Suck it Megz. You wish you could get this close but you Markled it. Any dipshit w manners can get close... but you'll forever be watched. And judged. By us. And you too Haz. Feck orf.
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
![Love-you gesture :love_you_gesture: 🤟](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f91f.png)
![Smiling face with 3 hearts :smiling_face_with_3_hearts: 🥰](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f970.png)
Last edited:
She is so delusional. And expected special treatment just coz she was dating the spare.Did she honestly think they wanted her for faux philanthropy and humanitarianism?
Like nobody's business!Gagging, don’t forget the gagging…thirst.
Had she even had a magazine cover before Harry? Harry not realising he was being used after that shows just how dumb he is. Literally everyone could see it and he fell for it.How many reminders does she need that she only gets any publicity because she is linked to Royalty.
‘Hollywood philathrophy is PR philantrophy’. We should post this…over and over…all of us…under every single article. Because it is absolutely true. And exposes her phoniness.Her ‘Philanthropy’![]()
Thank you Cass Bear.
Another lie by smeg. Hopefully all the chickens are coming home to roost now!
I have never heard a blowjob called a snow job before.
That’s why, IMO, anyone who has submitted anything needs their head tested. I can’t imagine the average sugar having anything inspirational (or even rational) to share, so if they’ve flooded the platform then happy daysI know I’ve posted this before, but I think it bears repeating. The 5% distribution requirement for charities is mandated by the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) and has nothing to do with the fact that the charitable foundation is formed under Delaware law. See, e.g., https://www.sapling.com/8069385/distribution-requirements-501c3-charities. There are other reasons companies register as Delaware corporations, such as the fact that they have their own chancery courts that deal with corporate disputes, but the charitable distribution requirement comes from the federal IRS regulations.
One of my issues with the Harkles’ foundation is the fact that their website asks people to submit inspiring personal stories or some such BS, but states that anyone submitting a story gives up their rights to said story. So essentially they are grifting for ideas since they can’t come up with any on their own.
Has anyone on here ever written to P&G about anything whatsoever, and...you know...actually received a bona fide reply with a name and a signature? One that would pass a fact check? Perhaps it could be submitted to Farchewell as an inspirational story. One of genuine success.That’s why, IMO, anyone who has submitted anything needs their head tested. I can’t imagine the average sugar having anything inspirational (or even rational) to share, so if they’ve flooded the platform then happy days![]()