I agree BS because it was the kids first day at school too. They started the day as Cambridges, ended the day as Cornwalls and Cambridges, then became Wales all within a few hours. There's no way she'd have left all that to the nanny to explain.But this is the proper way of things surely?
children of the dying person, it’s not a pap op it’s the loss of a human being. The Wales children needed their mum, and it’s not like in my family or anyone else’s - she was The Queen! There were still, probably distressingly, legal things to do and ensure protocol was met.
this is just bullshit in my opinion
Also, how is it Smegs is begging for mother of the year awards for staying with her kids in Cali, but planting stories that Catherine is resentful? Why isn't the story that Catherine stayed for her children, despite her grief? I hope the RF are monitoring these things closely. It shows nothing has changed.The trouble is with ambiguous statements like this, is its far to easy to take it in different ways.
Catherine could very well have said, something along the lines, of I wish I could be there with you William, at your grandmothers bedside, to show compassion and support to her husband, knowing full well, it was completely impossible, because someone had to be there for her children!
Her children are old enough to know whats going on, and to need their mother there to give them support! And in this instance, Catherine wasnt desperately needed in Scotland, and was taking the sensible and logical decision!!
Yes, but. The children had their nanny who was fully capable of holding down the fort. Grandma Middleton could have popped over as well Catherine could have flown to Scotland and seen TQ. She could have flown back the same night and been there in the morning to explain things to the children. It’s not like kids were glued to CNN or the BBC news. They could have been kept from the news.
Someone over on Tumblr did a nice side-by-side of the lustworthy hunk and his stunning wife, so I've taken the liberty to re-create it here.one of the comments - that he could still be in the UK - in Rehab??
Thank you @toninottony, well done! And @vretch for the recap.Thanks for the new Fred and Title.... Coronation
I'm still catchimg up, just starting this thread... On the last @Cinnamon.girl gave details on HG Tudors latest You Tube and mentioned the Harkles have receipts... What receipts are the Harkles supposed to have?
Thank you Cinny for the detailed post from HG Tudor, it was very interesting![]()
This. Exactly this. Likewise, I never click on to the online ‘film type’ gossip, the couple of times I did I just thought - they know nothing, they have no sources, it’s all speculation. Not worth my time. It is bloody infuriating (and I speak as a fellow creative in another field) to have one’s work absolutely plundered without permission, purely to shine someone else’s star, no matter how many platitudes they throw your way. It feels like a violation and I know how Chita must be feeling. Open up to the universe Chita, so many good vibes and so much true friendshipunpopular opinion: i don't particularly like the TRG channel. nor BookWorm nor most of the other megxiters. i feel that they've long crossed into Q(uora)Anon territory, only because i'm a devoted believer in the lex parsimoniea. on the subject of Chita's images used in the latest TRG video, i do find it crass to monetise them, it's reminiscent of those companies who ask artists for their work and pay them in "exposure" and "clout". as someone who has worked in the field for the last 20 years, that's a very big NO. TRG could have easily contacted Chita on Twitter and asked for permission, but she obviously thought that just mentioning Chita is enough. well, as a "citizen journalist", she should have known better. anyway, @Chita, we love you and we love your cartoons and we feel your anger and frustration at how your creativity and art have been abused. a big hug!
Agree. Kate wasn’t allowed to go because Sparry was spewing about his vile untrustworthy wife being barred. Despite all the stress she had caused the Queen in her final years and the fact she was a virtual stranger. And the fact that she’d probably have helped to herself to a few trinkets and taken a few snapshots while she was there!To be honest I remember on the day I had a suspicion that Kate hadn't gone so that it gave them a good reason to not have Meghan there too. At the same time however I'm sure she wanted to be the ones to tell the children so I think she likely would have chosen to stay at home anyway. If it was the case that she wanted to go but was only stopped because of Meghan I don't blame her for resenting her. Kate knew the Queen for 20+ years and has lost all her own grandparents, so was close to her.
It's always Kate who is expected to make the sacrifices. Post-partum with a newborn and 2 small children after a difficult labour and she was expected to drop everything to help Meghan. Now she's expected to keep quiet and put on a brave face whilst constantly being trashed by their PR.
We miss you @wibbleW
I’m pretty sure @wibble is the author of the joke Harry book! And also the genesis of blaming Ashley cole
I mean, truly the most truly and stunning and gorgeous and beautiful duo to have ever walked on this earth. Ever. All men are jealous of Hazno, all women of 43. The gods walk among us mere mortals!Someone over on Tumblr did a nice side-by-side of the lustworthy hunk and his stunning wife, so I've taken the liberty to re-create it here.![]()