Webberley is an absolute goon, but actually, more than that, utterly evil. I loathe Hartley Brewer in a lot of ways but hats off to her on her gender critical stance and she certainly handed HW a new hole.
There's a very good book called Black Box Thinking that goes into the way the health profession versus the aviation sector deal with mistakes. Due to a culture of blame (and arrogance), the health profession covers things up and issues persist/get worse. Whereas in aviation, there is a culture of accountability. Whenever mistakes are made, they're looked upon as learning opportunities and blame isn't cast, therefore issues are dealt with and improved upon.Any mistakes that might be made, could perhaps be fixed , if people are honest enough to admit to them.
I've been meaning to read that for a while, thanks for the reminderThere's a very good book called Black Box Thinking that goes into the way the health profession versus the aviation sector deal with mistakes. Due to a culture of blame (and arrogance), the health profession covers things up and issues persist/get worse. Whereas in aviation, there is a culture of accountability. Whenever mistakes are made, they're looked upon as learning opportunities and blame isn't cast, therefore issues are dealt with and improved upon.
Self-pitying little mit that he is. He disgusts me.Just seen this
I'm way behind on these threads but I have also come to write about the report as also saw this in the glossary. And "birthing people" appears 101 timesYesterday the Amos report into Maternity and Neonatal Services in England was finally published after a series of maternity scandals, where women and babies suffered trauma, prompted an investigation.
Page 1 of the report
View attachment 4040886
From Annex 1
View attachment 4040889
Throughout the report, there is reference to ‘women and birthing people’. The only ‘people’ who use maternity services are women. They are trying to justify the use of ‘birthing people’ as a term to be inclusive to the ‘LGBTQIA+’ community but it’s utter bull. Plenty of les women have children and they are not excluded by the term ‘women’. So really it’s about ideological pandering to make sure there is no backlash from TRAs - in a report which focuses on harm experienced by women.
Oh, they can duck themselves in the face.I'm way behind on these threads but I have also come to write about the report as also saw this in the glossary. And "birthing people" appears 101 times
View attachment 4041047View attachment 4041049View attachment 4041050
I've worked in maternity services in a large, extremely busy and oversubscribed London hospital, for almost two decades. I've met les couples, gay men with surrogate babies, I've seen several babies with probable DSD's, I've met mothers and fathers from every corner of the globe. I've never met a single pregnant transman. Nor have I ever met a transwoman father (I'm tying myself in knots here!I'm way behind on these threads but I have also come to write about the report as also saw this in the glossary. And "birthing people" appears 101 times
View attachment 4041047View attachment 4041049View attachment 4041050
I've been following this case on the MN thread about it. It's bleeping ludicrous, but unfortunately the judge doesn't seem wholly impartial
Is this another of Naomi Cunningham cases? If so keep going girl and tell the judge to give their head a shake there is a malfunction going on. Can’t believe that clever folk have falling for this
It is, also following on mumsnet. NC pretty disdainful of the judgeIs this another of Naomi Cunningham cases? If so keep going girl and tell the judge to give their head a shake there is a malfunction going on. Can’t believe that clever folk have falling for this![]()
I'm English speaking and I'm not sure what these terms mean or what the global majority is. I know I can Google them but they are using language that would confuse most people. They're so out of touch with reality.I've never met a single pregnant transman. Nor have I ever met a transwoman father (I'm tying myself in knots here!).
This report is so keen to use "inclusive" language, but this is pandering to a tiny, tiny minority of service users. They use terms like "black and Asian women", or the latest favourite, "global majority"
This is menopausal transwoman Samantha Tempest
Instead of calling non-white women "ethnic minorities", they have come up with the more accurate term "global majority", as when combined, the number of women who are ethnically African, Caribbean or Asian, are a majority in the world population. It's important to categorise women correctly in healthcare settings as we know that different ethnicities have different risk factors during their lives, and especially during pregnancy. However, the endlessly changing terminology is all very well, and it's lovely that we aren't offending anyone, but it's not dealing with the actual problems of poorer pregnancy outcomes for black and Asian women.I'm English speaking and I'm not sure what these terms mean or what the global majority is. I know I can Google them but they are using language that would confuse most people. They're so out of touch with reality.