Harry and Meghan #20 Meghan has lost and it's going to cost

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I know when KP was refurbished for Will & Kate, much was made if the fact that Kate has 2 kitchens. A normal family one and a catering one, when they hold receptions etc at their apartment.
could be the same at Anmer



Yes I’ve heard this. There’s a photo somewhere where she looks very like one of the sons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I don't understand this.
They call the Mail the "Fail", derogatorally (is that a word? duck knows😅.) Nor would a paper dox a number of people over a crappy c list actress. It would be press suicide and a half decent SJW pro bono lawyer would crucify them just for shits n giggles.

I really don't know what the feck this is about to be honest, so I find it hard to comment on, even though it smacks of being in some way juicy.

I need help. Words of one syllable please for the chronically thick.
i felt the same. I couldn’t quite get my head round what was being said but had the feeling there was something interesting in there.
One thing I do know, I’ve learnt a hell of a lot since I joined this site! 😂😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 15
That article in the Irish Independent is one of the most racist anti-semetic pieces I’ve read by a journalist. Quite bizarre.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 6
The Queen.......has a soft spot......for Odummr?!?! WHY?!?!!!!!! 🤢🤢🤢
Generalising here, obviously, but in the main the UK loved the Obamas. To the point that when he left office there were a fair few memes doing the rounds asking if we could borrow him to be our Prime Minister for a few years if the US didn't want him any more.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Haha
Reactions: 21
These threads are moving so fast!
Just to say Happy Birthday to Charlotte, she looks lovely in that outfit and doing a great deed. She's being raised well.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
I know when KP was refurbished for Will & Kate, much was made if the fact that Kate has 2 kitchens. A normal family one and a catering one, when they hold receptions etc at their apartment.
could be the same at Anmer



Yes I’ve heard this. There’s a photo somewhere where she looks very like one of the sons.
[/

There are some fine examples of the crap Kate got in the comments section at the bottom of the DM article - for example:

Sorry this plastic princess has not saved the monarchy. As far as I am concerned she has destroyed it.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 8
Morning Ladies it was Mrs Aunties Birthday yesterday and Gin might have been taken so be gentle.

I am a little surprised that my old friend Mark Stephens has been spouting excitedly about this matter. Mark, the media's goto Entertainment Lawyer (because, well, he looks like one) has lost his touch recently. He was involved in another, in many ways, comparable horlicks with that British diver described by the lovely Elon Musk as a "pweirdo guy". I dont know what pweirdo Guy got up to in Thailand, but god did he ever get fucked over. Frankly he would have had a good case here - just not, alas, in Elon's Home State. American jurisdictions are so sophisticated.

There was a lesson in that case, now what was it? Ah yes, thats it: dont sue billionairres because you think they'll pay you off, because if there is anything at all legally wrong with your case they will leave you humiliated and penniless; and they dont give a duck what you or anyone else thinks about them, or how much it costs them. Its a matter of survival for their wealth and sometimes they just do it for shits and giggles.

Anyway the bottom line, in what is a delicious Judgment (one for the connoisseur of the slowly inserted eviscerating tool), is that Skidmarks Boys (I guess shes the type who cant stand actual powerful legal women) tried to make the case about the "values" of the Daily Mail. For some bizarre reason, betting the courts would allow themselves (in the narrow, nerdy and specialised fields of Privacy Intrusion and Copyright) to be turned into a second Leverson enquiry. I can imagine the excited scenes in some boardroom full of tit Art and biscuits (with Harry in a corner wondering if theyre at the Accountants again) whilst Megs is sold the dream of becoming the peoples champion against the evil press who killed the woman she has been necro-stalking. Oh dear....very very big mistake.

So the Claim says that the Mail acquired her letter and published parts of it misleadingly in breach of her copyright and privacy, not as a newspaper releasing information in the public interest but BECAUSE: (a) they were engaged in a Campaign to destroy or damage her (for some unspecified reason "Is it becoz I is black?"); (b) in pursuit of which they had deliberately "stirred up" the problem between her and Daddy in the first place; and (c) they had acted throughout dishonestly and maliciously.

The lawyers seem to have forgotten (or more likely they just thought it would be a smash and grab as Skids was at the time beloved by us grateful peasants as a touch of Holywood hooker glamour in our mud stained lives) that its not good enough simply to claim things, you also have to indicate what evidence or legal arguments you might be going to rely on to prove them or what are the defendants supposed to be defending? You cant disprove a general allegation that you're a bit of a bleep - you need specific, teapot throwing bridesmaid humiliating, detail.

The response of Megatrons lawyers to having this pointed out to them before it got to the Application was a small masterpiece of deluded snotty arrogance and clearly got up the Judges nose as he takes Sherbourne to the woodshed. Ruling unappeallably, that in respect of all 3 arguments set out above they had either failed to make out proper legal claims; or failed to indicate just what facts and matters they claimed demonstrated them; and crucially that these mistakes were so fundamental that they couldnt be put right by simply amending the Claim and must be struck out. Elementary legal errors in the Skegness County Court.

Now the Mail still have the basic problem of explaining why publishing Megs's weirdo Magna Carta wasnt actionable of itself. On its face its a private document and no-one else is mad enough to (admit to) having written it BUT without all these aggravating factors its not actually worth that much in damages and anyway it had already been released by the 5 stooges; and crucially Daddy to whom it was sent (and could thus waive any confidentiality or copyright of Megans and have it published) had co-operated with the article and thus it was not a breach of her rights.

The judge has said, as they do after theyve left you bleeding to death, that you can always staunch the wounds (difficult if its your head theyve lopped off) put your case properly and have another go - but the question is can she? You need brains, grit and money not built in kneepads to win against utter bastards.

Have a nice day Im off out with the dog..... what I think she's fucked. Her lawyers wil have known after the hearing (when he gave them such a hard time and said theyd have judgment the legal equivalent of straight away) that they'd gone down with all hands; and in the circumstances their response is feeble. I imagine theyve spent the intervening 7 days preparing the client "No dont get your hopes too high we always said this was a uniquely difficult case.... The judges family owned sugar plantations.... Hows loveable scamp Harry?"

My bet is she will at some suitable point in the news cycle discontinue blaming the evil Brits with our law and slavery and racism - and then lets see who, if anyone, pays up.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 59
I know when KP was refurbished for Will & Kate, much was made if the fact that Kate has 2 kitchens. A normal family one and a catering one, when they hold receptions etc at their apartment.
could be the same at Anmer



Yes I’ve heard this. There’s a photo somewhere where she looks very like one of the sons.



Georgiana Cavendish Duchess of Devonshire, is a Spencer relation, Diana actually was like her not just in looks but personality too. Georgiana had an equally glittering but sad life.

That article in the Irish Independent is one of the most racist anti-semetic pieces I’ve read by a journalist. Quite

Ireland held its own Pogrom, Gerry Adams (Sinn Fain) grandfather took part. It's a dark part of history that people try to wipe over.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 10
"Honesty and integrity"? What would she know about either?

I actually got really upset talking to a friend about this earlier this evening. If Thomas Markle has to take a transatlantic flight in his state of health and be confronted by his own daughter in court, who knows what the effect on his weak heart may be. She might end up with blood on her hands.
Maybe he will be allowed to vidéo link from a local courthouse in the US.

Morning Ladies it was Mrs Aunties Birthday yesterday and Gin might have been taken so be gentle.

I am a little surprised that my old friend Mark Stephens has been spouting excitedly about this matter. Mark, the media's goto Entertainment Lawyer (because, well, he looks like one) has lost his touch recently. He was involved in another, in many ways, comparable horlicks with that British diver described by the lovely Elon Musk as a "pweirdo guy". I dont know what pweirdo Guy got up to in Thailand, but god did he ever get fucked over. Frankly he would have had a good case here - just not, alas, in Elon's Home State. American jurisdictions are so sophisticated.

There was a lesson in that case, now what was it? Ah yes, thats it: dont sue billionairres because you think they'll pay you off, because if there is anything at all legally wrong with your case they will leave you humiliated and penniless; and they dont give a duck what you or anyone else thinks about them, or how much it costs them. Its a matter of survival for their wealth and sometimes they just do it for shits and giggles.

Anyway the bottom line, in what is a delicious Judgment (one for the connoisseur of the slowly inserted eviscerating tool), is that Skidmarks Boys (I guess shes the type who cant stand actual powerful legal women) tried to make the case about the "values" of the Daily Mail. For some bizarre reason, betting the courts would allow themselves (in the narrow, nerdy and specialised fields of Privacy Intrusion and Copyright) to be turned into a second Leverson enquiry. I can imagine the excited scenes in some boardroom full of tit Art and biscuits (with Harry in a corner wondering if theyre at the Accountants again) whilst Megs is sold the dream of becoming the peoples champion against the evil press who killed the woman she has been necro-stalking. Oh dear....very very big mistake.

So the Claim says that the Mail acquired her letter and published parts of it misleadingly in breach of her copyright and privacy, not as a newspaper releasing information in the public interest but BECAUSE: (a) they were engaged in a Campaign to destroy or damage her (for some unspecified reason "Is it becoz I is black?"); (b) in pursuit of which they had deliberately "stirred up" the problem between her and Daddy in the first place; and (c) they had acted throughout dishonestly and maliciously.

The lawyers seem to have forgotten (or more likely they just thought it would be a smash and grab as Skids was at the time beloved by us grateful peasants as a touch of Holywood hooker glamour in our mud stained lives) that its not good enough simply to claim things, you also have to indicate what evidence or legal arguments you might be going to rely on to prove them or what are the defendants supposed to be defending? You cant disprove a general allegation that you're a bit of a bleep - you need specific, teapot throwing bridesmaid humiliating, detail.

The response of Megatrons lawyers to having this pointed out to them before it got to the Application was a small masterpiece of deluded snotty arrogance and clearly got up the Judges nose as he takes Sherbourne to the woodshed. Ruling unappeallably, that in respect of all 3 arguments set out above they had either failed to make out proper legal claims; or failed to indicate just what facts and matters they claimed demonstrated them; and crucially that these mistakes were so fundamental that they couldnt be put right by simply amending the Claim and must be struck out. Elementary legal errors in the Skegness County Court.

Now the Mail still have the basic problem of explaining why publishing Megs's weirdo Magna Carta wasnt actionable of itself. On its face its a private document and no-one else is mad enough to (admit to) having written it BUT without all these aggravating factors its not actually worth that much in damages and anyway it had already been released by the 5 stooges; and crucially Daddy to whom it was sent (and could thus waive any confidentiality or copyright of Megans and have it published) had co-operated with the article and thus it was not a breach of her rights.

The judge has said, as they do after theyve left you bleeding to death, that you can always staunch the wounds (difficult if its your head theyve lopped off) put your case properly and have another go - but the question is can she? You need brains, grit and money not built in kneepads to win against utter bastards.

Have a nice day Im off out with the dog..... what I think she's fucked. Her lawyers wil have known after the hearing (when he gave them such a hard time and said theyd have judgment the legal equivalent of straight away) that they'd gone down with all hands; and in the circumstances their response is feeble. I imagine theyve spent the intervening 7 days preparing the client "No dont get your hopes too high we always said this was a uniquely difficult case.... The judges family owned sugar plantations.... Hows loveable scamp Harry?"

My bet is she will at some suitable point in the news cycle discontinue blaming the evil Brits with our law and slavery and racism - and then lets see who, if anyone, pays up.
Thank you Aunty Legal, that was a great explanation.
And Happy Birthday 🥳 🎂 🥂 🍾 for yesterday.

i do however have a supplementary question.
If Meghan is landed with loads of costs and she has no way of paying; ie neither Princes Charles nor Harry pick up the tab; can she be declared bankrupt? Jailed?
Be extradited from the US to be jailed in the UK.

Part of me thinks that she will keep on with the legal process if she knows someone else is going to pick up the tab. She must be loving the attention, even if it’s negative.

There is a new photo of Charlotte. It appears to be in the style of the portraits of the holocaust survivors Kate did earlier this year. Unusual lighting; not a classic royal portrait, but interesting.
Kate is getting into her stride as a photographer
62E36A71-F69E-414C-BD32-0EEAB0E52F1C.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
Morning Ladies it was Mrs Aunties Birthday yesterday and Gin might have been taken so be gentle.

I am a little surprised that my old friend Mark Stephens has been spouting excitedly about this matter. Mark, the media's goto Entertainment Lawyer (because, well, he looks like one) has lost his touch recently. He was involved in another, in many ways, comparable horlicks with that British diver described by the lovely Elon Musk as a "pweirdo guy". I dont know what pweirdo Guy got up to in Thailand, but god did he ever get fucked over. Frankly he would have had a good case here - just not, alas, in Elon's Home State. American jurisdictions are so sophisticated.

There was a lesson in that case, now what was it? Ah yes, thats it: dont sue billionairres because you think they'll pay you off, because if there is anything at all legally wrong with your case they will leave you humiliated and penniless; and they dont give a duck what you or anyone else thinks about them, or how much it costs them. Its a matter of survival for their wealth and sometimes they just do it for shits and giggles.

Anyway the bottom line, in what is a delicious Judgment (one for the connoisseur of the slowly inserted eviscerating tool), is that Skidmarks Boys (I guess shes the type who cant stand actual powerful legal women) tried to make the case about the "values" of the Daily Mail. For some bizarre reason, betting the courts would allow themselves (in the narrow, nerdy and specialised fields of Privacy Intrusion and Copyright) to be turned into a second Leverson enquiry. I can imagine the excited scenes in some boardroom full of tit Art and biscuits (with Harry in a corner wondering if theyre at the Accountants again) whilst Megs is sold the dream of becoming the peoples champion against the evil press who killed the woman she has been necro-stalking. Oh dear....very very big mistake.

So the Claim says that the Mail acquired her letter and published parts of it misleadingly in breach of her copyright and privacy, not as a newspaper releasing information in the public interest but BECAUSE: (a) they were engaged in a Campaign to destroy or damage her (for some unspecified reason "Is it becoz I is black?"); (b) in pursuit of which they had deliberately "stirred up" the problem between her and Daddy in the first place; and (c) they had acted throughout dishonestly and maliciously.

The lawyers seem to have forgotten (or more likely they just thought it would be a smash and grab as Skids was at the time beloved by us grateful peasants as a touch of Holywood hooker glamour in our mud stained lives) that its not good enough simply to claim things, you also have to indicate what evidence or legal arguments you might be going to rely on to prove them or what are the defendants supposed to be defending? You cant disprove a general allegation that you're a bit of a bleep - you need specific, teapot throwing bridesmaid humiliating, detail.

The response of Megatrons lawyers to having this pointed out to them before it got to the Application was a small masterpiece of deluded snotty arrogance and clearly got up the Judges nose as he takes Sherbourne to the woodshed. Ruling unappeallably, that in respect of all 3 arguments set out above they had either failed to make out proper legal claims; or failed to indicate just what facts and matters they claimed demonstrated them; and crucially that these mistakes were so fundamental that they couldnt be put right by simply amending the Claim and must be struck out. Elementary legal errors in the Skegness County Court.

Now the Mail still have the basic problem of explaining why publishing Megs's weirdo Magna Carta wasnt actionable of itself. On its face its a private document and no-one else is mad enough to (admit to) having written it BUT without all these aggravating factors its not actually worth that much in damages and anyway it had already been released by the 5 stooges; and crucially Daddy to whom it was sent (and could thus waive any confidentiality or copyright of Megans and have it published) had co-operated with the article and thus it was not a breach of her rights.

The judge has said, as they do after theyve left you bleeding to death, that you can always staunch the wounds (difficult if its your head theyve lopped off) put your case properly and have another go - but the question is can she? You need brains, grit and money not built in kneepads to win against utter bastards.

Have a nice day Im off out with the dog..... what I think she's fucked. Her lawyers wil have known after the hearing (when he gave them such a hard time and said theyd have judgment the legal equivalent of straight away) that they'd gone down with all hands; and in the circumstances their response is feeble. I imagine theyve spent the intervening 7 days preparing the client "No dont get your hopes too high we always said this was a uniquely difficult case.... The judges family owned sugar plantations.... Hows loveable scamp Harry?"

My bet is she will at some suitable point in the news cycle discontinue blaming the evil Brits with our law and slavery and racism - and then lets see who, if anyone, pays up.
Thank you anti for deciphering that & Happy Birthday🎂 hope you had a great day x
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Morning Ladies it was Mrs Aunties Birthday yesterday and Gin might have been taken so be gentle.

I am a little surprised that my old friend Mark Stephens has been spouting excitedly about this matter. Mark, the media's goto Entertainment Lawyer (because, well, he looks like one) has lost his touch recently. He was involved in another, in many ways, comparable horlicks with that British diver described by the lovely Elon Musk as a "pweirdo guy". I dont know what pweirdo Guy got up to in Thailand, but god did he ever get fucked over. Frankly he would have had a good case here - just not, alas, in Elon's Home State. American jurisdictions are so sophisticated.

There was a lesson in that case, now what was it? Ah yes, thats it: dont sue billionairres because you think they'll pay you off, because if there is anything at all legally wrong with your case they will leave you humiliated and penniless; and they dont give a duck what you or anyone else thinks about them, or how much it costs them. Its a matter of survival for their wealth and sometimes they just do it for shits and giggles.

Anyway the bottom line, in what is a delicious Judgment (one for the connoisseur of the slowly inserted eviscerating tool), is that Skidmarks Boys (I guess shes the type who cant stand actual powerful legal women) tried to make the case about the "values" of the Daily Mail. For some bizarre reason, betting the courts would allow themselves (in the narrow, nerdy and specialised fields of Privacy Intrusion and Copyright) to be turned into a second Leverson enquiry. I can imagine the excited scenes in some boardroom full of tit Art and biscuits (with Harry in a corner wondering if theyre at the Accountants again) whilst Megs is sold the dream of becoming the peoples champion against the evil press who killed the woman she has been necro-stalking. Oh dear....very very big mistake.

So the Claim says that the Mail acquired her letter and published parts of it misleadingly in breach of her copyright and privacy, not as a newspaper releasing information in the public interest but BECAUSE: (a) they were engaged in a Campaign to destroy or damage her (for some unspecified reason "Is it becoz I is black?"); (b) in pursuit of which they had deliberately "stirred up" the problem between her and Daddy in the first place; and (c) they had acted throughout dishonestly and maliciously.

The lawyers seem to have forgotten (or more likely they just thought it would be a smash and grab as Skids was at the time beloved by us grateful peasants as a touch of Holywood hooker glamour in our mud stained lives) that its not good enough simply to claim things, you also have to indicate what evidence or legal arguments you might be going to rely on to prove them or what are the defendants supposed to be defending? You cant disprove a general allegation that you're a bit of a bleep - you need specific, teapot throwing bridesmaid humiliating, detail.

The response of Megatrons lawyers to having this pointed out to them before it got to the Application was a small masterpiece of deluded snotty arrogance and clearly got up the Judges nose as he takes Sherbourne to the woodshed. Ruling unappeallably, that in respect of all 3 arguments set out above they had either failed to make out proper legal claims; or failed to indicate just what facts and matters they claimed demonstrated them; and crucially that these mistakes were so fundamental that they couldnt be put right by simply amending the Claim and must be struck out. Elementary legal errors in the Skegness County Court.

Now the Mail still have the basic problem of explaining why publishing Megs's weirdo Magna Carta wasnt actionable of itself. On its face its a private document and no-one else is mad enough to (admit to) having written it BUT without all these aggravating factors its not actually worth that much in damages and anyway it had already been released by the 5 stooges; and crucially Daddy to whom it was sent (and could thus waive any confidentiality or copyright of Megans and have it published) had co-operated with the article and thus it was not a breach of her rights.

The judge has said, as they do after theyve left you bleeding to death, that you can always staunch the wounds (difficult if its your head theyve lopped off) put your case properly and have another go - but the question is can she? You need brains, grit and money not built in kneepads to win against utter bastards.

Have a nice day Im off out with the dog..... what I think she's fucked. Her lawyers wil have known after the hearing (when he gave them such a hard time and said theyd have judgment the legal equivalent of straight away) that they'd gone down with all hands; and in the circumstances their response is feeble. I imagine theyve spent the intervening 7 days preparing the client "No dont get your hopes too high we always said this was a uniquely difficult case.... The judges family owned sugar plantations.... Hows loveable scamp Harry?"

My bet is she will at some suitable point in the news cycle discontinue blaming the evil Brits with our law and slavery and racism - and then lets see who, if anyone, pays up.
Amazingly eloquent, as expected, and belated happy birthday to you. Thanks for your learned insight. Y’all have a great day now ya hear 🐶🚶‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
Thanks my dear. On the question of her liability quickly: you cant be imprisoned for debt or transported to Australia. It is possible to enforce UK money judgments in the USA but it can easily be made very difficult. I suspect the only asset she has here is half of Frogmore cottage though god knows how thats structured. We shall see. Its a vale of tears and god she deserves it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
20200502_103324.jpg


Thanks my dear. On the question of her liability quickly: you cant be imprisoned for debt or transported to Australia. It is possible to enforce UK money judgments in the USA but it can easily be made very difficult. I suspect the only asset she has here is half of Frogmore cottage though god knows how thats structured. We shall see. Its a vale of tears and god she deserves it.
Happy belated birthday to you! Thank you so much for your posts and explanations!
Enjoy your walk!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 14
Morning Ladies it was Mrs Aunties Birthday yesterday and Gin might have been taken so be gentle.

I am a little surprised that my old friend Mark Stephens has been spouting excitedly about this matter. Mark, the media's goto Entertainment Lawyer (because, well, he looks like one) has lost his touch recently. He was involved in another, in many ways, comparable horlicks with that British diver described by the lovely Elon Musk as a "pweirdo guy". I dont know what pweirdo Guy got up to in Thailand, but god did he ever get fucked over. Frankly he would have had a good case here - just not, alas, in Elon's Home State. American jurisdictions are so sophisticated.

There was a lesson in that case, now what was it? Ah yes, thats it: dont sue billionairres because you think they'll pay you off, because if there is anything at all legally wrong with your case they will leave you humiliated and penniless; and they dont give a duck what you or anyone else thinks about them, or how much it costs them. Its a matter of survival for their wealth and sometimes they just do it for shits and giggles.

Anyway the bottom line, in what is a delicious Judgment (one for the connoisseur of the slowly inserted eviscerating tool), is that Skidmarks Boys (I guess shes the type who cant stand actual powerful legal women) tried to make the case about the "values" of the Daily Mail. For some bizarre reason, betting the courts would allow themselves (in the narrow, nerdy and specialised fields of Privacy Intrusion and Copyright) to be turned into a second Leverson enquiry. I can imagine the excited scenes in some boardroom full of tit Art and biscuits (with Harry in a corner wondering if theyre at the Accountants again) whilst Megs is sold the dream of becoming the peoples champion against the evil press who killed the woman she has been necro-stalking. Oh dear....very very big mistake.

So the Claim says that the Mail acquired her letter and published parts of it misleadingly in breach of her copyright and privacy, not as a newspaper releasing information in the public interest but BECAUSE: (a) they were engaged in a Campaign to destroy or damage her (for some unspecified reason "Is it becoz I is black?"); (b) in pursuit of which they had deliberately "stirred up" the problem between her and Daddy in the first place; and (c) they had acted throughout dishonestly and maliciously.

The lawyers seem to have forgotten (or more likely they just thought it would be a smash and grab as Skids was at the time beloved by us grateful peasants as a touch of Holywood hooker glamour in our mud stained lives) that its not good enough simply to claim things, you also have to indicate what evidence or legal arguments you might be going to rely on to prove them or what are the defendants supposed to be defending? You cant disprove a general allegation that you're a bit of a bleep - you need specific, teapot throwing bridesmaid humiliating, detail.

The response of Megatrons lawyers to having this pointed out to them before it got to the Application was a small masterpiece of deluded snotty arrogance and clearly got up the Judges nose as he takes Sherbourne to the woodshed. Ruling unappeallably, that in respect of all 3 arguments set out above they had either failed to make out proper legal claims; or failed to indicate just what facts and matters they claimed demonstrated them; and crucially that these mistakes were so fundamental that they couldnt be put right by simply amending the Claim and must be struck out. Elementary legal errors in the Skegness County Court.

Now the Mail still have the basic problem of explaining why publishing Megs's weirdo Magna Carta wasnt actionable of itself. On its face its a private document and no-one else is mad enough to (admit to) having written it BUT without all these aggravating factors its not actually worth that much in damages and anyway it had already been released by the 5 stooges; and crucially Daddy to whom it was sent (and could thus waive any confidentiality or copyright of Megans and have it published) had co-operated with the article and thus it was not a breach of her rights.

The judge has said, as they do after theyve left you bleeding to death, that you can always staunch the wounds (difficult if its your head theyve lopped off) put your case properly and have another go - but the question is can she? You need brains, grit and money not built in kneepads to win against utter bastards.

Have a nice day Im off out with the dog..... what I think she's fucked. Her lawyers wil have known after the hearing (when he gave them such a hard time and said theyd have judgment the legal equivalent of straight away) that they'd gone down with all hands; and in the circumstances their response is feeble. I imagine theyve spent the intervening 7 days preparing the client "No dont get your hopes too high we always said this was a uniquely difficult case.... The judges family owned sugar plantations.... Hows loveable scamp Harry?"

My bet is she will at some suitable point in the news cycle discontinue blaming the evil Brits with our law and slavery and racism - and then lets see who, if anyone, pays up.
Happy Birthday for yesterday! And thank you for explaining, I made myself a cup of tea to read this!! (Too early for gin, sadly...😁)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 15
Thanks my dear. On the question of her liability quickly: you cant be imprisoned for debt or transported to Australia. It is possible to enforce UK money judgments in the USA but it can easily be made very difficult. I suspect the only asset she has here is half of Frogmore cottage though god knows how thats structured. We shall see. Its a vale of tears and god she deserves it.
Thank you! ( I don’t think the Aussies would want that Sheila!)
Frogmore belongs to HM, so she has no assets.
Hope no one pays her bills for her, so she never returns to the UK.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 14
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.