Harry and Meghan #134 Wallis and Vomit, supposedly speechless but still have to comment

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
According to the authors of Finding Freedom, the couple were “furious” when they discovered the photographer had been tipped off about their presence at the medical centre

The photos in this article published in July.

And to save you a click this is the photos they're angry about

View attachment 730252
Why is she wearing a white dress after a miscarriage? Isn't there bleeding after that?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 44
According to the authors of Finding Freedom, the couple were “furious” when they discovered the photographer had been tipped off about their presence at the medical centre

The photos in this article published in July.

And to save you a click this is the photos they're angry about

View attachment 730252

I've never even seen these pictures or heard about them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
Latest on 'the epilogue'!!

EXCLUSIVE - Harry and Meghan 'considered naming royal racist who asked about Archie's skin colour' in Oprah interview that the Duchess found 'cathartic' and 'liberating', new biography chapter claims


Thread title suggestion:

Harry & Meghan #135 Nothing new to say. Rinse & repeat, it’s Groundhog Day!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 60
Even funnier:
Shoe Size

7 (US) or 37.5 (EU

So for us in the UK she's a shoe size 5.
Bollocks she is.

All I can think of here is that if men's shoes correlate to the size of their Richmond, then what would her shoes correlate to?
I would take those sizes with a boulder-size grain of salt. It’s not just the sizes in that article that seem wrong; it also included these little nuggets:

Spouse
William Stewart (twice; divorced 2011 and 2013)

Religion
She has experimented with Scientology in the past.

Who the hell is William Stewart?!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 27
Just seen this

Enough of this 'spectacle' crap. Does Scabies really think that HW would have been the centre of attention at the funeral? It's pretty much always the deceased who is the centre of attention! Plus when the Queen is there, no one else has any attention. I honestly don't even think HW was invited, Harry must have been given strict orders for it to only be him.

It seems like HW is going to push for William to be the 'racist' in the royal family since Scabies is saying that he was furious that it was discussed in the public domain. She's probably still hoping that she'll become Queen one day :rolleyes:
What is going on? Where is the DM getting this from? Is it Scabie poo? Because it all seems to be a repeat of what was said at the time of the Orca interview and PP funeral. I guess he has nothing new to say to make them relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
Anyone else catch the retweet from murky Meg about a possible reason why we don't have any photos of the second cash cow?!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 24
I'd like to know how they spent the day with people involved in the ceremony! Doesn't lockdown mean no socialising?
And that doesn't say guests. It says " people involved" - the butcher? The baker? The cleaner? The preacher? Or the choir?
I think it was only the cali2, dorito and the farchie doll.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 19
Anyone else catch the retweet from murky Meg about a possible reason why we don't have any photos of the second cash cow?!
I went and had a look and I think it's a pretty crazy idea. Why would they have a surrogate without using their own donor material? And neither of them looks that way at all. Harry has had to deal with rumours of his father not being his father most of his life, which really must have been incredibly difficult.
I don't believe that Harry is deep down as much of a bleep as Meghan and I doubt he would support the idea of a baby who looks nothing like either parent.
And Meghan actually is a total bleep and doubt she would risk having a baby of unknown provenance - what if she were morbidly obese or very unattractive? Meghan would have to throw the baby in the bin. It's not like you can order Dakota or Elle Fanning.

I think there is definitely something very, very weird about the Lillbet situation but I don't think that's it.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 36
According to the authors of Finding Freedom, the couple were “furious” when they discovered the photographer had been tipped off about their presence at the medical centre

The photos in this article published in July.

And to save you a click this is the photos they're angry about

View attachment 730252
A white dress a couple of days after ‘giving birth’ and a white dress after a ‘miscarriage’! Ummm

Can someone please nominate Jameela Jamil?
I really want to vote for her.
Apart from the fact that someone would have to pay, I think The Grifties are an American thing, so I doubt anyone there has heard of her.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 32
Ugh so plasic bleep face Scrotie thinks that naming the royal 'racist' is going to bring down the monarchy. The Harkles seem to think that people care about their lies and anything written by the melt 😆

There are people right now in actual grave danger and these two have the audacity and ignorance to whinge.
They are so tone deaf they need hearing aids.🦻

Anyway if they go ahead and accuse someone (Charles or William) I'm sure the person in question will fight back with a claim for 'defamation' against them.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 44
She's a narcissist. She doesn't care about the heritage, the nations, & the history of the UK or the US, or any way of life besides what SHE wants. She is an embarrassment to the good people of both nations.
Just saw a good American article from Washington Post...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 39
Ugh so plasic bleep face Scrotie thinks that naming the royal 'racist' is going to bring down the monarchy. The Harkles seem to think that people care about their lies and anything written by the melt 😆

There are people right now in actual grave danger and these two have the audacity and ignorance to whinge.
They are so tone deaf they need hearing aids.🦻

Anyway if they go ahead and accuse someone (Charles or William) I'm sure the person in question will fight back with a claim for 'defamation' against them.
This is exactly why they don’t name them. Some vague accusation has everyone looking at everyone. It’s an easy accusation to make as many will believe it.
Now they’re rewriting the ‘dentist’ appointment as a pap attack. I wonder how Backgrid knew they were there? 🙄
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 37
Ugh so plasic bleep face Scrotie thinks that naming the royal 'racist' is going to bring down the monarchy. The Harkles seem to think that people care about their lies and anything written by the melt 😆

There are people right now in actual grave danger and these two have the audacity and ignorance to whinge.
They are so tone deaf they need hearing aids.🦻

Anyway if they go ahead and accuse someone (Charles or William) I'm sure the person in question will fight back with a claim for 'defamation' against them.

This might be where the reports of the Palace "lawyering up" has come from, ie, the Royal Family's solicitors will sue for libel/slander if they name the person who made alleged racist comments.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 29
H&M said the racist was between 50 & 100 after the Oprah farce.

Are they going to say they lied to protect Prince William?

Can't believe anything they say really.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: 29
That's cos cats are sneaky nasty lil cunts.


Rotties are fabulous.


Jesus, what a herd of ugly bastards. Go get a bleeping job ya cunts.
Sorry but this shower just make me want to buy a diesel 4 x 4 and a wood burning stove 😡
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 27
It is fascinating , how easy media gets away with a bit of deniability , facts and logic be damned.
"..Finding Freedom, the authors claim that several members of the royal family were “understood to have been ‘quietly pleased’” that Meghan did not attend because they “didn’t want a circus” or, as one senior royal source said, “the Duchess creating a spectacle”.
One bit that is certainly wrong ......'several members of the royal family' ............. surely that should be 'ALL members of the royal family'?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 28

I’ve just noticed it says this: “The book alleges that palace courtiers had lied to the media over Meghan and Harry's wishes on the issue of Archie not being made a prince, claiming that the couple did in fact want this option”. Harry ought to have known his place. How on earth can he think his children are of an equal status to William’s children? Plus his father’s plans to slim down the monarchy have been known for decades. I’m sure they all loved Archie but H&M were upset that he wasn’t getting equal treatment (i.e. a princely title) like the Cambridge children.

I still think that HW is the driving force behind all of this but Haz is definitely a willing participant. He’ll do anything to make her happy. They think they’ve got the Queen in their back pocket. That’s why in the Oprah interview they made some stupid claim about the Queen not being able to make her own decisions when she’s the head of the nation. It’s been mentioned before that HW thinks that with her false accusations via Scobie she can get Harry as regent after the Queen dies. Harry is probably in on this plan too hence saying his father and brother are “trapped”.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 37
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.