This is so spot on. Clearly the irony of it doesn't even register with her. Of course all parents deserve a break and everyone needs a night out/day off now and then but she constantly leaves them and it just beggars belief that she would go to a mummy event to preach about parenting I'm guessing whilst her baby is sick.The irony of “Off to a mummy event” when her baby has chicken pox, and her husband’s away. Wow they really are parents of the year. How dare her babies get in the way of her social life. Yawn.
I was thinking same thing werent they about a month early? But even so they should be doing more those bath seats are for babies under 6months and she is a prize bellendMillion percent not defending the fopp but does it make any difference that they were early? Like by corrected age they aren't quite as old as they are by DOB. So mayyyybe they aren't quite at the sitting up unaided stage and flipping over like mad? My son was due almost the same day as them and he's only just started sitting up properly unaided and in the last few weeks he went mental flipping all over the place and backward bum shuffling. Maybe they're just not quite there based on corrected age? I dunno. Like I say, not defending her at all, she really pickles my cheese but god knows it's bloody hard this mumlife so just thought I'd throw it out there?!
35 weeks.What gestation were they born at?
So not really early then cos 37 weeks is term for twins35 weeks.
Sorry i didn’t realise I’d stumbled into an obstetrics forum or babycentre FFSIt is early to be fair, any baby born before 37 weeks is rightly so premature. Knock her for anything but not science and facts
It’s literally the most basic information on birth everSorry i didn’t realise I’d stumbled into an obstetrics forum or babycentre FFS
My eldest was earlier than he should be by about that amount of time and he was doing everything he was meant to be doing by the time he was 8 months. So I think it is a case of lazy parenting rather than anything else.To be fair they were premature then, so 5 weeks early. So you would correct them by that. I don’t think we should snark on that personally
It’s literally the most basic information on birth eversorry it’s too highbrow for you
Even if you count them as 5 weeks prem it would still make their corrected age as like 8 months? I agree yes they were early - my twins were born at 36 weeks so early aswellOh I’m not doubting she’s a lazy parent at all, she very much is. It’s just when people want opinion over fact it’s a bit dumb
I wasn’t sure if their actual age to be honestEven if you count them as 5 weeks prem it would still make their corrected age as like 8 months? I agree yes they were early - my twins were born at 36 weeks so early aswell
That’s brilliant, it’s not easy My youngest was early & struggled in the beginning couldn’t bf, really struggled with bottles etc but he thrived eventually when he could eat food he walked at 10 monthsMy sister’s twin girls were born at 34 weeks weighing 3.5 lbs each. With love, attention & encouragement from us all they reached their milestones the same as other full-term babies the same age. It’s entirely possible.
True but even when they reach a certain stage, there are basic things they should be doing for that stage. At 8 months whether they're early or not, rolling over and sitting up should be something that they're able to do.I don’t think it’s fair to compare babies, they all develop in their own time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?