Harry and Meghan #161 Was the 16 bath Mansion ever their home? Are they together or living alone?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Dont you bleeping cunting arseing dare @Nuttynana

But if you do, I'm opening a book to see how long it lasts, place your bets now everybody!
You are right I just called old Victor Meldrew a Cupid stunt (that's Hubby he gets more like him every day), complaining about the Postman walking across his bleeping decking!!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 35
From today's Guardian .........

The Mail on Sunday will pay the Duchess of Sussex just £1 in damages for invading her privacy by publishing a private letter she had sent to her father.
The nominal sum is set out in court documents that also formally confirm that the newspaper – and its sister website MailOnline – has accepted defeat and will not be taking the long-running case to a supreme court appeal.

The outlet will also pay an unspecified sum for the separate case of infringing Meghan’s copyright by publishing large chunks of the letter.
Mark Stephens, a media lawyer, suggested that the nominal settlement for the privacy aspect suggested a weakness in that aspect of Meghan’s case: “Normally for that kind of invasion of privacy you would expect £75,000 to £125,000. It does show that the curation of her reputation was an area where she had effectively invaded her own privacy.”
The newspaper’s publisher has also agreed to pay a confidential sum in damages for copyright infringement. The Mail on Sunday also faces having to cover a substantial part of Meghan’s legal costs, which could be more than £1m.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...personal-risks-mail-on-sunday-privacy-victory
The duchess had always said that her three-year legal battle against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and sister website MailOnline, was more about principles than money.
I’m gutted that they’re not taking it further. Presumably their lawyers felt it was no longer worth it.

But £1 in damages 😂😂😂😂😂 That has made my day!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 51
Is there any way you can take bigger photos of this, so I can add them to the gallery. These distort when zoomed in. Thanks.
Hey. Hope these are better? If I need to be doing something another way, holler. I operate on scatnav, most time.

Thank you for your hard work, with all too.

Screenshot_20220105-121005_Readly.jpg
Screenshot_20220105-121014_Readly.jpg

Screenshot_20220105-121047_Readly.jpg

Screenshot_20220105-121057_Readly.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 40
Say it ain't so! If you clean up your potty mouth, what will Fuckers like me do? I've been swearing my whole life, and can't see me cleaning things up now. I will try if must be, but I don't see the point. Can we still call the cunts cunts?
Who suggested a verbal clean up?Ive gone back for a look and I can't see it? Why should we?

Dunno whose idea it was, but they can shut up or duck off, in my view
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 38
I’m gutted that they’re not taking it further. Presumably their lawyers felt it was no longer worth it.

But £1 in damages 😂😂😂😂😂 That has made my day!
:ROFLMAO:

Reminds me of Hazza vs the MoS and the Judge only gave him £2,500 in costs instead of the £35,000 he was after :)


And the reply to Angela's tweet :ROFLMAO:

Screen Shot 2022-01-05 at 12.26.06.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 49
Say it ain't so! If you clean up your potty mouth, what will Fuckers like me do? I've been swearing my whole life, and can't see me cleaning things up now. I will try if must be, but I don't see the point. Can we still call the cunts cunts?
Let it go VB we are partners in crime and I only asked because some people are very prissy.

The cunts of Cuntdom can be used whenever we want to.

Bastard, bollickiing, bullshitting, bumholes of bumble!!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36
Who suggested a verbal clean up?Ive gone back for a look and I can't see it? Why should we?

Dunno whose idea it was, but they can shut up or duck off, in my view
It was @Nuttynana herself.
She clearly had a moment (or a nana-second) of doubt.
Hopefully she has recovered from her short lapse.

There is nothing better than reading a Nuttynana diatribe full of swearwords we know and love, plus some new ones that we are happy to learn after being subjected to a load of wordsalad and Archehole publicity nonsense.

I think Nana should get an Honour for services to swearing, making us all laugh and bringing much needed humour to the Meghan and Harry shitshow.
 
  • Heart
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 40
Even if the other part (copyright) is a few £100grand. The most amusing thing is that Scobie and the Sussex Squad all boasted about how she would be getting "substantial damages" and all went on about how she was going to be taking millions of dollars from MOL. Think again, morons! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
I wonder if they did a deal with her, we will pay 'X' amount (a lot less than expected) and MOS agree not to take it to the supreme court, probably a lot more of her 'un-truths' would have been exposed and would have heaped more embarassment and ridicule on her. Even the front page acknowledgement was so weak and unapologetic, I would imagine if she wasn't scared of more negative exposure, that apology would never have been acceptable to her.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 27
She perjured herself left, right and centre and nary a word. I don't like that.

The single pound in damages I'm over the moon about. The whole shebang will have caused her/them untold stress over the last couple of years and for that I am truly grateful. It is a payback of sorts.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 37
It was @Nuttynana herself.
She clearly had a moment (or a nana-second) of doubt.
Hopefully she has recovered from her short lapse.

There is nothing better than reading a Nuttynana diatribe full of swearwords we know and love, plus some new ones that we are happy to learn after being subjected to a load of wordsalad and Archehole publicity nonsense.

I think Nana should get an Honour for services to swearing, making us all laugh and bringing much needed humour to the Meghan and Harry shitshow.
Ah. Thanks @Chita. I agree, she needs an honour for services to swearing.

Plus – 'nanasecond' :ROFLMAO: Take a bow
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 26
She perjured herself left, right and centre and nary a word. I don't like that.

The single pound in damages I'm over the moon about. The whole shebang will have caused her/them untold stress over the last couple of years and for that I am truly grateful. It is a payback of sorts.
Just console yourself that people who had previously thought the royal family were being horrible to a fine, upstanding, naive and innocent young woman have now seen that she tells lies and deliberately manipulates words to create a false idea of herself.

In other words a whole load of people around the world have also seen her true self.


Thats a victory. Money doesn't matter.

Her reputation has been damaged by her own hand.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 43
Thousands of people do porn. If they tried to bury or deny this then it is OK to call them out. If not then it is just part of her past.

Even more people have topless beach pictures. Nothing at all wrong with them. I don't think dragging this up is very nice.
I agree regarding the obvious pics that are from her acting days and holiday snaps. Not sure I agree with you regarding real porn though because most people don't do that 😃
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 39
It was @Nuttynana herself.
She clearly had a moment (or a nana-second) of doubt.
Hopefully she has recovered from her short lapse.

There is nothing better than reading a Nuttynana diatribe full of swearwords we know and love, plus some new ones that we are happy to learn after being subjected to a load of wordsalad and Archehole publicity nonsense.

I think Nana should get an Honour for services to swearing, making us all laugh and bringing much needed humour to the Meghan and Harry shitshow.
Thanks Chita❤❤ it was only that we have lots of new users and did want to offend delicate ears.

Your support means I can bleeping well carry on Cussing the cuntholes of Cali and bollocks to them!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
Just watching Princes at the Palace on Netflix and the interview clip is shown from when Harry was in Afghanistan


“I’m not going to sit here and whinge, everyone knows about Twitter and the internet and stuff like that.”
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 22
I am wondering if you all think I should give up swearing on the thread and use Cockney eloquence instead as wondering if my foul mouth offends some of you!!

It would be bleeping difficult for me but just need to know especially as we have several new users here.

Bollocks to the Gringers if this is my last swear word!!
I swear, but cannot bring myself to say some words in print, so I rely on you to take up the slack. You do it so well.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.