Sherry and Bendicks mints at the ready...
Suppose what KClll does with his own money is up to him. As long as it is not the downtrodden public coughing up for it, I don't care. We will never know if KClll is still helping the overseas ones with their security, it wouldn't surprise me if he is. It all seems to have gone quiet on that front ..... does anybody know what's happening with his security claim?From The Mirror, have we heard this already? Think we have.
Very expensive at 3 million.
"King Charles has risked further infuriating his younger son after it merged the monarch is likely to pay for Prince Andrew’s private security - a move not afforded to Harry and Meghan.
The Duke of York will lose the privilege of protection from the Met Police which is paid for by the public as he does not perform royal duties.
Instead private security will take over the disgraced prince’s protection at a cost of around £3 million a year which is believed to be paid for by the monarch, the Telegraph reported.
However the move is sure to anger the Duke of Sussex, who lost his taxpayer-funded police security when the couple stepped back from royal duties in 2020."
Quoting own post shamelessly.Yes Happy Lady you could well be right, apart from the fact that I can't see that PA is creating any "nonsense" at all. Unless I'm missing something, what I meant was that P.A. is no threat to the RF, he has been neutralized already but is still being cut down further, gratuitously. What does removing his office achieve? He is the Queen's son but has no right to an office? He's the Duke of York still. He's obviously had this "office" for a long time, and as far as I can see it's not exactly been a hotbed of insurrection against KC or P.A. demanding to be reinstated.
On the other hand, the Stoats are a huge threat to the Monarchy but Chuck has done nothing whatsoever to neutralise them. All the "nonsense" is coming only from them and not Andrew and we never hear from him. So to me so far this stinks unless there's more we don't know and PA is a threat. Can't see it though.
As you say "KC needs to do similarly with his wayward son". But I don't think he will, and think this focus on the already emasculated PA is PR deflection to draw attention away from C's indulgence of the Stoats and make him look strong. Nil points.
Separating family dinners from removing PA's office is splitting hairs as the man who PA is has been totally cut down by his brother. At dinner and in his office. What shreds are left? Supporting him behind closed doors by inviting his ex to lunch? Imo that is worse than nothing. Walking to Church is a "family gathering" but he's been banned.
Seems he's supposed to be hidden like a leper, and I bet Anne and Edward aren't happy about this. The Queen would be livid or in tears. It Stinks, and though PA is awful this is all wrong. No office. He can set one up somewhere else but that was his BP office where his mother was. I'm not listening to the speech, not interested in his platitudes until he sorts himself out and gets his priorities right. Which he won't.
I opened the after dinner mints a few days ago...Sherry and Bendicks mints at the ready...
googles Tudor productions...New Meghan film dropping in January
Didn't that channel come up before?googles Tudor productions...
It appears to be a youtube channel with under 1k subscribers, founded in 2021 according to LinkedIn
Home | Tudor Productions
Tudor Productions is a London-based production company founded in 2021 that specialises in fresh and engaging content that provides an insightful look at the British Royal family.www.tudorproductions.co.uk
Hugs.I'm feeling a bit emotional this evening. It was the anniversary of my Dad's death on the 20th (22 years since he died) and it's the anniversary of my mother's death in January (26 years) and it's the first Christmas since my partner of 22 years upped and left. He came from home one night in May, said he was leaving and 2 weeks later off he went. I still don't know why, he'd not given any indication that he was unhappy but had obviously been planning it for a while.
My youngest daughter and her partner are coming to stay tonight and I'm spending Christmas day with my middle daughter and husband so looking forward to that.
having had a look at the channel, it is all trailers. so I've no idea where any of these documentaries are availableDidn't that channel come up before?
I'm feeling a bit emotional this evening. It was the anniversary of my Dad's death on the 20th (22 years since he died) and it's the anniversary of my mother's death in January (26 years) and it's the first Christmas since my partner of 22 years upped and left. He came from home one night in May, said he was leaving and 2 weeks later off he went. I still don't know why, he'd not given any indication that he was unhappy but had obviously been planning it for a while.
My youngest daughter and her partner are coming to stay tonight and I'm spending Christmas day with my middle daughter and husband so looking forward to that.
I'm feeling a bit emotional this evening. It was the anniversary of my Dad's death on the 20th (22 years since he died) and it's the anniversary of my mother's death in January (26 years) and it's the first Christmas since my partner of 22 years upped and left. He came from home one night in May, said he was leaving and 2 weeks later off he went. I still don't know why, he'd not given any indication that he was unhappy but had obviously been planning it for a while.
My youngest daughter and her partner are coming to stay tonight and I'm spending Christmas day with my middle daughter and husband so looking forward to that.
So the apology from the Sun is the publicity stunt rather than the actual article (just for clarification). Stating that they have had no direct apology themselves.Harkles say JC was a publicity stunt
Harry and Meghan reject The Sun's Clarkson apology - calling it 'nothing more than a PR stunt'
A spokesperson for the Duchess said: "While the public absolutely deserves the publication's regrets for their dangerous comments, we shouldn't be in this situation if The Sun did not continue to profit off of and exploit hate, violence and misogyny."news.sky.com