What age are you? 12?
DUH!You were supposed to piss on his face like any decent yacht girl would, then charge it to his credit card.
Honestly, do we have to explain every nuance of "How to get a Man and Keep him".
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
DUH!You were supposed to piss on his face like any decent yacht girl would, then charge it to his credit card.
Honestly, do we have to explain every nuance of "How to get a Man and Keep him".
First time poster here - I love you guys. Irish in Australia and literally live to read this daily. Sorry if this was posted before but I think this is appropriate today, it's my all time fav - I even think they should redo a new version (hope I posted it right)...
There are so many things that duck me right off about these two. Why on earth would they be biting the hand that feeds them while on probation?! Also, I’m not a staunch royalist. I agree that the monarchy should be slimmed down, and they shouldn’t receive any public funds considering how much personal wealth they sit on. I also think funds from the duchies should be better allocated to help people. But I quite enjoy the history and ceremony that accompanies them and have a soft spot for HMQ. A little less now though after she started sheltering that arrogant fuckwit son of hers. There’s a reason why the British monarchy is still standing after over 1000 years. Bloody laughable that a failing cable tv actress without any discernible talent or beauty things she can bring it to its knees. I’d add something about her being on her knees but it’s too hot and they piss me off too much. I hope they lose their titles, H divorces M and Archie is set up with some ££ and an open door to his UK family to ensure he has a good future. As for W & K I don’t care if they’re boring. Like that’s a valid criticism for the future monarch and his wife? 
history has shown us what happens when royals live lives are that too exciting and it doesn’t end well. Nor will it for the Sussexes 
history has shown us what happens when royals live lives are that too exciting and it doesn’t end well. Nor will it for the Sussexes 
Confirmation in the book that Harry's oldest friend Tom Inskip wasn't invited to the evening party. The 'fun' speeches happened at the evening bash, not the formal lunchtime reception, and were delivered by William and Charlie von Straubenzee.
Two hundred friends and family, who had received the hand-drawn invitations for the evening reception, arrived at Frogmore House close to 7:00 p.m. in double-decker buses. Some chose to take their own transportation, including Doria, who napped in the back of a Range Rover. Harry’s cousins Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie skipped the more pedestrian rides in favor of a black Bentley. George and Amal Clooney pulled up in a silver Audi. (Notably absent were Skippy, Harry’s old friend, who had questioned the prince’s relationship with Meghan, and his wife, Lara. They were invited to the wedding ceremony and lunchtime reception but didn’t make the cut for the evening bash. At a brunch the day after the wedding, Skippy told friends, “Meghan had changed Harry too much.” His Eton pal said the prince was awed by the likes of the Clooneys and Oprah. “We’ve lost him,” Skippy concluded. Many of Harry’s old friends said that the evening guest list was the prince and his bride’s way of saying, “These are the people we want in our lives moving forward.”
And of course Megz had to give a wedding word salad..
The bride took her moment at the mic to express her appreciation to the Queen for warmly welcoming her into the fold from the start. Charles got his own thank-you for stepping in to fill the role of her father in escorting her down the aisle and for his courtesy in helping her mother through unfamiliar territory. Doria, too, was thanked for her support and wisdom. The bulk of her praise, though, went to Harry, the prince she had been fixed up with by chance and who continued to shatter her every expectation. All her American pals whistled and clapped.
Fixed up with by chance? Not according to Chapter 2. And there's no mention of the reaction of the Brits, though. zzzzzzz **reaches for gin**
Two hundred friends and family, who had received the hand-drawn invitations for the evening reception, arrived at Frogmore House close to 7:00 p.m. in double-decker buses. Some chose to take their own transportation, including Doria, who napped in the back of a Range Rover. Harry’s cousins Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie skipped the more pedestrian rides in favor of a black Bentley. George and Amal Clooney pulled up in a silver Audi. (Notably absent were Skippy, Harry’s old friend, who had questioned the prince’s relationship with Meghan, and his wife, Lara. They were invited to the wedding ceremony and lunchtime reception but didn’t make the cut for the evening bash. At a brunch the day after the wedding, Skippy told friends, “Meghan had changed Harry too much.” His Eton pal said the prince was awed by the likes of the Clooneys and Oprah. “We’ve lost him,” Skippy concluded. Many of Harry’s old friends said that the evening guest list was the prince and his bride’s way of saying, “These are the people we want in our lives moving forward.”
And of course Megz had to give a wedding word salad..
The bride took her moment at the mic to express her appreciation to the Queen for warmly welcoming her into the fold from the start. Charles got his own thank-you for stepping in to fill the role of her father in escorting her down the aisle and for his courtesy in helping her mother through unfamiliar territory. Doria, too, was thanked for her support and wisdom. The bulk of her praise, though, went to Harry, the prince she had been fixed up with by chance and who continued to shatter her every expectation. All her American pals whistled and clapped.
Fixed up with by chance? Not according to Chapter 2. And there's no mention of the reaction of the Brits, though. zzzzzzz **reaches for gin**
Non disclosure signed or not, if I were one of the Nannie's that left under extenuating circumstances and they were lying about me in this book I'd be clearing it up PDQ. I look forward to the day when they eventually step forward and tell the truth.
When this marriage breaks down, do the non disclosures still hold?
The more I read about this couple the more I realize how Harry is enabling her to behave very very badly ...
Edited to add, they both enable each other. he's a every bit as much of a cretin as she is ...
When this marriage breaks down, do the non disclosures still hold?
The more I read about this couple the more I realize how Harry is enabling her to behave very very badly ...
Edited to add, they both enable each other. he's a every bit as much of a cretin as she is ...
Sorry but Harry is a bleep if he chose or even allowed Skippy and others to be invited to the church but not the reception, if i was them i wouldn’t have even shown up to the church.
I am assuming Harrys close friends invited him to all parts of their weddings, he was acting crappy and sending them a message about where they now stood and they should of done the same back by taking a stand and not attending the whole pathetic circus.
I am assuming Harrys close friends invited him to all parts of their weddings, he was acting crappy and sending them a message about where they now stood and they should of done the same back by taking a stand and not attending the whole pathetic circus.
I agree.
The nanny would no doubt have signed an NDA. However, if they are spreading falsehoods about her, does she have the right to sue? Although she’s not been named, her friends and family will know who she is so is this classed as defamation?
Perhaps Aunty could comment please?
Baguette, hope you are well and not ODing on sugar and word salad!
Sorry you're right. I just felt really angry when I read some of that tit they have allowed to be released.
Ohhhhhh how funny it would be if someone from Suits came out to state what utter horse dung this is!Meghan led prayer circles, while filming Suits. Uh huh. Actors are even more hierarchical than the Royal Family, yet more revisionist
This book is a dreadful thing - so many obvious lies it's really unpleasant if you know the background.
It's long been said that the Harkles had broken up before the Inskip wedding, but guess what brought them back together? Poor Megz was photographed by the eViL PaParaZzi yet again. What a coincidence!
On the first day, gloriously sunny skies and turquoise waters put all the wedding guests in a celebratory mood. The festivities went far into the night as old friends stayed up late, tossing back cocktails and exchanging memories. But just twenty-four hours in, the trip soured for Harry and Meghan. Protection officers accompanying the pair to Jamaica discovered a photographer from a Los Angeles–based celebrity photo agency on the grounds. They were promptly tossed out of the resort, but not before capturing the couple in a steamy embrace on their private balcony and Meghan in her tiny swimsuits frolicking in the water with the prince. While Meghan was horrified by the intrusion, Harry was apoplectic.
During a heated call to the palace, he laid out his instructions in no uncertain terms. These photos were not to see the lightof day. “Do whatever needs to be done,” the prince said. His communications secretary assured Harry that the situation was being taken care of. Subsequent calls to the company, using such language as “outrageous violation of privacy,” ensured that the revealing balcony photos were never offered up for purchase and didn’t turn up anywhere, even in the darkest corners of the Internet (they still have never seen the light of day). But the agency still planned to sell pictures of the couple in the water, including dozens of frames zoomed in on Meghan’s body.
In their villa bedroom, Harry was angry and shouting while Meghan was concerned. She more than understood his feelings about media intrusion, how that deep distrust had formed after his mother’s death and had never gone away, bubbling up each time a reporter took their efforts to get a story too far.
It's long been said that the Harkles had broken up before the Inskip wedding, but guess what brought them back together? Poor Megz was photographed by the eViL PaParaZzi yet again. What a coincidence!
On the first day, gloriously sunny skies and turquoise waters put all the wedding guests in a celebratory mood. The festivities went far into the night as old friends stayed up late, tossing back cocktails and exchanging memories. But just twenty-four hours in, the trip soured for Harry and Meghan. Protection officers accompanying the pair to Jamaica discovered a photographer from a Los Angeles–based celebrity photo agency on the grounds. They were promptly tossed out of the resort, but not before capturing the couple in a steamy embrace on their private balcony and Meghan in her tiny swimsuits frolicking in the water with the prince. While Meghan was horrified by the intrusion, Harry was apoplectic.
During a heated call to the palace, he laid out his instructions in no uncertain terms. These photos were not to see the lightof day. “Do whatever needs to be done,” the prince said. His communications secretary assured Harry that the situation was being taken care of. Subsequent calls to the company, using such language as “outrageous violation of privacy,” ensured that the revealing balcony photos were never offered up for purchase and didn’t turn up anywhere, even in the darkest corners of the Internet (they still have never seen the light of day). But the agency still planned to sell pictures of the couple in the water, including dozens of frames zoomed in on Meghan’s body.
In their villa bedroom, Harry was angry and shouting while Meghan was concerned. She more than understood his feelings about media intrusion, how that deep distrust had formed after his mother’s death and had never gone away, bubbling up each time a reporter took their efforts to get a story too far.
I can't believe that Harry treated his old friend Skippy so badly. It's a real insult not inviting him to the evening celebrations. He must have been really hurt by that. His old school friend not more important than celebs he doesn't even know. 
Disgusting.
If my best friend had done that to me I don't think that I would've turned up at all.
Disgusting. If my best friend had done that to me I don't think that I would've turned up at all.
Meghan felt she was 'expected to serve Archie on a silver platter'
The Duchess of Sussex felt she was expected to 'serve Archie on a silver platter' by the same people who had 'been abusing her', new biography Finding Freedom claims.
Speaking in the book, which was released today, an insider claimed Meghan said: 'The same people who have been abusing me want to see me serve my child on a silver platter.
'A child who is not going to be protected and doesn't have a title. How does that make sense? Tell that to any mother in the world.'
She's so full of nonsense and that makes it sound like they didn't choose to forgo a title for him but it was rather decided for them. Also in that article, she had the full on Royal christening for Archie, so all the pomp and circumstance whilst missing out the bits she didn't like so she could thumb her nose at us.
The article about Archdolls daily routine and classes he has been taking to me proves they have contributed to the book. Who the hell would know all those details??
Also about them being worried when Charles becomes King and him possibly giving Archie the title of a prince..... hmmm sure
Also about them being worried when Charles becomes King and him possibly giving Archie the title of a prince..... hmmm sure
My big take-away is that this entire nasty book is designed to justify Madam Duchess's claims for spousal maintenance after divorce, by documenting their current lifestyle in very considerable detail.
There's a big and unusal emphasis on how unsuitable Nottingham Cottage was for the Harkles (despite being OK for Prince Harry for years) so they rented the big farmhouse in Great Tew, near Soho House, for six months or so. Big emphasis placed on Doria having 'her own room and bathroom'there...
While the area was safe and protected, “being out in the middle of the countryside, where you don’t know who is out there at night or if someone has managed to sneak nearby” was enough for them to say goodbye to Oxfordshire. The original plan was to keep the house until the end of the lease and then potentially buy it. But they moved back to Nottingham Cottage, which felt even more cramped and uncomfortable, until Frogmore was ready.
ETA.. They seemed to have expected both Frogmore and a London base! Greedy pair!
Because of this connection to their work, Harry and Meghan planned to retain a London base in the future. They no longer used Nott Cott, which remained unoccupied after they vacated it. There was ample precedent for the Sussexes to maintain two residences. William and Kate were gifted Anmer Hall on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk by the Queen, but their primary residence was Apartment 1A at Kensington Palace. Prince Charles retained Clarence House as his official residence and Highgrove in Gloucestershire for weekends in the country. Similarly, Princess Anne retained a private Buckingham Palace apartment—as does Prince Andrew. For the moment, though, the couple was firmly established in Frogmore,
There's information about their wedding photographer being hacked, which is new, I think.
In addition to the physical precautions at Frogmore, Harry and Meghan also began taking extra safety measures with digital information after they suffered a major data leak. On September 12, 2018, a computer programmer based in Russia managed to hack into an online cloud storage
account that contained over two hundred unseen photos of Harry and Meghan that had been taken by the photographer Alexi Lubomirski.
Among the stolen images were pictures of the couple sharing personal moments during their engagement photo series as well as others from their wedding day reception (including some of the Queen). The large set also included outtakes with eyes half closed and other unflattering moments meant for the trash can. The hacker leaked a handful of the photos to Tumblr. Many fans assumed they were fake, photoshopped images, but behind the scenes there was concern at Kensington Palace when they received a tip about the security breach. Harry and Meghan “were alarmed to hear that it was so easy to get such personal files of theirs,” a source close to the couple said. “The whole situation was a wake-up call.”
There's a big and unusal emphasis on how unsuitable Nottingham Cottage was for the Harkles (despite being OK for Prince Harry for years) so they rented the big farmhouse in Great Tew, near Soho House, for six months or so. Big emphasis placed on Doria having 'her own room and bathroom'there...
While the area was safe and protected, “being out in the middle of the countryside, where you don’t know who is out there at night or if someone has managed to sneak nearby” was enough for them to say goodbye to Oxfordshire. The original plan was to keep the house until the end of the lease and then potentially buy it. But they moved back to Nottingham Cottage, which felt even more cramped and uncomfortable, until Frogmore was ready.
ETA.. They seemed to have expected both Frogmore and a London base! Greedy pair!
Because of this connection to their work, Harry and Meghan planned to retain a London base in the future. They no longer used Nott Cott, which remained unoccupied after they vacated it. There was ample precedent for the Sussexes to maintain two residences. William and Kate were gifted Anmer Hall on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk by the Queen, but their primary residence was Apartment 1A at Kensington Palace. Prince Charles retained Clarence House as his official residence and Highgrove in Gloucestershire for weekends in the country. Similarly, Princess Anne retained a private Buckingham Palace apartment—as does Prince Andrew. For the moment, though, the couple was firmly established in Frogmore,
There's information about their wedding photographer being hacked, which is new, I think.
In addition to the physical precautions at Frogmore, Harry and Meghan also began taking extra safety measures with digital information after they suffered a major data leak. On September 12, 2018, a computer programmer based in Russia managed to hack into an online cloud storage
account that contained over two hundred unseen photos of Harry and Meghan that had been taken by the photographer Alexi Lubomirski.
Among the stolen images were pictures of the couple sharing personal moments during their engagement photo series as well as others from their wedding day reception (including some of the Queen). The large set also included outtakes with eyes half closed and other unflattering moments meant for the trash can. The hacker leaked a handful of the photos to Tumblr. Many fans assumed they were fake, photoshopped images, but behind the scenes there was concern at Kensington Palace when they received a tip about the security breach. Harry and Meghan “were alarmed to hear that it was so easy to get such personal files of theirs,” a source close to the couple said. “The whole situation was a wake-up call.”
Welcome and I loved that clip.Have a mushroom willy
Last edited:
I hope that Nanny who was fired comes out of the woodwork to expose Meghan for the liar she is.
She was never pregnant so can't have been breastfeeding. Come on nanny......
We all know that he was born of a surrogate and that's the reason he doesn't have a title. Smeagol asked the Queen to give her mum a title so there's no way she would've turned one down for her son.
She was never pregnant so can't have been breastfeeding. Come on nanny......
We all know that he was born of a surrogate and that's the reason he doesn't have a title. Smeagol asked the Queen to give her mum a title so there's no way she would've turned one down for her son.
She seems so keen to use the word 'abuse' but she has not suffered abuse. İ don't get the feeling she is protecting the child any better, especially sitting in his nappies on his first birthday video. Again it's a case of her personality disorders preventing her from conforming, compromising, comprehending what it means to be royal. But İ do think at the core of the situation is the intense jealousy of Kate, and refusal to accept being part of a team respecting hierarchy and seniority. She just wants to be the star, and doesn't care how she achieves that, whether ambassador for Aesop's poo drops or deep fake woke-flake at a digital summit.......Meghan felt she was 'expected to serve Archie on a silver platter'
The Duchess of Sussex felt she was expected to 'serve Archie on a silver platter' by the same people who had 'been abusing her', new biography Finding Freedom claims.www.dailymail.co.uk
Speaking in the book, which was released today, an insider claimed Meghan said: 'The same people who have been abusing me want to see me serve my child on a silver platter.
'A child who is not going to be protected and doesn't have a title. How does that make sense? Tell that to any mother in the world.'
She's so full of nonsense and that makes it sound like they didn't choose to forgo a title for him but it was rather decided for them. Also in that article, she had the full on Royal christening for Archie, so all the pomp and circumstance whilst missing out the bits she didn't like so she could thumb her nose at us.
Same. No way would I have gone to the wedding.I can't believe that Harry treated his old friend Skippy so badly. It's a real insult not inviting him to the evening celebrations. He must have been really hurt by that. His old school friend not more important than celebs he doesn't even know.
If my best friend had done that to me I don't think that I would've turned up at all.
- Status