I do genuinely appreciate you taking the time to write a long reply and provide information on your opinion.
I can see that you feel passionately about this and I do completely agree that being female is real and meaningful. I absolutely agree that persistent female oppression is something that needs to be fought against and I do stand for and by women.
This wasn't you but someone else looked through my previous posts and mentioned comments I'd made about women and their bodies. I'd like to clarify that the context of this is a woman glorifying an eating disorder to impressionable followers, which I believe is dangerous and wrong.
Anyway, back to the point. While I do agree with some of the things you said and appreciate you putting them across eloquently, everyone here can see there is a lot I don't agree with. I personally don't think protecting women and their rights should involve negativity towards orders who aren't female.
Someone said 'take your own advice luv' but these sorts of things do concern me because they are prevalent in society today and, really, I want to be an ally to everyone, including fellow women, but I guess it aways will clash with someone's opinions.
I definitely didn't approach this in the right way - you're right I did jump on a post with no context and I also was unnecessary hostile. I apologise for that. It's hard to see things being expressed that don't align with my own beliefs and morals but such is life!
I do think as others have said this isn't the thread for me. I think everyone here is united in their beliefs, many of which contradict mine and I think are strongly held beliefs that can't be shifted. It doesn't feel great to be laughed at for expressing my thoughts but maybe I brought that on myself by the way I expressed myself.
Thank you for the thoughtful reply, and rest assured that the tone of my response was only responding in kind to your own and not meant as an attack on you either. I am here yes, to gossip, but also to debate freely one of the few places that allows it, and to listen to people I don’t always agree with.
Please believe me that I mean absolutely no ill-will to anyone living as they please, far from it. I believe very fiercely that anyone can dress, act, present, call themselves whatever they want. I’m all for it. They can live and love as they wish and I’m extremely proud to live in a country that allows this. I would strongly stand up for anyone who was attacked for being “different.”
My minor griping about Mae not rushing to clear up any confusion Mae isn’t actually a
les aside, my issue with isn’t with any individual person so much as the idea that we all have to adopt an ideology that I and others personally do not agree with, in order to refer to others. In pretty much no other field I am required to actively agree with another person’s subjective view of themselves, and the world, if I don’t want to. Mae is perfectly within her rights to consider herself not female if that’s important to her, but I don’t have to do this. I wouldn’t go and yell in Mae’s face about that, but I would discuss it in this forum.
If it was just using the right pronoun, that would be one ask. But pronouns are part of a bigger system. “It’s just asking to be called X or Y, what is the problem?” The problem is this can be just the first step. It then becomes a request (framed as a demand) that we observe more than just politeness, and so observe a person’s identity in law, in sports, in male / female spaces, and begin to promote the idea to children that we all have a “gender identity” (this is no more true than we all have a religion).
To be clear, anyone is free to believe what they want, do what they want, believe what they want about themselves — simply not to impose it on me. And when it has practical, real-world impact, some of us will ask questions. I’m allowed to ask whether, for example, recommending to others microdosing with testosterone (as Mae has done) is a good thing to do. I’m also allowed to wonder if the recent promotion of elective top surgery / double mastectomy is really that empowering. If this is seen as negativity… well, I won’t single Mae out again I don’t think but simply I don’t think children and young women need to get these messages all the time that feeling different means medical intervention. If “non-binary” as an identity was just a pronouns request, I would find it daft but I wouldn’t feel so strongly that it’s actually a little dangerous. It’s not just a pronouns request.