Oh man I didn’t see it
Surely there will have been lots of lawyers involved whether Harry liked it or not (before their wedding) so I assume there’s a limit to what she can have?
Oh man I didn’t see itI saw it.....100% her.
Surely there will have been lots of lawyers involved whether Harry liked it or not (before their wedding) so I assume there’s a limit to what she can have?I think she will get the money and then leave.
Honestly hate the Daily Fail for click bait headlines like this. It's a split second snapshot it doesnt show anythingOh dear!
The Royals don't do pre nups, but all she could go for would be what's actually in Harry's bank account. No claim on future income, as that comes from his father. No claim on Frogmore, that belongs to the crown.Oh man I didn’t see it
Surely there will have been lots of lawyers involved whether Harry liked it or not (before their wedding) so I assume there’s a limit to what she can have?
That home wasn’t hers, she rented it (https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7886753/million-home-meghan-markle-toronto-princess/)They sued for a few stories run on them - that got most of the headlines but the breakdown of what they sued for included old stuff. All apparently in a bid to stop the video getting out.
Do we think they're staying with friends or if they already own a property in Canada? Did Meghan sell her old home there...? Although I doubt they'd go back to her old house anyway
They were allegedly with her when she helped the poor struggling people with their selfie. So I assume she left them behind in Canada this week just like she did with Archie.Wonder where their dogs are during all this.
Rented would make sense!That home wasn’t hers, she rented it (https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7886753/million-home-meghan-markle-toronto-princess/)
They were allegedly with her when she helped the poor struggling people with their selfie. So I assume she left them behind in Canada this week just like she did with Archie.
I think many of those words used to describe her suit Eamonn!Eamonn Holmes says he has no sympathy for Meghan
The 60-year-old called her 'awful, woke, weak, manipulative spoilt and irritating' and said he didn't think he would like her in real life, despite admitting he has never met her in person.www.dailymail.co.uk
Love that even Eamonn hates her
He didn’t mince his words!Eamonn Holmes says he has no sympathy for Meghan
The 60-year-old called her 'awful, woke, weak, manipulative spoilt and irritating' and said he didn't think he would like her in real life, despite admitting he has never met her in person.www.dailymail.co.uk
Love that even Eamonn hates her
I always remember him, as pretty much an opening gambit, saying to that Josie Cunningham horror "people hate you"He didn’t mince his words!
The Royals definitely do prenups...the law on prenups changed (ie to make them binding) just before William and Kate got engaged. Coincidence? Or did the RF learn from all the previous divorces....? Without a pre-nup, Meagain would be entitled to 50% of his assets, so you can bet that there is a pre-nup. However, his assets are chump change really (most of the RF's assets are Crown property which means they are really owned by the nation and just 'borrowed' by the Monarch. She is entitled to loan them out eg the estates, the property, the jewellery - but when the papers say she's 'given' that doesn't mean here's a gift, it's yours outright, it just means she has given permission for them to use it on a long term basis eg Frogmore - it's Crown property which is why the taxpayer paid for it to be refurbished and not the Queen out of her private income).The Royals don't do pre nups, but all she could go for would be what's actually in Harry's bank account.
The Royals definitely do prenups...the law on prenups changed (ie to make them binding) just before William and Kate got engaged. Coincidence? Or did the RF learn from all the previous divorces....? Without a pre-nup, Meagain would be entitled to 50% of his assets, so you can bet that there is a pre-nup. However, his assets are chump change really (most of the RF's assets are Crown property which means they are really owned by the nation and just 'borrowed' by the Monarch. She is entitled to loan them out eg the estates, the property, the jewellery - but when the papers say she's 'given' that doesn't mean here's a gift, it's yours outright, it just means she has given permission for them to use it on a long term basis eg Frogmore - it's Crown property which is why the taxpayer paid for it to be refurbished and not the Queen out of her private income).
50% of Harry's personal assets wouldn't keep Meagain in private jets for a year. I guess that's why the 'half and half' situation that she's come up with works so well (she thinks) - she gets to borrow all the Crown property and strut around calling herself a princess (FFS) even as the revolting pair are flogging hoodies and doing Primark hauls (#activist) to top up their own bank accounts. And then when the marriage fails, she stays in the US where she has already established herself as People's Queen, superstar actress and all-round amaaaaaaaazing human being, whilst he comes back home to the UK.
If she divorces him, she gets very little, so she's got to keep him sweet - and isolated from his family so he's too proud to admit he made a big mistake.
You don't want to see it. It was anal sex.Oh man I didn’t see it
Surely there will have been lots of lawyers involved whether Harry liked it or not (before their wedding) so I assume there’s a limit to what she can have?
Haha excellentYou don't want to see it. It was anal sex.
He's a ponce. I was at a show in London and he was sat behind us. Before the show started, he made sure to stand up and be very expressive hoping people would know who he was. So obnoxious.I think many of those words used to describe her suit Eamonn!
ETA - apparently Harry is still in London
Perhaps that's how she keeps Harry....You don't want to see it. It was anal sex.
So does that mean she was still a virgin when they got marriedYou don't want to see it. It was anal sex.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?