OK thanks again. From your post above
"They highly likely met in my book, my list of concessions (Harkles) is longer than the combined lists for Anne/kids,Edward ,Andrew /York girls, and Linley."
Next question: If you think a meeting was "highly likely" and that the Clarence House briefing was true, where were the children and how is it they didn't arrive or leave the UK or arrive back in the US? I'm very confused.
I think
@Evangelina was explaining the difference between journo gossip and the CH Royal briefing, and from what she said there's a huge difference between these two instances. BP don't routinely comment on anything, do they, but the CH briefing was very specific.
''Next question: If you think a meeting was "highly likely" and that the Clarence House briefing was true, where were the children and how is it they didn't arrive or leave the UK or arrive back in the US? I'm very confused.''
It's a bit of a painful conversation , if I would engage in the surrogacy rumours, this would be my third Royal surrogacy .
And what is ''normal'' for me, possibly isn't normal for you.
However I explained the tech parts, which logicaly nobody would belive, which is also fine.
The fact that ''theorists'' don't have ''evidence '' means nothing except that the Harkles didn't allow ''random snaps, by the public'' for PR (these are mostly Royal assistant and RPO's doing the snaps,btw, or shop owners/ random public members assisting with the media leak)
The allowed snaps, just created controversy , which contributed to the initial ''overshadowing .''
When a terrorist target(they all are by default ) doesn't want to be photographed -they aren't .
Royals aren't photographed in private capacity and private places unless they allow it.
The children if photographed , will be removed.
Aldi can go to school one day with his nanny, the school/place will know, all parents and their kids will think the nanny is his mother.
If he outs himself, place gets changed.
Or they arived on separate planes, purely because of Harry's paranoia , the Royal rule of travel in his case looks simple.
See'' they will kill Peg, like Diana .''
The above is however for the sake of conversation , its completely irrelevant standing next to the fact that the princely titles aren't blocked during the Queen's reign, because they are automatic .
The kids, as prince /princess will have the ''established narrative '' of private citizens , while getting titles, good luck to the Cambs kids, they are going to need it.
www.dailymail.co.uk
