Archived version.Just seen
---
Also
Another win against the trans lobby shows why Starmer’s gender plans are all wrong
Before Labour makes self-identification easier, they should consider the nightmare that unfolded at an Edinburgh rape centrewww.telegraph.co.uk
Glad to see Suzanne Moore writing again on this issue. She was treated appallingly by the Guardian.Archived version.
Another win against the trans lobby shows why Starmer's gender plans …
archived 21 May 2024 11:26:34 UTCarchive.ph
They're all delusional. "Trans identified" is the only way to describe these people without descending into unintelligible doublespeak gobbkedegook. Which is of course exactly what they want.Just seen
---
Also
Another win against the trans lobby shows why Starmer’s gender plans are all wrong
Before Labour makes self-identification easier, they should consider the nightmare that unfolded at an Edinburgh rape centre
Fucks Sake she looksike an Obese Su Pollard with those wacky Glasses. What Parent would want that around their toddler
Why the massive sword pendants swinging from her glasses? Honestly the lunatics have taken over the asylum.
I don't care what woman does at the weekend but when she's doing her job she should conform for the sake of the children. Letting them call her Miss isn't a big problem. It's sickening that she's obsessed with her identity over the needs of the children who will be confused. I certainly wouldn't be happy if she was teaching my children.
First world problems, what a total idiot. Would not want her teaching my kids.
How about hand your notice in before you’ve even started - imagine worrying about how you’re going to indoctrinate and confuse the minds of 4 years olds with your weird, perverted gender ideology. Yet another reason why I home educate my kids
You know who did wear chanel no5? Marilyn Monroe. So his idea of femininity is again seen through the male gaze.
I’m pretty sure my head teacher would have spoken to me about wearing swords to school, it’s not appropriate! These people are pure narcissists and should be nowhere near the education of children!
reduxx.info
It would explain why judges are letting men who download vast amounts of CSA images, walk out of court. Every single week brings another case of a man who "acted out of character" (I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but I really do think there is a concerted effort at the moment to sexualise children, tear down boundaries around child safeguarding and blur consent. Let’s be honest, members of PIE never went away, they just resorted to other means to try to circumvent those who stand in their way. Take this bill voted in last week by members of the German parliament to decriminalise the possession of child SA images.
"Pro-Pedophile" Activist Group Celebrates As Germany Decriminalizes Child Porn Possession - Reduxx
Germany’s Parliament (Bundestag) has received the votes necessary to remove a section of the Criminal Code which made the possession of child sexual abuse materials a felony crime. Once the bill, passed last Thursday, comes into effect, minimum sentences for the possession of child pornography...
Once the bill comes into effect, minimum sentences for the possession of child pornography will be reduced, and the offense will be downgraded to a misdemeanor.
How can any reasonable-thinking adult consider the possession of such images a ‘misdemeanour‘? The article cites a well-known German CSA consumer who is advocating for the age of consent to be lowered to 12. Peter Tatchell anyone? The links between gender ideology and the sexualisation of children are there for all to see, yet the juggernaut keeps moving forward with no one in power taking any serious steps to stop it.
) after being found with thousands of images on their devices, yet very, very few of these men are ever jailed.
There is a non-binary teacher at my niece's school who insists on being called "Mx Hername". To be fair, she always looks quite cheerful and jolly, but there's a definite touch of the Su Pollards about her. Something a bit childish and attention-seeky.
Stopped my angry react to a sick after reading that article. Thinking politicians should apologise to people who have suffered because of this law, and calling for paedophile including todflers to be acceptableI’m not one for conspiracy theories, but I really do think there is a concerted effort at the moment to sexualise children, tear down boundaries around child safeguarding and blur consent. Let’s be honest, members of PIE never went away, they just resorted to other means to try to circumvent those who stand in their way. Take this bill voted in last week by members of the German parliament to decriminalise the possession of child SA images.
"Pro-Pedophile" Activist Group Celebrates As Germany Decriminalizes Child Porn Possession - Reduxx
Germany’s Parliament (Bundestag) has received the votes necessary to remove a section of the Criminal Code which made the possession of child sexual abuse materials a felony crime. Once the bill, passed last Thursday, comes into effect, minimum sentences for the possession of child pornography...
Once the bill comes into effect, minimum sentences for the possession of child pornography will be reduced, and the offense will be downgraded to a misdemeanor.
How can any reasonable-thinking adult consider the possession of such images a ‘misdemeanour‘? The article cites a well-known German CSA consumer who is advocating for the age of consent to be lowered to 12. Peter Tatchell anyone? The links between gender ideology and the sexualisation of children are there for all to see, yet the juggernaut keeps moving forward with no one in power taking any serious steps to stop it.
