Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

freda19

VIP Member
Thanks to @Chita for the thread title.


We don't like the 6s or Prince Andrew
We don't like that HMQ gave a knighthood to Tony Blair (spit).
We liked the Cambridges NYE photo.

We discussed the 6s selling their mansion and where they will move to now.
A going to school.
L made them a family complete with a massively photoshopped Christmas card.
Their charity that only earnt 50k in donations and they spent more winding up Sussex Royal on legal fees (where's the money?)
The 6s diaries are being kept clear to assist with the Jubilee if requested - although the 6s also have a prior engagement with the invictus games around the same time so could be double booked - oh dear.

We discussed Charles essay - or more specifically that he was proud of H's work on the environment.

We also discussed Neil Sean's video speculating that the 6s are house hunting for a secondary home in the UK.

We also discussed facilities provided for the homeless and living in shipping containers.

Thanks to @JAR21 for all the work on the Wiki - please screencap any tweets you post as they can still be added to the wiki even if the tweet is deleted.

Please vote in the grifties (I think it's still going).
Thanks to all our contributors who post pictures, songs and summaries of long YouTube videos - you are all stars and we appreciate all of you.

Please add anything I've forgotten below.

Link to the previous thread

Well done Fred. You are just so
so
so organised. You and Jar are wondrous. Memory like a heffalump too. And well done Chita (y)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

VC10

VIP Member
😀😀😀 This Des O'connor CD is great value at 99p 😀😀😎 she can save the change in her little purse 😀
B00009V8X8.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Miscanthus

VIP Member
Yoko Ono still lives at The Dakota and owns an entire floor. I can just see MM trying to cozy up to Yoko to get her to rent some of the apartments to her and Harry under the "We're both persecuted minorities" narrative. Oh, yes, indeedy, I would LOVE to see them get the big freeze from Ono. PLEASE LET IT HAPPEN!!!

Didn't Madonna apply to buy in there and was rejected? Apologies if this topic has already been covered.
If you want to rent / buy in any of these New York condos you have to go in front of a residents' committee (sorry Brit here, don't know the tech terms) and answer a load of questions. I can't believe they would be accepted anywhere.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

recollectionsmayvary

Well-known member
You've got this. Kick it's arse.
I considered giving up my wee job because some lots of days are tough, but it's only 3 hours in the morning and it's MY money to spend as I please. So, no way Pedro. Even long covid must have a point when it gives up and buggers off.
Yeah, we've got this bubba.

View attachment 972708
My thoughts are with those of you with Long C. I lost my hair several times after a long ICU stay.... Follow me for tips & recipes! Seriously I understand long recovery so... ask away BC a small thing like that affects your hair and your house pipes for years sometimes. Not to mention the physical recovery and all that involves. It's a long exhausting road...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 37

VioletButterfly

VIP Member
I am wondering if you all think I should give up swearing on the thread and use Cockney eloquence instead as wondering if my foul mouth offends some of you!!

It would be fucking difficult for me but just need to know especially as we have several new users here.

Bollocks to the Gringers if this is my last swear word!!
Say it ain't so! If you clean up your potty mouth, what will Fuckers like me do? I've been swearing my whole life, and can't see me cleaning things up now. I will try if must be, but I don't see the point. Can we still call the cunts cunts?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Silbee

VIP Member
She perjured herself left, right and centre and nary a word. I don't like that.

The single pound in damages I'm over the moon about. The whole shebang will have caused her/them untold stress over the last couple of years and for that I am truly grateful. It is a payback of sorts.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 37

Chita

VIP Member
Oh Hi Hi Hi. Yes I want to know who she is as well. I just followed you over there. (Kates Finger is me) I'm not there for the politics, just to give a big FU to Meghan. I love Ladybird518
Off Topic kinda: I've been trying forever to find a good avi. I find one, them I worry I may have usurped someones style here, so I keep moving on. I do think I finally found one (made one) fitting for my dislike of Meghan. She's american so I changed the finger Kate had out. In England, I believe the middle finger out means nothing. But in the good ole USA, the middle finger extended is a big fat Fuck You. Love how it's right next to Harry's All Time Blunder Diana's ring, that was his, but he gave it to Will for Kate.
Oh how Meg must hate that. But, it's a glimpse into the personality of the Ginger twunt b4 Meghan. That was a kind, loving, generous thing to do. (Let's not say in the back of his mind Kate was taking the Ring from him, ergo he was marrying her, but I'm no shrink) Maybe, when the china shards settle, and the marriage farce is over, that kind generous loving Harry will return.
In the Meantime, I imagine the blurred images, except for The Ring, to be a very subtle dig at Meghan. Lets face it, when Meg saw that pic, the ring is all she had to see And is there the slightest hint of a smirk not in Kate's mouth, but in her eyes. I think the ring pic was the magic bullet. God I hope so. Have we heard from L.A. yet today? I think this is the one they should hang in the museum. But that's just me. Harry and Meghan need to fuck off. This pick tells me, Kate and all she stands for, is flipping the harpy the bird.
View attachment 977001

I noticed the ring looking clear but I had not noticed that middle finger!!!!

OMG now Im thinking of the Meghan and Harry card that showed Meghan's finger extended.

Now we have this with the middle finger extended.
Is it deliberate??

OMG!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Cinnamon.girl

VIP Member
What Hazznoballz thought he was getting.....
A wholesome fresh bird, young clean fertile and quick to roast. Oven ready and easy to manage even for a clown. Impress your friends! Versatile dish and satisfaction guaranteed or money back.
30-Day Free Trial Before You Buy !
images (4).jpeg


What Noballs got. ....
Purchased in panic, as Taller and More Powerful Brother had just purchased superior, genuinely Fresh Bird. Bird supplies running out, fresh birds all taken, and Noballs frustrated and eager to experiment with exotic "Green-Breast" dish from Compton.
A past-it half-turkey already foul, sell-by date doctored to make bird appear fresh. Guaranteed to cause upset, trauma and a stink. No money back despite guarantee that bird was fresh and clean.
Once bird was sampled, T & C Applied. No Returns, no Free Trial.
Impossible to bin or dispose of as stench of decay all-pervasive and lingers for years.
The rotten bird is still with us.
images (19).jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 37

mardymare

VIP Member
Latest Lady C now up

Tony Blair Petition. Likelihood of TQ removing knighthood? Evidence of dodgy dossier ordered to be destroyed. Lady C felt he should have been tried for war crimes. TQ could not delay award indefinitely. TB jeopardised his own legacy by cooperating with Bush. TQ had a dilemma as TB was a good PM previously.
Can PC bring back Harkles when TQ dies?
Haz has human rights and allowed to make mistakes if makes amends. Also PC feels responsible as a father. Difficult situation. PC needs to understand what he is dealing with, and action will reflect on him. Can Harkles be reined in? They have been huge flops in reality.
One pound privacy damages? Parallel with author Leon Uris/Exodus case. By agreeing to such derisory damages, Smeg and team have admitted that MOS spoke the truth. Defamatory but not damaging to litigant. MOS have vindicated Thomas Markle and Smeg revealed as manipulative schemer. Objective achieved. No need to appeal to Supreme Court.
Harkles comparison with Windsors? Same fate? Yes Lady C thinks so and also parallels with Prince/Princess Michael - both wives married for what they would gain and shown themselves to be self-serving. Wallis grew to love Duke of Windsor and enjoyed royal life but she didn't set out to be the wife only the mistress. Smeg loves the idea of Haz but does she love him? Destructive behaviour says otherwise. Wallis and Smeg both dominant married to weak men. Wallis overtly dominant/Smeg plays simpering and tungsten together - less honest.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 37

ChipDex

VIP Member
I have more faith in Bower's book now, reading that. We may even get the full story of the dress fitting. It's obvious Bower knows the run-up to the wedding was a horror show.

And sitting patiently waiting for the photos that didn't make the final three to turn up. Especially the dancing one that Paolo mentions. The outtakes will probably be more like the Kate we're used to seeing. Maybe they'll release a few for their wedding anniversary in April.

And adorable that William and the kids chose one.


 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Innocent Hamster

Chatty Member
I have to confess that I like the photos of Catherine. I'd hate to wear that red dress, but I think it works for the pose in the picture.

Yes, she looks slightly different to how we're used to seeing her in papped shots, but I still like them, and I think her hair flowing loose gives them a softness that counter the formal poses.

I also love the fact that the make up looks to be fairly minimal. A lot of the time I find her black eyeliner too heavy.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Scotch Mist

VIP Member
I'm much more interested in where the Harkles have moved to now, and the fact that they've had Netflix cameras following them for a year indicating that a reality show is on the cards 😄

Must say I'm looking forward to seeing Hawwy whip up some waffles for Fark while instructing him about world inequality in vaccine distribution. During which time Fark asks if he's really a Prince because he thought the chickens were his real family.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 37

petalpetunia

Chatty Member
@Chita Thank you for my award. Yes, I am currently enjoying it as my Avi, although I will have to revert to my normal one, as it's too ugly not to use!


Navigating the Wiki and the Gallery:

We have a pink button at the top of each page for the Wiki and I have requested an equivalent for the Gallery, but have not had a response.

From a laptop you can also access both from the blue bar at the top of the screen, labelled Wiki and Media:

View attachment 974017

From a phone, they are in the list accessed from menu via the 3 lines at the top left of your screen.

View attachment 974108

Wiki

When you click on the Wiki button (on a laptop) you will see the initial page, which also lists a guide to what the subsequent pages contain. The videos and glares are on the pages with the red square around.

From your phone you will need to scroll down to see the page descriptions.

View attachment 974023

View attachment 974119

Once you click on that page, you will see the menu for that page listed on the right of the page and the videos will be found there. The ones I have added, I have described to make the content more obvious, rather than just providing the link.

View attachment 974031

View attachment 974040


Gallery/Media

Unless the moderators give us a button, like the Wiki, you will need to access this via the Media tab at the top of the page on a laptop or the 3 lines on a phone.

When you click Media, you will see the following screen:

View attachment 974057


You then need to click on the Harry and Meghan tab on the left and you will see the following:

View attachment 974060

Glares can be found in either Body Language or Videos.


Unfortunately, when you click on Videos, they don't usually show a preview and the screen is shown like this:

View attachment 974065


But I have added a description in the title or the description of each video (shown when you hover over it), to give you an idea of what it is. I did also ask how to add words to tag the Gallery content, which would help with searching, but I haven't had a response to that either.

View attachment 974068

And

View attachment 974071


I hope that has made the Wiki and the Gallery clearer for everyone. If you have any questions, just ask, and I'll try and answer them.

You might want to bookmark this post, and you can then refer to it for instructions if you forget.


You're Bloody brilliant you are ❤ 👏👏👏
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Mrsoh

VIP Member
Well Scooby Doo thought it was a good idea to release FF, he has no credibility when it comes to commenting on anyone else's work.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 37

Nuttynana

VIP Member
Personally I love the photos, I stopped in my tracks when I saw the profile shot on IG, the delicate way the ribbon runs through her hand with the ring so bold against the white. Just beautifully done. However I do understand why some people are not into the style with most people in the general public favouring the current highly saturated and over sharpened trend in celebrity photography right now. This set will sit with and compliment the other Royal portraits back many generations and will need to remain timeless, so a different end goal called for a different style.

I think the thing most people are thrown by is how Catherine looks compared to how we usually see her. It’s rare to get a front facing photo with her looking into the lens, even rarer a beaming front on smile close up. When you only ever see someone in profile suddenly been confronted with a different angle can be jarring. We’ve all seen a similar thing with influences who work their angles on Insta but suddenly look like different people in pictures taken by others at different angles.

Her hair is also set differently which can very much change the appearance of a persons face. In these her usual just off center parting is completely swept back with no part visible at all. This also removes the usual face framing hair making her face shape and forehead appear larger than usual. The use of her natural curls rather than heat set ones can feel a bit 80s like in her recent appearance in the green reworn gown. The 80s are seen as a very dated out of style period right now so I get why people don‘t like them but personally I would never shame a woman for wearing her natural curls. I think its great she‘s starting to embrace them more.

Again totally biased as I already love this type of style but just my take on elements that might be contributing to some peoples negative take. For me the only thing missing was a tiara shot given they’re official portraits to go alongside all the other royals in their gowns and jewels, but I’m hopeful with William‘s 40th also this year that they did a couple shot at the same time in full bling to release at years end 🤞🏻
I love the way the earring and ring are mentioned and accentuated, a good poke at Doxy who must be with her mh specialist today foaming at the mouth and chewing the rug😄😄😄
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 37