- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I'm banned from Xitter - I hope she posts on Youtube.
I get so angry when people say Women should boycott. No we bleeping shouldn't. These Women have dedicated their lives for this moment. The sports authorities should be protecting the integrity of their sport. They are failing us and the only way they can be held to account is for their failings to be shown on one of the biggest sporting stages in the world.
Women have stood aside for Men since time began, it needs to stop.
Women have stood aside for Men since time began, it needs to stop.
I would like a full and public inquiry as to the amount of money spent on such pointless virtue signalling and the reasoning behind it. I can't see any whatsoever.
And the NHS is underfunded? No it isn't, it is full of useless managers, paper pushers and activists. Get rid of all them and get back to what you are intended to do.
...And repeal Annex B!
Yesterday, Peter Tatchell in the Tate; today, Sam Smith in the National Portrait Gallery (in the ‘History Makers’ section, no less 
)
www.bbc.co.uk
ETA: who next? Himdia in the Royal Academy?
)
Sam Smith painting unveiled at London's National Portrait Gallery
The singer says it is a "dream come true " to have the work by Pierre et Gilles put on display.
www.bbc.co.uk
ETA: who next? Himdia in the Royal Academy?
Given the levels of success a man wearing a dress can achieve, I think it's time I branched out. I am a woman but what if I suddenly moved to a new area, declared I am, in fact, a trans woman and then reaped the rewards of being stunning and brave? No one could say anything would they? they could hardly come up to me and say 'but you don't look like a trans woman!' as it would expose the Emperor's new clothes.
I feel sick about the male boxers that have been cleared to fight against women in the Olympics. Absolutely sick.
THIS!
In spades!
Women and girls have protested until they are blue in the face - and got precisely nowhere. It seems that our voices are so high that only bats and dogs can hear us.
We need the sports bodies to stand up for women athletes - and not just at elite level. From the very first sports day in primary school, the playing field needs to be levelled out. MEN should NOT be taking women's trophies and scholarships. They should NOT be invading the privacy of changing rooms and showers. Women don't want it, but have been bullied, blackmailed and coerced into accepting it.
And not only should the sports bodies be protecting women - so should men. Male athletes at elite level should speak out about this. Never mind telling women "You have to take part or we'll make sure you get cancelled - and we don't care if you get injured or even killed; we don't care if you are being subjected to what is effectively a sexual assault every time you go into the changing room; we don't care that you are at a disadvantage biologically and physiologically. These terribly vulnerable stunning and brave mediocre male athletes who wouldn't have a hope in hell of winning a medal are much more important than you are, because 'MAN' !"
None of this is about that old chestnut (cue sobbing TW "athlete") "We just want to take part in the sport we love" - if that was the reason they'd compete in their SEX class, or in the OPEN categories that some sports have tried to introduce (and which have been dismal failures because TW don't want them .) This is about WINNING. It is about fetishism and misogyny. It is about bullying women into doing what they (men) want. This is about publicly beating and humiliating women.
I also think that male athletes should refuse to take part in any competition, or under any sports authority that won't protect female ones. It is only when the men kick off about the unfairness of it that anything will be done. Advertisers should refuse to sponsor the sports. It shouldn't be like this, but it is.
Otherwise by the next Olympics there likely won't be any women competing. It will be men's competitions, and mediocre men's competitions.
How many people are going to watch that?
How much money is going to get invested into the sports bodies to promote rubbish male athletes that nobody wants to see?
But the transmovement will be happy. If they can't get a medal, at least they've stopped women from succeeding.
---
I so hope that she isn't badly injured. She, and all women, deserve so much more than this rit.
I completely agree with every word.
I also have a mental image of a future line up of all the ‘trans usual suspects’ waiting for the 100m to start. They’ve pushed all the women out so it’s just a load of men dressed up as women. It would consist of a row of grotesque AGPs getting off on wearing the kit and having their long locks flowing in the wind as they run. The whistle blows and they all elbow each other out of the way to get in front, balls flapping and receding hairlines exposed.
Just over a hundred years ago boys under four years old had long hair and wore dresses. Didn't mean they necessarily identified as one thing or another!
God almighty.Yesterday, Peter Tatchell in the Tate; today, Sam Smith in the National Portrait Gallery (in the ‘History Makers’ section, no less
Sam Smith painting unveiled at London's National Portrait Gallery
The singer says it is a "dream come true " to have the work by Pierre et Gilles put on display.
ETA: who next? Himdia in the Royal Academy?
The state of it.
Actually, that's extremely flattering of him!God almighty.
The state of it.
They hate us. Dangerous bleeping pathetic men that hate us.
The British Medical Association are going to evaluate the Cass report. Sounds like they want to discredit it from what I can make out on X.
Yikes! Standards have really droppedYesterday, Peter Tatchell in the Tate; today, Sam Smith in the National Portrait Gallery (in the ‘History Makers’ section, no less
Sam Smith painting unveiled at London's National Portrait Gallery
The singer says it is a "dream come true " to have the work by Pierre et Gilles put on display.
ETA: who next? Himdia in the Royal Academy?
that place must house some truly exceptional portraits. Madame Tussauds would be a better place for Mr Smith.Where’s Just Stop Oil when you need them?Yesterday, Peter Tatchell in the Tate; today, Sam Smith in the National Portrait Gallery (in the ‘History Makers’ section, no less
Sam Smith painting unveiled at London's National Portrait Gallery
The singer says it is a "dream come true " to have the work by Pierre et Gilles put on display.
ETA: who next? Himdia in the Royal Academy?
Never mind prison, that w@nker should have been given the chair.
This 100%! It was the same thing last year with that Anne Coombes scenario. The receptionist gave him the key to the unisex room (which some of the TRAs online have said they’re fine with as a compromise because it’s still “inclusive”, like how toilets in public spaces are becoming unisex for “inclusion”) but no he kicked off because it had to be the WOMEN’S changing room and anything else was tRaNsPhObIc.
I’m so bored of them moving the goalposts “Yes we’re fine with open sports competitions/unisex toilets and changing facilities BUT ACTUALLY if you offer them you’re transphobic because you don’t view a man with badly applied lipstick and a terrible wig in a dress as a woman”. Clown world.
I'm a bit behind but I'm watching the gymnastics at the Olympics. Why do the men and women do different activities? Is it maybe cos men and womens bodies are different and have different strengths and weaknesses???
- Status