Wait, so Abbie has an autism diagnosis and that's it? Did they never need to get an updated diagnosis or anything for the purpose of helping ABbie to the best of her ability? I don't understand this at all. Wouldn't JSA have wanted to know about different testing so they could best help her? Is this a regular thing?
There is literally zero chance that "autism" is her only official medical diagnosis.
My assumption is that they refused to allow formal medical evaluation for an intellectual disability diagnosis at least until recently, and if she's had the evaluation done it would have only been because it was required for the guardianship process.
That's what he meant when he was blabbering in the pool about Abbie not having a developmental disability diagnosis - "developmental disability" itself isn't a diagnosis, it's an umbrella term that encompasses a number of diagnoses. ADHD is a developmental disability. Cerebral Palsy is a developmental disability. Spina bifida is a developmental disability. Autism spectrum disorder is a developmental disability, or, more narrowly, an Intellectual and Developmental Disability (IDD). Of course she wouldn't have a
diagnosis of developmental disability/IDD. They're not diagnoses. Asa was using a little smug wordplay to maintain his narrative.
There are other diagnoses often made in the absence of something like an ASD or intellectual disability diagnosis in situations where they can't yet diagnose the main issue or if the parents don't cooperate. For example, in the long process leading up to my younger child's autism diagnosis they were given a diagnosis of Stereotypy. Our neurologist observed stereotyped behaviors (stimming) and added Stereotypy - the medical term for stimming - to child's medical records. There were a couple other symptom diagnoses listed as well until we got through the wait lists and evaluations and an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis was given.
Abbie was, according to Asa, given a "global developmental delay" diagnosis. That's one of those stand-in diagnoses where doctors can't yet diagnose an ID on a young child. If, as it appears, they wouldn't allow medical evaluation for an intellectual disability she likely has other stand-in diagnoses like Cognitive Deficit/Cognitive Impairment, Deficits in Adaptive Behavior, Borderline Intellectual Functioning, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, and so on. Asa just doesn't admit to any of that - likely even to themselves let alone publicly.
In terms of schooling & JSA, that's a bit more complicated.
When she was in public school she would have been given what's called
educational diagnoses for any issues related to her schooling. An educational diagnosis is only relevant to school. Insurance doesn't care about it, SSA doesn't care about it, public (and most private) programs don't care about it; it's only relevant to the school setting. As an example: I have a family member who entered kindergarten with major delays in many areas. Their parents were (and are) in denial, didn't believe in "labeling" a child, etc etc so they had never sought medical or early intervention help. This child is
clearly mildly autistic and needed quite a bit of support once they entered school. The parents agreed to an IEP and the recommended in-school therapies but declined seeking any medical evaluations. This child has several educational diagnoses including speech or language impairment, other health impairment, and specific learning disability but they have no diagnoses on their medical records with their pediatrician beyond Anxiety. Abbie would have been given any of a number of educational diagnoses including all the above I listed + autism + maybe intellectual disability (they moved her to JSA when she was young so it's possible the school didn't settle on ID yet).
Asa already looks down on educated people like doctors and he has a personal grudge against Duval County schools so he's going to ignore any educational diagnoses they gave her.
What complicates things is that JSA is not a public school. It's a private school. That means it isn't bound by the federal IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act) law like public schools are. They don't have to follow (or issue) IEPs, they don't have to follow or issue educational diagnoses, they can kinda just do what they want. Was JSA
fully aware of Abbie's level of functioning? Absolutely. But they're a business - all private schools are - and their primary concern is collecting tuition so if Abbie never got formal medical evaluations done beyond her initial autism diagnoses 16 years ago that isn't a dealbreaker. They don't need it, and they're not bound by any laws to have it. They did their own evaluations on her and provided the education they felt was appropriate.