She didn't even give him a spit wash to get the lippy off his faceVery true very true
Note that W&K managed to kiss each other without any face grabbing or making everyone else want to throw up
YES this is what I want, a drama free HoS.They really want this narrative to stick but no one is buying it.
Royal Reporters are missing Old Harry and think they can get him back.
They bet on the wrong horse and now they are licking their wounds shamefully. William's reign will have no drama.
View attachment 1397096
William needs to focus on the bigger things. If ever his own children feud, then he has a responsibility to resolve the conflict.
He has no obligation to do so with Harry.
William must 'sort out row' with Harry to prove himself as future king
PRINCE WILLIAM needs to "sort out" the row with his brother Prince Harry if he wants to live up to his destiny as future king, a royal expert has claimed.www.express.co.uk
There's a couple of photos like this that were posted here before but worth seeing again.
That Duncan bloke is talking out his ass (like most of them). Why the hell should PW do anything to appease that rat faced brother of his? My ‘future king’ decision if I was PW would be to remove H and TW from all things Royal. No titles, no residences, feck all to do with us now. PWB is ‘living his best life’ leave him there to drown in it.They really want this narrative to stick but no one is buying it.
Royal Reporters are missing Old Harry and think they can get him back.
They bet on the wrong horse and now they are licking their wounds shamefully. William's reign will have no drama.
View attachment 1397096
William needs to focus on the bigger things. If ever his own children feud, then he has a responsibility to resolve the conflict.
He has no obligation to do so with Harry.
William must 'sort out row' with Harry to prove himself as future king
PRINCE WILLIAM needs to "sort out" the row with his brother Prince Harry if he wants to live up to his destiny as future king, a royal expert has claimed.www.express.co.uk
"...a pretty minor dispute..."???They really want this narrative to stick but no one is buying it.
Royal Reporters are missing Old Harry and think they can get him back.
They bet on the wrong horse and now they are licking their wounds shamefully. William's reign will have no drama.
View attachment 1397096
William needs to focus on the bigger things. If ever his own children feud, then he has a responsibility to resolve the conflict.
He has no obligation to do so with Harry.
William must 'sort out row' with Harry to prove himself as future king
PRINCE WILLIAM needs to "sort out" the row with his brother Prince Harry if he wants to live up to his destiny as future king, a royal expert has claimed.www.express.co.uk
I’ll just throw this out there for shits and giggles. It also has……Found an interesting connection to who may be in Jackson Hole Wyoming which is really bizarre
People also ask
What celebrities have homes in Jackson Hole Wyoming?
View attachment 1396489
This ranching community maintains its cowboy roots, but has a glamorous edge that attracts visitors and second home-owners like Kanye West and Kim Kardashian, Harrison Ford, Sandra Bullock, Brad Pitt, Pippa Middleton, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Matthew McConaughey, and more.
Women need to stop being scared of being labelled a TERF. It means nothing, and it’s just a way of shutting down the conversations the activists don’t want to have. It’s like screaming racist at people who aren’t actually racist but don’t agree with your agenda.Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists.
I am a proud Terf. Except I'm not a radical feminist.
No Haz. If indeed the flat packs are real, they bear no resemblance. At all. Your mums looks have been passed down to one person only …. And that is your older, more successful, more important and WAY more handsome brother. Soz
You're welcome.Thank you @Evangelina for taking the time to clarify this. As I understand it, what you say is:
A Clarence House Press Briefing is to give to a group of invited journalists information approved by the RF. It's given by a Royal source (as in this case), and the source tells the journo the truth (or lie) that was approved by the RF.
If a mistake happens it is quickly corrected by the RF.
So if the reported meeting with the grandchildren was one such "mistake" the RF would have already put out a denial in the press.
What the invited group of journos was told by the Royal source, about PC and Camilla meeting the Flatpacks, was approved by the RF.
So they said they met them, but they didn't.
I suspect that CH is relying on public scepticism here, people not believing the Snarkles brought the children and concluding that the meeting is a lie and it's more Sunshine Suxx PR.
I think it's a joint CH / Snarkle lie, but CH is hoping it will slip below the radar and people will call BS and ignore it as more Snarkle lies - when on this occasion it wasn't.
You've explained the difference between the "source" of William's war comment reporting and the Clarence House source.
That Duncan bloke is talking out his ass (like most of them). Why the hell should PW do anything to appease that rat faced brother of his? My ‘future king’ decision if I was PW would be to remove H and TW from all things Royal. No titles, no residences, feck all to do with us now. PWB is ‘living his best life’ leave him there to drown in it.
OK thanks again. From your post aboveYou're welcome.
Bib. 1
Correct .
The rest I don't know about.
Particularly this :
''So they said they met them, but they didn't.''
Bib2
It seems that this is seen as the desired outcome by the PR Guru's.
The problem is that the PR Guru , the ultimate , know it all , god of media control is Charles .
They highly likely met in my book, my list of concessions (Harkles) is longer than the combined lists for Anne/kids,Edward ,Andrew /York girls, and Linley.
Depending on how one sees it (for me it's :May God/force help them all, and us) it's a stereotype of a manipulative appeal to values(family), emotion (children) and upper echelons of the establishment(impacts media) who often believe in the religious elements of forgiveness .
See AoC being roped in to setup that Andrew ''want's forgiveness '' which was a ploy to eliminate him/keep the negative coverage.
Everyone reacted to artificialy created outrage, as predicted and it worked.
Andrew probably reacted, hence the backpedaling (easily, I was'' speaking in general terms''), however traction can't be beaten , so teh evil Andrew ''is pushing for ways back in'' is mainstream now. People have low levels of understanding about the , well politics/technical side of the Monarchy so it's truly easy to sell them everything .
Remember the Spectator article I posted here, the only one that actually even dared to mention the methods used.
I think @Evangelina was explaining the difference between journo gossip and the CH Royal briefing, and from what she said there's a huge difference between these two instances. BP don't routinely comment on anything, do they, but the CH briefing was very specific.But @Cinnamon.girl I don't think CH or KP corrected the "William" lie, ( about the war comment), did they?
I thought other journalists did that.
So we can't assume CH would correct this latest "lie" ( if it is one) by issuing an official statement denying or confirming the flatpack reunion.
Maybe in due course, some other journalists who were present will say it was never said...or maybe they will confirm it did.
I think the jury is still out at the moment as to whether PC and Camilla actually had that gushingly joyful reunion with Daughter-in-law Megain and their grandchildren.
It's a side effect of MSN.Does anyone know how to archive articles when you need to click on 'more' or 'continue' to read the rest of the article? Just the standard copying the URL shows the page before you've clicked on the continue, rather than after:
Example
Harry Prepares for Showdown in Police Security Lawsuit Against Govern…
archived 6 Jul 2022 17:37:45 UTCarchive.ph
He's more like a Diana fan than her son, it's really embarrassing and pathetic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?