Anyone got any screenshots of the comments on Owen Jones last tweet of misogyny.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Right in the non binaries 
But. . . . but . . . but . . . how does that help?
We all knows that wimminz can have willies as well as men can have willies. And men can have foo-foos just the same as wimminz can have foo-foos. Because . . .
. . . well, you know . . . SCIENCE!They must have educated themselves out of bigotry. That's all I can think.
You'd think on a judge's salary he could afford to get his teeth straightened instead of wasting his money on fake bits and lipstick.
ETA - clicked on your link. Interesting reading. And I notice that he describes himself as "Dr" Victoria McCloud. We all know that a doctorate can apply to almost any area of study, but the immediate link in most minds is with medicine/ science. To my mind, using it is an attempt to give him a spurious credibility when he's talking about medical/scientific topics.
A couple of his tweets on the same thread. Seriously though the guy needs to get a job that actually occupies his time, he can't do much else other than posting endlessly about the trans debate and Palestine.
Attachments
If I found sh!t like this in my kid's party bags I'd go off it! And I'd be demanding my money back, too.
That's disgraceful!
He's such an insufferable wick (yes, I know this isn't an intelligent or well thought out argument, but ask yourself, am I wrong?)
Missed it yesterday but there was a motion to sack Maggie Chapman, the swivel eyed loon, from holyrood‘s equalities committee. It was defeated and bizarrely she was allowed a vote!
I find it hard to understand why a panel of judges who have in front of them a complex and highly controversial piece of legislation which they need to clarify and explain - a process which took several months and resulted in an 80 page judicial comment - knowing that whatever conclusions they reached were going to be vigorously contested - where was I? Oh, yes.
. . .I can't understand why this panel of judges tasked with this incredibly sensitive commission wouldn't want to listen to random ars£holes wittering on putting their twopenn'orth in about how it's going to stop them having a wee when they pop out to the shops and get caught short. It seems very bigoted and uneducated to me.
What a self-important little twit.
ETA
As you can see, I had similar intellectual reasoning when I phrased my comment.
These people simply cannot comprehend how much more intelligent than them these judges are. It’s beyond their level of understanding (see KS’s Twitter post linked above). They are just thick.
Who is denying trans people the right to exist, as per the plaintive cry in those tweets? (Which read like a 16 year old has written them straight after English lit class)
That’s not the issue here at all, is it?? They can happily exist in their own spaces.
The "erasure" hysterics are toddler-level logic - they hide their eyes and say "you can't see me!" They only "exist" in the mirror of other people's validation, and they have such tantrums when it's taken away.
It's like they've literally never met a woman.
All the older women in my family have always had short hair, I've never seen one of them in makeup and they all dress practically because they're working class women doing jobs like cleaning and care work that require them to move around.
Not one of them has ever been mistaken for a fella. I genuinely never saw my lovely mum wear makeup or have hair past her ears a single time in my entire 4 decades of life.
They tell on themselves when they talk about "performing femininity". Because they think that's what indicates someone is female, we must all be operating with their deranged standards.
The face will suffice thanks
They played the long game. Starting with Hayley Cropper (TRA's drank in the same pub as the Corrie writers to get the character written in), then in schools. If you grow up being fed lies, you will not only believe them, you will willingly promote them. These kids now unwittingly, promote the trans and woke agenda through the companies and organisations they work for. The fact that all government and local government institutions not only welcomed these flakes, but actively invited them in, shows just how much of a long game they played. Once TRA organisations (Stonewall, Mermaids, GLAAD, HRC etc) started putting the pressure on for inclusion, these well placed patsies automatically advocated for them and shamed those who spoke out against their cause. That is a very big part of the why and how this all happened.I expected a lot of reverse-ferreting from companies but of course we should have expected entrenched misogyny to lash out at us. The public institutions that are still lashing out terrifies me, amd makes me realise they really are actually captured and not necessarily just virtue signalling. If they were just the latter, they'd have shrugged their woke cape off so easily and gone 'oh well the law is the law, we will comply'.
How have we got to the point where we are supposed to fear for the safety of precious protect-them-at-all-costs-stunning-bwwwwave men, over the safety of women and girls?!
Looks like a poor man's impersonation of Deirdre Barlow.
(No offence to the late, great Anne Kirkbride who played Deirdre!)
Last edited:
- Status