Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

LadyMuck

VIP Member
Loose Women pro H&M today. Denise, Judy,, Kelle all bigging them up as in 'theyve done everything they said they'd do, have repaid etc'....blah blah
 
  • Sick
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 16

Flipping Hell !

Chatty Member
I too pray just William and Harry are at the unveiling of Dianas statue

Does anyone else follow the Harry and Meghan thread on Kiwi Farms? Just catching up on it after a couple of weeks (it's a fairly...robust discussion forum) and saw this interesting snippet of gossip from H&M's wedding.

View attachment 230728

(There's also a downloadable .epub of Finding Freedom on that thread, but if anyone goes for it, I'd run it through several virus checkers).
I wouldn't be shocked if someone said that about her, but I cannot for one minute think it would be Kate using that word in public
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 16

Flipping Hell !

Chatty Member
Now I'm at the ripe old age of "knowing better" (ha) I often recall my great gran's words of wisdom (loved a bible quote she did)

"But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret."

Had to look it up as, was more of a Jackie girl meself back then but it was from Matthew 6:3. They want to put the Farrow n Ball colour charts down and start learning how to behave like decent people.

Also, from the comments :mad:

Welldam, Los Angeles, United States, 47 minutes ago

I highly doubt the parents of these children were asked to sign image releases for their children. I used to work in TV production and it's an essential part of filming. You can't just roll into a school and start taking photos of kids and sending them out to the international press. There have been MANY instances when the Markles have used children to promote themselves and I always wonder if the parents gave consent. The biggest one was the children at the cancer ward who were asked to pose with Meghan's discarded baby shower flowers.
Yet again the "S" word ,once again they "Surprise " the public, while dragging a full camera crew along with them

I like that, here's a creepy video to go with it.....
100% Schizo
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 16

Baguette

VIP Member
Forgive the intrusion..long-standing lurking fan and unforgivably illiterate technology user, but as I was lurking on twitter a strange looking code came across and I grabbed a few screen shots. If I posted a few, could you knowledgeable people tell me if it’s fluff or should be passed along? Some of it looked rather strange and all of it appears generated by the evil dweller in Cali. View attachment 233955

It was a running script with an embedded option to plant on a website. Odd? Yes. Or is this a common thing? I’m am not familiar with technology
Weird stuff isn't it? Looks like it's been generated by a bot farm using common royal search terms.
I'd report it on Twitter as there seem to be death threats in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16

Baguette

VIP Member
Loose Women pro H&M today. Denise, Judy,, Kelle all bigging them up as in 'theyve done everything they said they'd do, have repaid etc'....blah blah
Harkles PR has been busy if that's the line they are taking! 🥴

Newsweek has got the Sussex clap-back on Invictus ETA It's a doozy and I've bolded on the particularly funny bits.



Prince Harry has threatened legal action over claims a fundraiser for the Invictus Games was canceled due to the Netflix mega-deal he signed with wife Meghan Markle.

The Duke of Sussex, 35, launched the Olympics-style tournament for injured veterans and is quoted on its website saying it shows "the very best of the human spirit."

However, reports over the weekend suggested a fundraiser event due to be streamed by Amazon was canceled due to a conflict of interest with Harry and Meghan's new Netflix contract.

They signed a landmark deal estimated at between $50 to $100 million to make shows over multiple years.

The concert was once planned for the Hollywood Bowl, in Los Angeles, around the time of the 2021 Invictus games next year. There were discussions about asking Ed Sheeran and Beyonce to perform.

A source close to the couple vehemently denied the story, saying the move was due to the impact of the coronavirus.

The Sunday Times has now added a note to its original story confirming it has received a legal complaint over its article, which remains online.

Newsweek has been told a letter before action was sent to the newspaper because the criticism struck at a cause close to Harry's heart.

A Sussex source told Newsweek: "This is about the suggestion that the duke was not fully committed to the Invictus Games, which is untrue and was obviously upsetting to the duke."

The source added: "The Netflix stuff has absolutely zero to do with the Invictus plan, there's absolutely no connection whatsoever.

"In terms of the plan for some form of Amazon-backed concert, which was part of the proposal, there are lots of reasons why that's not going ahead.

"One of the main ones being the proposal was for a live major concert at the Hollywood Bowl.

"There were lots of problems with it and everyone went away and it was decided they were not going to push forward with it and therefore there were other ways to look at other fundraising opportunities for Invictus."

The newspaper claimed a lawyer acting for Harry had canceled the event citing a "conflict" over a planned deal with a rival streaming service.

Plans for the concert, negotiated by Spun Gold, were in their infancy with the venue unable to give guarantees about whether it would be open due to coronavirus.

Sheeran and Beyonce had not yet been booked and the project was still in the development stage.

However, Newsweek has been told Prince Harry is still open to working with Amazon in the future should a different project be possible.

A source said: "Amazon has an amazing veterans employment program and support program in the U.S.

"They are keen to try and support Invictus in some way. That does not mean at this stage that there is going to be a concert in the Hollywood Bowl in the spring which sells tickets and all the rest of it.

"Will that materialize into some other form of support? There's a possibility. We will constantly continue those lines of conversation. But as it currently stands it is not going ahead."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16

Margot1977

VIP Member
What the heck is DC, please? :unsure: Darling what Freda says??? Because if it is, I'd love it. If it isn't it should be :)
Sadly not! 😂😂😂 it's a more mundane Darling Husband, Darling Child, Darling Daughter, Darling Son etc...(and I only went on Mumsnet a handful of times years ago, it puzzled me to begin with too...it was a weird place).
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16

Facehugger

VIP Member
That would be bloody brilliant. And since the original Apprentice series were in the US and featured Trump as the boss, would sell in the US as well.

They could have Doris in the Margaret/Karren female advisor role and Omit Scoobies in the Nick/Claude male advisor role.

They already have the glamorous Massive House for the teams to stay in.

Tasks need not necessarily include Archiedoll, but some should:
  • Look after Archiedoll for a day while making sure he gets papped but without getting found out for blatantly booking the paps in
  • Make a TV advert to try to get viewers for their latest wokeumentary Megflix show
  • Come up with and market a new flavour of tea to throw at the staff
  • Organise a tourist bus tour of Greater Los Angeles, pointing out the houses of the rich and famous who are still Smeghan's friends
  • Work in a Private Jet agency, the team that sells the most flights to Extinction Rebellion members wins the week
  • Sell avocado burgers and banana rock with inspirational quotes written all the way up the centre, to the punters in Disneyland California
  • 10 item shopping spree around Beverley Hills, with all the items on the shopping list being tat from Misha Nonoo and Victoria Beckham's shops. Excellent merching opportunities from this episode!
  • Gatecrash some other charity's event then claim it as your own (being sure to get lots of photos)
  • Design and market a calendar of every other UK royal event or birthday, worth trying to overshadow
  • Persuade celebrities to lend you their Massive Houses, but then don't actually pay them
  • For the finale episode, try to blag a ticket to the Oscars by any means possible!
At the end of the episode instead of Sugar saying "You're Fired!" it would be Ginge and Cringe sniggering, pointing, and saying "You're Markled!".
That is pure class, brilliant! 👏👏👏👏 I'd imagined Supernanny Jo Frost peering over her glasses in Karen's role judging any Archibald tasks, can you fit her in? 🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16

Facehugger

VIP Member
Funny how Samantha markle, gobshite to the press at ANY opportunity , has been totally silent for months!!!!! Been handsomely paid to shut up by manky megs???!!!!! Thoughts tattle bastards???
Someone on the last thread (can't remember who, sorry) suggested she might have gone quiet until the legal case around the letter to her Dad is finished with?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16

Palpatine

VIP Member
I wish I could quote reply. But anyway...
Re: Scotch Mist.

😂😂😂 @ haznoballs. That's a good name for him so it shall be used!

Right, so where is the money coming from to sustain their lifestyle? Bank of Charles? I know Haznoballs has a trust fund but 30 million won't last long in Montecito.

Okay, no problem - I thought if anyone wanted to read it they could get it free rather than line Scobie's pockets. And, as for him reading stuff, I really do think he does. I also think there are PR people on the case, I've seen them trying to shut down threads on another site. I quoted one of his posts as a test, without using the @ or a hashtag and within a couple of minutes one delightful fan of the duo left me a rude comment, they seem to be monitoring everything.
Bring them on. Cunts :devilish:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16

Pixie06

VIP Member
I’m a couple of pages behind atm, but saw this on Twitter & thought I’d share, the look on her face is not what I’d consider the look of love!






I seem to remember reading some where that it’s the other way round, she can take HRH etc hence Andy losing his, but the duke etc has to be removed by parliament. It was probably either the LCC book, or some rabbit hole I fell down
So what are the thoughts on the fact they were married before Windsor, as they didn't use their legal names in the service, Henry and Rachel, but Harry and Meghan?

Edited to say, I was reading the tweets/comments on the post!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16

Campagne

VIP Member
Ooh Ive found another person who thinks there was some scenario between Smeg and Charles:

'There is NO question MM has something extremely, very strong on the Royal family, and FOLLOW THE MONEY, what she has to blackmail them mightily is DIRECTLY INVOLVING BETWEEN HER & PRINCE CHARLES. IT most likely is some sexual interaction that she either recorded audio and or visual. Small H is livid over what his father had with MM that is why he has insulted the family and has nothing to do with all of them except through MM. Small H is only a little afraid of the QUEEN herself but MM constantly assures him she knows how to manipulate everything. MM believes she will continue to receive anything she wants from the monarchy. She has them in the palm of her hand & she absolutely knows it. That's why her demands & behaviors continue to be more & more outrageous. There will be no stopping her. You'll see...'😳😳🤯
i do wonder what hold she has over Charles.
This was her last appearance when she was giving her shit eating grin and curtseyed to Charles.
What the hell can be said about him after « I want to be a tampon and live in your trousers » 30 years ago.
it’s utterly weird that the RF put up with their shit.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16

Pixie06

VIP Member
How much background do you think the Royal family had on Megz at the beginning? Are the Royal's trying to distance themselves from them as they can't have another scandal!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15

freda19

VIP Member
Here's some info about R Gerald Markle - I'm not sure what relation he is to meghan though:
Yes I found that one. It wouldn't surprise me if she looked up the details of a conveniently deceased lawyer with the name Markle and added herself into their company in order to assist Doris in getting the house into her name. This is pure speculation obviously but it's like history repeating itself the way the Ragland women have big houses serendipitously fall into their laps.
Also I also fould it odd how she retained her dad's name despite the rancour between them. If she admires mommy so much then why not use her precious name? Or maybe the Ragland name search would revert to the whole 'grandpa Ragland tripped over a dog lead and had numerous head injuries' scenario, so staying Markle was a way of distancing herself just a tad. Plus Pansky Markle was a very respected firm should anyone check the name.

It says her age is 37 in that, she's now 39...she's been with Harry 4 years...
I know ! Lying about her age? Say it ain't so. :eek:

Though maybe she added a few years back then to endow herself with some sort of age related gravitas for the position she was claiming.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 15