LadyMuck
VIP Member
Brilliant Chita! Better than Artemis Goog!
Brilliant Chita! Better than Artemis Goog!
Well the Queen's Birthday public holiday has no relation to tax. The equation would be something along the lines of the number of taxpayers and dollar amount of tax and then what proportion of that tax goes to the royals. Commonwealth countries all (?) have a Queen's birthday public holiday, it's not relevant to the calculation.
The ONLY people in the UK who are paid for a day's holiday celebrating the Queen's birthday are civil servants. No one else is. The Civil Service is paid by the taxpayer. Our wages come out of the taxes. So if we are paid to celebrate the Queens birthday and that money comes out of taxes, doesn't that make it relevant to the calculation? It may not be a 'royal expense' but it's a privilege given to a few because of the Sovereign's birthday. How do you think people who aren't civil servants feel about that? Why are they paying for me to have the day off?I didn't know that, but every country has public holidays, mostly for slightly spurious reasons. Certainly in Australia we have a Queen's birthday holiday.
Slight non sequitur to assume it's a royal expense.
I suppose it is. It just popped into my head so I thought to mention it before I forget.Is that a new thread title suggestion? If not, it should be.![]()
You. Are. Soooo. Talented!
It’s suppose to be a drama, isn’t it? I laughed so hard watching just the clips except the car crash one of course that was disgusting.When I first clicked on this I thought it was a sketch from a comedy program and kept waiting for the punch line.
I don't think it will ever get old!That is the gift that keeps on giving![]()
Oh heckNow THIS is worth an evening spent down a rabbit hole!!
What a find you absolute![]()
Same, I'm useless lolI'm no better - I've only ever suggested one thread title and that was about three posts before the end of a thread so nobody had time to vote on it. Have to admit I'm not that good at thinking them up so will leave it to those are.
Nowt like getting in early with your suggestion @Xales , hope it pays offPrince Pothead & Princess Pinocchio is my title suggestion.
Sorry, def not "fine" in any shape or form.Fine, provided she gets the memo that a children's book is supposed to appeal to CHILDREN and help to educate/illuminate CHILDREN...not the Sussex Squaddie parent who buys it, and not the navel-gazing illiterate hack who writes it.
Thankfully he has xIf he’s been double jabbed he will probably only get a mild case.
Wishing him a speedy recovery x
Definitely not. Far too harsh of a response. 'Grey rock' has served us well, long may it last.I think the answer should be an official and direct from the horse's mouth "its a hard "no" from One due to the source of several leaks and dangerous fabrications having been confirmed - but will not be named except it wasnt PP or One"
Petty but fuck them
Surprising Kris Jenner didn't come up with that first!Brandmother..... that is a typo to end all typos. Off to the trademark office to get it copyrighted asap
I can't find anything that even somewhat corroborates thisSo this was up on TMZ for a hot minute as well?
View attachment 751038