- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I wonder why that article is the in US edition of The Sun but not as far as I can see on the UK website?
The thing is that not everyone who went to that island would have been there to indulge in paedophilia or orgies and this article plainly proves that and fair play to her outing herself in the middle of this tit storm.Some will have traveled there for business reasons( he was indeed a business man besides being a bleep) and some will have been there a few times before catching on that there was bad stuff going on and beating a hasty retreat.
I'm happy for a good session of grabbing the old pitchfork and flaming torch and rooting out the bad guys in the village but sometimes the 'bad guys' are just genuinely innocent or naive people who made friends with a dodgy character.
This bothers me personally because many years ago a friend of ours was outed as a paedophile. He admitted it and has done time, but despite being in his company at least once a week and even spending weekends at his home we never ever had the slightest inkling and he was never regarded as pervey in any way.We were even questioned by the police after he was charged and it was traumatic and took a long time getting over. So I get how easy it is to be drawn into a mess like this and I understand someone choosing not to face an inquisition over a friendship with someone who turns out to be a piece of tit.
But all that aside I wonder what spin smeggy has put on her 'win'. I can imagine her blathering on at her mates "See, it's fine, your names will never be revealed, I've sorted it. Aitch and I know English law and we're home and dry so stop worrying darlings."
Her thorough legal training and experience at Pearson Specter (*) paid off!!!!But all that aside I wonder what spin smeggy has put on her 'win'. I can imagine her blathering on at her mates "See, it's fine, your names will never be revealed, I've sorted it. Aitch and I know English law and we're home and dry so stop worrying darlings."
(*) it's the name of the firm she "worked for" on Suits. Well one of its incarnations anyway. Although on the few episodes I've seen she just stood around uselessly, or was busy shagging someone in the filing room.
She will hand them each a banana that says "you are strong", "you can do this" (lie on the stand for me if called in as witness), "you are loved"The thing is that not everyone who went to that island would have been there to indulge in paedophilia or orgies and this article plainly proves that and fair play to her outing herself in the middle of this tit storm.Some will have traveled there for business reasons( he was indeed a business man besides being a bleep) and some will have been there a few times before catching on that there was bad stuff going on and beating a hasty retreat.
I'm happy for a good session of grabbing the old pitchfork and flaming torch and rooting out the bad guys in the village but sometimes the 'bad guys' are just genuinely innocent or naive people who made friends with a dodgy character.
This bothers me personally because many years ago a friend of ours was outed as a paedophile. He admitted it and has done time, but despite being in his company at least once a week and even spending weekends at his home we never ever had the slightest inkling and he was never regarded as pervey in any way.We were even questioned by the police after he was charged and it was traumatic and took a long time getting over. So I get how easy it is to be drawn into a mess like this and I understand someone choosing not to face an inquisition over a friendship with someone who turns out to be a piece of tit.
But all that aside I wonder what spin smeggy has put on her 'win'. I can imagine her blathering on at her mates "See, it's fine, your names will never be revealed, I've sorted it. Aitch and I know English law and we're home and dry so stop worrying darlings."
He does, & it’s clear what he’s saying..............if you’re listening! I don’t think MeggySue is
The barrister to the stars who is making the Duchess of Sussex's case: the legal teams profiled
The key figures at the heart of the High Court hearing
By Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter24 April 2020 • 6:14pm
The first stage of the virtual High Court case is under way Credit: PA
The first stage of the Duchess of Sussex's legal action against Associated Newspapers over its publication of a “private and confidential” letter was heard in a virtual High Court session. Robert Mendick profiles the key legal figures.
Mr Justice Warby
The High Court judge presiding over the Duchess of Sussex's legal action against the Mail on Sunday previously defended the same newspaper in a case brought by the Prince of Wales.
Sir Mark Warby QC, 61, acted for the tabloid newspaper after it was sued by Prince Charles for publishing extracts from his 1997 journal on his thoughts on the handover of Hong Kong to the Chinese.
Prince Charles’ legal action brought in 2006 was in itself a groundbreaking case. The heir to the throne had written a 3,000-word journal on his way back from the Hong Kong handover, under the heading "The Great Chinese Takeaway".
It was one of eight reports written after foreign trips in the 1990s that were passed to the Mail on Sunday by a disaffected former secretary in the prince's office. Copies of the journals had been circulated privately to the prince's friends.
Prince Charles had called the Chinese leadership "appalling old waxworks" and criticised government ministers.
The Mail on Sunday, represented by Sir Mark, had argued that it was legitimately publicising Prince Charles' views on matters of public importance and demonstrating his alleged interference in political affairs.
But the judge in that case was scathing about the newspaper's public interest defence, saying its contribution to public debate was "at best minimal".
Justice Warby back in 2006 Credit: Paul Grover
Sir Mark is reckoned by media lawyers to be one of the fairest judges in an area of law in which the judiciary has not always looked kindly on tabloid newspapers.
He is probably the leading expert on privacy law, which has become the favourite weapon for celebrities overtaking libel - as a basis for bringing cases against the media.
Sir Mark is joint editor and a co-author of The Law of Privacy and the Media.
During his time as a leading QC, Sir Mark acted in many of the key privacy cases that have shaped the law over the past 15 years, including representing the News of the World in the privacy claim brought by Max Mosley, the world motor racing boss, over allegations he had taken part in a “sick Nazi orgy”. The News of the World lost the 2008 trial and was ordered to pay £60,000 in a case with far-reaching consequences.
Sir Mark went to Bristol Grammar and then on to St Johns College Oxford before being called to the Bar in 1981. He was appointed a QC in 2002, before being sworn in as a High Court judge in 2014, after 32 years at the bar.
He was joint head of chambers at 5RB, where many of the brightest media lawyers practice including David Sherborne, who is representing the Duchess of Sussex in the ongoing legal action against the Mail on Sunday.
He also built up a strong reputation in sports law and Sir Mark becoming a specialist in sporting corruption cases. For 19 years, he was chief prosecuting counsel for the horse-racing authority.
In 2017, Sir Mark was appointed Judge in Charge of the Media and Communications List, effectively making him the most powerful media judge in the country.
David Sherborne
With a strong anti-media track record, described in some legal circles as ‘rabid’, David Sherborne has established himself as the celebrities’ barrister of choice. Mr Sherborne rose to prominence as the lead counsel for alleged victims of Press intrusion during the Leveson Inquiry into the conduct of newspapers. With his perma-tan, bouffant hair and line in sharp suits, he was often mistaken as he left and departed the Old Bailey as a celebrity himself. The Duchess of Sussex is just the latest in a long list of jaw-droppingly famous clients that also includes - according to his own profile on his chambers’ website - Diana, Princess of Wales, Cherie and Tony Blair, and Donald and Melania Trump. He has also acted for Sir Paul McCartney, Sir Elton John, the Beckhams and the supermodel Kate Moss among others.
Mr Sherborne is representing the Duchess of Sussex Credit: Getty Images
He was subjected to media scrutiny of his own when it was reported that he had visited the Greek island of Santorini with Carine Patry Hoskins, who was junior counsel to the Leveson Inquiry, days after public hearings had concluded in August 2013. Lord Justice Leveson dismissed any suggestion that his report into media standards could have been tainted by the alleged relationship between the two barristers.
Mr Sherborne has acted in a series of landmark privacy cases including for Michael Douglas and his wife Catherine Zeta-Jones who successfully subdued Hello! Magazine for more than £1m after it published unauthorised photographs of their wedding. He appeared victorious in gown and wig on the steps of the High Court alongside the Hollywood couple, much to the amusement of lawyers who said wearing the legal paraphernalia outside court was not the done thing.
Antony White QC
While David Sherborne might be considered flashy even, Antony White, his opposite number in the privacy claim, is perhaps the polar opposite. Fellow media lawyers describe Mr White QC as variously ‘solid’ or ‘unshowy’ but they are all agreed on his fearsome intellect. Some describe his intellect as intimidating.
Mr White gained a double first at Cambridge and has risen to become a leading silk in the field of defamation and privacy. He is a barrister at Matrix chambers, the predominantly human rights set co-founded by Cherie Blair among others. Mr White has acted in groundbreaking privacy cases including acting for the supermodel Naomi Campbell who successfully sued the Daily Mirror for breach of confidence and breach of the Data Protection Act. Chamber and Partners says of Mr White: “Quietly and methodically destroys an opponent’s argument rather than engaging in theatrics.”
Schillings
The legal firm representing the Duchess of Sussex has earned itself the reputation as the most aggressive in the business. Commentators have suggested it is too aggressive. Founded in 1984 by Keith Schilling, its chairman and senior partner, the firm launched on the British legal world the ‘super-injunction’, not always to great effect. It acted for Ryan Giggs, the Manchester United footballer, who was trying to protect his reputation over his private life. The super injunction obtained by Giggs was lifted sparking a widespread political debate.
The firm also acted for Sir Philip Green in his legal claim against the Daily Telegraph which was investigating allegations that the retail tycoon had used non-disclosure agreements to pay off staff who had made complaints of sexual harassment and race discrimination against him. Schillings secured an injunction against the newspaper but Sir Philip subsequently conceded defeat in the legal action.
And they will slip on the peel and fall on their arses.She will hand them each a banana that says "you are strong", "you can do this" (lie on the stand for me if called in as witness), "you are loved"
“Floppy Doppy”!
That article, when one reads between the lines, is quite humiliating towards Harry. He’s inept in the kitchen so the hired help had to step in. The man is almost 40. My arse did he cook anything. It was Uber Eats all the way, including the cake!
The Judge is having absolutely none of it. I think Meghan must have thought she would definitely win the case or intimidate the Daily Mail by Royal connection alone. Karma’s a witch! When you start sueing everyone, you can’t win them all.
She feels the need to try hard as they need the money since they are only mere millionaires...
Over on tumblr there is proof they did exactly that. They set up the whole drone story to generate interest in themselves. There’s receipts.
Here it is
Attachments
What Megz did next..
Coming up on August 14th, she will share a platform in a new 'Women's Newsroom' wokefest event with Democratic VP hopeful Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and Melinda Gates.
www.glamour.com
Coming up on August 14th, she will share a platform in a new 'Women's Newsroom'
Meghan Markle Will Join ‘The 19th* Represents Summit’ to Talk Gender, Representation, and the Future of News
The duchess has participated in countless interviews. This one will be different.
I fail to see how she is an expert on any of these things (gender equality etc).What Megz did next..
Coming up on August 14th, she will share a platform in a new 'Women's Newsroom'wokefestevent with Democratic VP hopeful Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and Melinda Gates.
Meghan Markle Will Join ‘The 19th* Represents Summit’ to Talk Gender, Representation, and the Future of News
The duchess has participated in countless interviews. This one will be different.
It's interesting that Meghan is getting all the gigs, doesn't anyone want Harry? And she's only well known now because of him!
Poor Harry has been relegated to the role of house husband
not too long then until he is of no further use to her.
Wow, minge doing a selfie!? 
Attachments
Sad Sussex squad are out attacking people in the YouTube comments of the gma video reporting on her so called win in the courts... Completely vile comments towards people who've just simply commented that meghan is no angel and called the press herself and apparently according to the squad that's racist to think like that!!
Why is she speaking at this event? She has done nothing to empower other women; she just threw them under the bus. I also don't think she can ever be a politician. That means she will have to ACTUALLY work, and less time for prancing around on private jet, hugging everyone, batting her eyelash a million times, and plotting to sue everyone. I think her dream job is to live a wealthy life and do things to make herself feel important and relevant.What Megz did next..
Coming up on August 14th, she will share a platform in a new 'Women's Newsroom'wokefestevent with Democratic VP hopeful Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and Melinda Gates.
Meghan Markle Will Join ‘The 19th* Represents Summit’ to Talk Gender, Representation, and the Future of News
The duchess has participated in countless interviews. This one will be different.
Love Princess of Petty
Could be in a thread title.
Princess of Petty and her Has Been royal.
Whatever deal the RF gave them for this 12 month period seems aimed at getting her back to work. That's the only plausible reason for her colossal PR bill to be tolerated.I fail to see how she is an expert on any of these things (gender equality etc).
It's interesting that Meghan is getting all the gigs, doesn't anyone want Harry? And she's only well known now because of him!
Poor Harry has been relegated to the role of house husband
I'm not sure if Haz is employable but better for him to be doing not much aka Travalwotsit until the dust settles on the inevitable divorce.
There are a lot of the Sugar squad that are accusing the judge of being in the Mail's pocket or the Royal Family's to slander her about leaking to the press blaming everyone but her. Rolling my eyes. Yeah because of course the judge is out to show trial Megz, just as everyone else in the UK is plotting against her. Obviously. It's not possible that what has been blatantly clear for years not to mention the simplest - the Harkles leak like a sieve to Scooby Do and others whilst being entirely hypocritical about it! To even consider it is to be racist and snobbish and terrible. But that's the type of hyperbole they themselves whipped up around them.
- Status