearing, where details of the legal action emerged for the first time, a judge ruled the Duchess’ lawyers could serve court papers on the LA-based operation of Splash News.
The court heard the British arm of the agency has gone into administration during the pandemic, but Mr Barnes argued successfully that the American part of the agency could properly be sued in the English courts.
The photo agency was not represented today, but Mr Barnes said several points of a possible defence had already been raised by its solicitors in a letter sent in February.
He said it was suggested the Duchess and her son had “no reasonable expectation of privacy”, they may have agreed to the photos being taken, and the images were “in the public interest and public debate was being assisted by use of the photographs”.
They have zero track record and have trashed their relationship with the UK public and the Royal Family. Just can't see any of these figures being plausible.
What's great is that the RF can tell them to get ex-royally stuffed now and get rid of the Hartrashians.
Megz team were in court for the Baby Carrier pictures case.
Meghan sues paparazzi picture agency over Vancouver 'privacy breach'
The Duchess of Sussex is suing a picture agency over claims her privacy was breached when she was “papped” on a walk with son Archie and her dogs.
Setting out the basis of the claim, barrister Jonathan Barnes, representing Meghan and her son, told the hearing she denies suggestions that she agreed to the images being taken or “acquiesced” when she spotted Splash photographer Steve Dennett.
“They were papped in this location," he said. “The photographs which are the first stage of the wrongful conduct we complain about took place in Vancouver.”
He said the Duchess argues they were on a “private recreational route” on Vancouver Island, close to the £10m mansion where they were staying.
And the story continues...
At today’s hearing, where details of the legal action emerged for the first time, a judge ruled the Duchess’ lawyers could serve court papers on the LA-based operation of Splash News.
The court heard the British arm of the agency has gone into administration during the pandemic, but Mr Barnes argued successfully that the American part of the agency could properly be sued in the English courts.
The photo agency was not represented today, but Mr Barnes said several points of a possible defence had already been raised by its solicitors in a letter sent in February.
He said it was suggested the Duchess and her son had “no reasonable expectation of privacy”, they may have agreed to the photos being taken, and the images were “in the public interest and public debate was being assisted by use of the photographs”.
Scenario for first production:
Harry answers phone
to HMQ
"So proud of you for this Twatfix deal! Millions of pounds one believes?"
H: " yes, gangan, could be billions"
Q: "Marvellous! You won't need us then! Well done! Funding is cancelled "
H: "Well, I mean...er.....er....
Q: Toodle pip, and Freda sends her regards, by the way, you really are what she says!
Dial tone.
Harry answers phone
to HMQ"So proud of you for this Twatfix deal! Millions of pounds one believes?"
H: " yes, gangan, could be billions"
Q: "Marvellous! You won't need us then! Well done! Funding is cancelled "
H: "Well, I mean...er.....er....
Q: Toodle pip, and Freda sends her regards, by the way, you really are what she says!
Dial tone.
Ha Ha Ha...and Harry Haa Ha again...checkmate..the Q.Scenario for first production:
Harry answers phone
"So proud of you for this Twatfix deal! Millions of pounds one believes?"
H: " yes, gangan, could be billions"
Q: "Marvellous! You won't need us then! Well done! Funding is cancelled "
H: "Well, I mean...er.....er....
Q: Toodle pip, and Freda sends her regards, by the way, you really are what she says!
Dial tone.
Quick summary of Danja's YT video. She's heard (no sources so it's gossip) that Tyler is suing for back rent. The agreement was $150k per month plus extra for top-up security. They paid for the extra security but skipped out on the rent. Amazing if true or even partly true.Brand would certainly be an excellent choice to play Manson in a film
Wow if they haven't paid their rent to Tyler Perry that's a big mistake. Especially after they trashed his taste in decor in Finding Freebies
That won't make them any friends in Hollywood, they'll just be known as scroungers.
I bet they never paid a penny...just my thought. so were evicted.
Bit like when the fake moon bump came off when she squatted down in stilletoes..whilst allegedly pregnant..they think we came down in the last shower of rain.
- Status