Yeah Louis has grown so quickly and IMO will be taller than William, but when you look at the Chicken Coop photo of Archie and the photo from the parade it looks like Archie hasn't grown.
View attachment 1402272View attachment 1402273
If he loses-he doesn't get to pay at all.(police is not for sale, or so they claim )
If Young was at the Sandringham Summit, then his role was a part of the ''way ahead meetings'' and then it's something a bit different .
If Harry sent an e-mail as claimed , nothing is verbal.
If Young relied anything anywhere verbally , then he should be fired.
If no corespondence exists between Palace-Ravec then nothing was forwarded .
Also, there's no ''verbal'' in their world, that would be deadly.
It will be a ‘well I’ll pay for it myself then’ and he’ll have been told ‘you can’t, RPOs aren’t for sale’ and that will be the extent of his offer to pay.I disagree.
If it was suggested and wasn’t forwarded, there is a logical reason why. Police aren’t up for purchase. It’s a ludicrous claim. Police are members of the government and there to equitably protect all people based on an assessed danger. (Well theoretically). They’re not up for purchase by Royals. The optics of Royals being able to purchase bespoke government services at their whim is FAR worse than the optics of a really stupid brain fart of a Harry idea not getting passed onto Priti Patel by Sir Edward.
Im guessing that these photos are a response to the negativity given to H & M after the jubilee, and a response to the idea of the children not exisiting and never being seen. So a random photo of Archie and Harry is published.I think it IS Hazno.
It might be Aldi, who knows or cares tbh.
But it's not Smeghan. Too thin/wrong body shape, wrong hair, wrong feet and the way the Massive Hat conveniently covers her in every single angle that's been released, makes it all way too staged. How can "a bystander" manage to get so many angles on Hazno and the kid but the woman in the pics is All Hat in every pic and no hint of a side shot?
The question is why? Why does Hazno need us to see him in random Wyoming, with a kid, and a fake wife? What is he trying to tell us or distract us from thinking? Have they split, and she really is staying in hotels apart from him?
And where is Lidl? Don't little girls like or deserve to see parades too? Supposedly they've revealed her to us now, so why hide her away again?
Where is Dorito? Why was she wheeled out at that dodgy fake awards ceremony only to never be seen again since?
Or her fillers haven’t settled yetTo miss being right IN the 4th of July photos as she always manages to do, Markle must’ve had one helluva ZIT on her nose!
I imagined it more as a case of Harry being told his police protection would be scaled down. I don’t think it would be completely removed but reassessed on an event basis.I was thinking about paying the costs for all the court cases!! Not for paying for police protection!!
A court case like this must be costing thousands of someone's money! If Harry wins then he doesnt have to pay court costs, but if he loses then he does!!!!
I get what you mean about everything being in writing, except, being realistic, surely there often isnt enough time to go through everything in minute detail in every meeting. Surely RAVEC is going to be a busy government dept, responsible for security for the entire Royal family. To go through everything in minute detail for 10 to 20 people, to update everyone concerned, is going to take hours.
Was this RAVEC meeting convened just to discuss the security of Harry and his family, or one tagged onto a more regular meeting? I can see something like 15 minutes tops allocated to discuss future security for Harry and his family, surely every single thing cannot have been discussed within such a short time frame?
The actual police detail would be responsible for day today security ......surely they wouldnt be expected to go through detailed daily plans with RAVEC every day in advance, and then to debrief RAVEC daily after the event.
I agree this is all a ploy to make us believe in Archie. They know people are questioning if the children exist, so first they release a photo of Lillibucks and now Archie.Im guessing that these photos are a response to the negativity given to H & M after the jubilee, and a response to the idea of the children not exisiting and never being seen. So a random photo of Archie and Harry is published.
It takes a few goes....and needs quite a bit of pushing as hardly anyone actually believes it is them! I did think it was a lookalike, until we start to get pixellated photos of Archies face.
It also gives strength to their argument about keeping the children safe and secure......if snapshots taken by a friend and published on social media are then used by the media. Nasty nasty untrustworthy daily mail, publishing unauthorised photos of Archie. ( im being very very sarcastic here.....if it was a friend of Me again who put the photos up on her social media........then how are these now private photos?)
But I would imagine we can now Expect yet another court case against the Mail for intruding on their privacy!!!
She is a festering ulcer on the arse of humanity!Or her fillers haven’t settled yet
Don't go looking for logic when it comes to the Harkles and 'muh privacy', Scotch.I agree this is all a ploy to make us believe in Archie. They know people are questioning if the children exist, so first they release a photo of Lillibucks and now Archie.
I still don't believe that they bought the children to the UK during the Jubilee.
Can they really sue anyone who has published these photos? It's a strange old world if the rich and famous can do this all the time. Going to a huge parade attended by the general public isn't somewhere they could expect privacy. A degree of privacy would probably be expected at somewhere like the polo club but can't be expected in a public place.
And only pixelate Farchie? Do the other children not matter?Bit late now isn’t it? The photos have been released and people have seen them. Why pixelate them now?
I don't think his arms are that hairy.I see the Daily Mail have posted more pictures from the 4th of July Parade in Wyoming that we haven't previously seen and I have to say that I am still not convinced that this is Harry and Meghan in this picture. The beard looks too long to be Harry's and doesn't look like it has been shaved in quite a while, the women in the picture looks to have brown hair and the man seems to have very hairy arms. I have compared the arms to when he appeared in the acting segment for Travalyst and they don't look the same. So maybe it is them, but I still have my doubts as it seems strange that there are no clear pictures of Meghan. I have just seen that somebody has pointed out that the ear looks different and it is funny how in the previous photos we have seen the man had a black ring on yet in this photo the ring is gold.
View attachment 1402076View attachment 1402158 View attachment 1402098
Good job I added the screenshots to the media gallery yesterday thenThe DM have also pixilated Archie's face.
I don’t think the first photo is him. If you look at all the photos, this person seems to be wearing different trousers.Still not buying the Wyoming bullshit.
No wristband
View attachment 1403583
with wristband after it was pointed out
View attachment 1403589
Something (apart from the whores minge) here stinks
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?