Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Evangelina

VIP Member
Plenty of other little digs at the Cambridges in the DM today.

A story suggesting that PW's horse he rode yesterday was drugged.

Presumably placed to counteract any re-emerging stories about Hazza's alleged past mistreatment of his polo ponies.....See, William is just as bad......

Another story about parents at the Cambridge kids' school complaining about the RPOs blocking the pavements with their cars on the school run.

Focus on security and a sense of entitlement. Getting ahead of any media stories about the Harkles' security demands and behaviour this week.....See, the Cambridges behave the same.....

Brace yourself because it'll probably get even worse this week.
Tina Brown is the founder and CEO of Daily Beast:
Marie Claire:
Cambridges have no charisma (Brown) only their kids and Harkles.

Perspective on the William horse part:
Everyone believed that Andrew needed riding lessons (for Trooping)DM
Everyone believes that Andrew rides to control the Queen.

With time this will also be repeated,depending on narratives and ''human interest.''

"But, but the comments are refuting it.''
They will disapear, only the article will stay.

Minor evidence:
This is also the front of the ''we do bad things to bad people cap"
Confirmed in article (this is one of those, can't remember where but I'm sure posts,so inserting source like for the Kate ass slap)
:
Watch the comments?
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 17

Starburst_87

Well-known member
Go to archive.ph, paste the url of the article and hit the save button. It will then produce an archive.ph url which will link to the article. You can then paste the link here.
Quick question. Would hitting the save button on your computer and then hitting the "save as single file" tab work also? Just curious because I accidentally did that one time and it showed up as the actual webpage but with a different url that showed as saved to my desktop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16

Evangelina

VIP Member
Latest Lady C plunging right in.

Smeg reaching out to Thomas? Lady C did not wish her participation in Thomas Markle's visit to be made public but believes Karl Larsen leaked details to The Mirror. Karl Larsen still photographs the Harkles at polo and has betrayed Thomas. He has also promoted the idea of Smeg's camp wishing to reconcile with Thomas. Trying to improve Smeg's image prior to arriving in UK for Jubbly. Total lie.

Haz and PW healing rift? Leaked to The Mirror from the Harkle's camp. Smeg is setting up a situation where the Cambridges and the rest of the royals will be forced to be pleasant to them. Duping the public as to the reality of the situation.

Uvalde visit being promoted as an official visit? The Royal Family Channel on youtube have given this impression. The reality is that it was insensitive and intrusive and not endorsed by TRF. All the signs are there that Smeg employed a team to film her and they hold the copyright. Smeg entitled with no empathy-exploiting tragedy to advance the agenda that she is compassionate and a great humanitarian. What did Haz think of visit? He was offended that hıs mother was being mourned by people who didn't know her. Haz did not want Smeg to go but she needed to do it for good PR. (Thomas's stroke and Jubbly coolness were not making her look good). Not right morally or ethically but PR-wise yes. Many people will have bought the narrative lie.

Palace press office inept?
Keeping the Harkles on the royal website gives them credability. They have not been taken off the official website mainly because TQ and PC are hoping to reincorporate the Harkles back into fold. TRF understand that some criticism is inevitable and they are trying to ride out the storm.

Fundamental error of judgement by TRF? TQ places family duty/loyalty high. Harkles are both troubled/disordered individuals with odious conduct.
Past manipulators in TRF were the Queen Mother and Diana but they were different to Smeg. Queen Mother revered royalty. Diana was pro-royal even though she caused damage to PC. Both were subservient to the monarchy. Smeg views herself as superior to the monarchy. Lady C not sure TRF appreciates this key difference.

Harkle's commercial failure? They are a tainted brand. Likelihood of an unwilling but financially necessary return? İn the US they can make more money (in theory) and can indulge their elitist principles.
So she seems to read here.
Fully bolded part:
Due to actions of certain groups 2 other places that she visited have flown under the radar, highly likely even Netflix.
Appearance of memorial visit in Netflix docu, would now count as irrelevant public domain information , yet in reality is a successful promotion of Meg.
Including the methods which she needed to get the entrance.
Places at which she could've gotten material that she wanted without the nonsense which created the forest&trees problem.
It was possible that Haz makes a phone call and Meg gets a ''sweet nod from the Biden's.''
What then?
Harry wasn't there due to aftermath of ''bonkers constitution.''
Just showing his face, would've remained the media and certain groups what he said, and ruined a approved and sanctioned papwalk (not by BRF) completely .
Archewell presence is a strong indicator that expenses were ''perceived'' as ''charity .''

The mourning of Diana is not comparable to this situation , and Harry wouldn't understand it that way.(He reflected back then on the mass hysteria which people sometimes engange in when a celebrity dies) the complex ''bond'' of fandom.
End of comment on fully bolded part.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 16

knoddle

VIP Member
Oh Carpediem69, can you imagine Smeagol in this outfit? Chita, please please create this image?

1653832861433.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 16

Pennypennypenny

VIP Member
Thank you Carpe and Doodlebug 🥰
I don't think the Harkle invite has anything to do with the Queen's Christianity, soft spot for Noballs, family unity or the beating heart of the Monarchy. It's pragmatism and containment. I bet the whole RF including the Queen loathe the Snarkles, who have no right to be at the Jubilee and are a pair of disgusting clowns.

Both sides know the issue of the children has to be addressed. Limited Snarkle appearances, arrangements vague, aides kept at arms length. W&C and Anne absent, this will be dealt with by PC. The much loved family members spiel, soft spot for Noballs, is a cover as this is not about reconciliation, quite the opposite.

If the Snarkles had merely bought shame on the RF as in history, dealing with it would be simple. The problem here is that there exist no legitimate royal children, but the RF have confirmed they exist without any proof. Surrogate babies are not legitimately eligible to be in the LoS, but these two are, and however far down is not the point. Whatever your beliefs about the children, these facts are beyond doubt. The press embargo on this comes from BP who facilitated the fraud through fear of racism accusations and protected the Snarkles. Now they have to extricate themselves.

News reports say the Snarkles will spend time privately with the family. I think they will stay somewhere secret not Frogmore and there will be confirmation of sorts that senior Royals have met the Flatpacks. They won't risk a christening. This is a crazy situation, but the bottom line is that the RF must know there are no royal children.

The RF hoped it would go away, but because these blood-suckers have failed in all their ventures they're back leeching and whining. The Stoat and Ho need to nail down their Royal credentials before they go under, and the only way they can do this is through establishing a baby connection via senior Royals. This is what they must do, and what they've been holding out for.

If they don't come to the UK they're only delaying the inevitable. More and more questions are being asked and the risk of exposure is increasing thanks to SM and YW and Sue Smith etc.

Soros or whoever might be backing them may have big money, but it's the royal titles and kudos that money can't buy that they want.
[/QUOT
She appears to have quite aggressive body language here. Is she haranguing the person stood on front of her?
Why have they used surrogates? I don’t get it unless she can’t have children
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16

Palpatine

VIP Member
Am I reading this wrong or did Orca pimp out her private jet for 666 to go and ghoul over the tragic shootings in Texas?
Probably not. I just mentioned that Orca owns the exact same type of aircraft. This one looks like it’s owned by a private charter company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16

Orangeinessex

VIP Member
It's about the usage of ones children for... image polish.
Hard evidence exist.
It would force William to react-take sides.
It would put William in a position of defending actions which are heavily criticized in the media.
It would create immense media exposure of RF's press tactics , papwalks, leaks.
Any attack on Camilla , would destroy Charles .
The ''nonnegotiable mistress ''above the minor, motherless children.

Have in mind, this is the smallest thing I'm coming up.
They are family , it could only get worse.
Associations, business relations ...The internal things which shouldn't be in the open. Cover up's of misbehavior ...

Harry isn't powerful , the media which knows everything that I told you above can make him (if it fits, they chose so) incredibly powerful .
And then he becomes a even bigger problem.


"Hard evidence exist."

Hard evidence of what ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 16

Evangelina

VIP Member
Minor confirmation of:

Relevant the security part, the chances now of figuring out :
who got accreditation (many sub-studios, in name unrelated)
who could possibly be contracted on one time basis.
Which places they will film(charities) (which will be shown in the Netflix thing) are about zero until aired.

Example the Avivo Group is Charles wind farms, Queens insurance (trusts) and the facility owner of the Surrey (Netflix studio.)
They may not film the Jubilee ''events'' but...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15