Exactly!! I’ve been to one off 90 minute baby events (lol events like she’s doing Glasto 2023) where I’ve had to read through the same lengthy GDPR/photography policies I did when I enrolled her in nursery! It’s taken so seriously now thankfully that you can only assume parents that haven’t clocked this issue must actually be thick as tit.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
So glad I caught up on this thread after it dropped off my watched list, although can’t say I’m sorry to have missed FOD and his mankini (Axa, I love you and you’ve given me nightmares in equal measures).
And RainyL getting namechecked in the Vitamin D projects actual Instagram bio! Howling
For all these influencers talk of being strong, independent women, they’re so terribly thin skinned.
And RainyL getting namechecked in the Vitamin D projects actual Instagram bio! Howling
For all these influencers talk of being strong, independent women, they’re so terribly thin skinned.When he was talking about the TV stand and tvs I bet he was hankering after one of the sky glass tvs that other people have been gifted. Even thelongmum has had one gifted bet he hates that
The excerpt below is from the book "Media Law for Journalists", chapter 2.9 "A child's right to privacy" re: an appeal case.
It is about children being photographed by paparazzi, but touches on a couple of things such as a child having a greater expectation of privacy than an adult in day to day life, a child's right to privacy being distinct (though not entirely separate) from that of the parents, and parental conduct and motive being a consideration in whether an interference of privacy is justified. Just posting this as general food for thought.
What I feel we are missing (in society in general, not on here) is that many of the biggest threats to a child's privacy in the social media age come from people WITH parental responsibility.
It is about children being photographed by paparazzi, but touches on a couple of things such as a child having a greater expectation of privacy than an adult in day to day life, a child's right to privacy being distinct (though not entirely separate) from that of the parents, and parental conduct and motive being a consideration in whether an interference of privacy is justified. Just posting this as general food for thought.
What I feel we are missing (in society in general, not on here) is that many of the biggest threats to a child's privacy in the social media age come from people WITH parental responsibility.
Katty Perry's daughter and Anne Hathway's Son in articles today:
Last edited:
That article of course is also talking about photos taken by third persons in public. A child’s expectation of privacy in their own home should be considered even greater.
I like plants, but even this is too much for me. Why have one of something when you can 6? 
Last edited:
He’s staying very near to me at the moment. I’ll keep an eye out for a spotting in the wild. Had one a few years ago, which really threw me, as I thought I knew the kids, then realised who they were. Scary.
Is the misconduct her Tattle profile? Wasn't that in 2019?
The only doctor I've actually met who was struck off (but still employed by my school) was one who had been found guilty of molesting female coworkers. We only found out when someone googled him. Super nice and I didn't get any off vibes from him either which I'm normally good with.
You only get struck off for very serious cases, which would not be just down to the colour of your skin.
You only get struck off for very serious cases, which would not be just down to the colour of your skin.
Last edited:
I wonder how successful this investigation will be when Clemmie deleted her Instagram profile? And SO much content would have been via Instagram stories so only existed for 24 hour bursts anyway. There will inevitably be some stuff scattered across these threads & other social platforms, but Clemmie would rightly be able to say how do you know they’ve not been doctored?
Like that’s not me shitting on it as she’s clearly a danger to black women so needs striking off but I don’t believe they’ll manage to create a compelling enough case to do it.
Black doctors and nurses have been struck off for far less, but Clemmie is still being investigated and allowed to work!!
He contradicts himself. In stories he says 4 or 5 calls from M. On grid he says a solitary call from M.
This is a recent case: Sex acts at work.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Older case: Actions lead to death.
As she's still working it's because someone hasn't told her she has to stop.
Male midwife struck off nursing register for solo sex acts at work
Hull midwife Paul Johnson, pictured, repeatedly bullied junior staff and pleasured himself sexually while at work in Hull Women and Children's Hospital, a misconduct hearing has ruled.
Older case: Actions lead to death.
Midwife struck off for misconduct over baby deaths
In one case Heather Lort did not provide "effective resuscitation" to newborn Kate Stanton-Davies.
www.bbc.co.uk
As she's still working it's because someone hasn't told her she has to stop.
Last edited:
I can't believe how much of their precious 24 hours he spent making all that instagram content.
Well, actually I can
Well, actually I can
Ugh he’s so rank, as much as she is a twit she could do so much better than old man sly
She looks drained and sallow in that picture, and her hair is awful. Similar to how she looked in the group photo. The wart on her nose doesn’t help, Doesn’t hubby know how to photoshop?
Last edited:
Loved this one:
Thanks MUM. What women doesn't dream of being called mum by a partner?
Who wants to be filmed whilst in the bath?
Editing it all with captions too.
Thanks MUM. What women doesn't dream of being called mum by a partner?
Who wants to be filmed whilst in the bath?
I can't believe how much of their precious 24 hours he spent making all that instagram content.
Well, actually I can
Editing it all with captions too.
Last edited:
- Status