So do they only return to the UK to use the NHS resources?
YepSo do they only return to the UK to use the NHS resources?
She did mention having to pay the midwife full price even though she only got there when the baby was basically out! But I dont understand why they couldn't of done it in Dubai? Is it that they dont want him to be a citizen there?xI think they went completely private with Koa's birth. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Dubai doesn’t allow home births and wouldn’t have allowed the kids in the hospital room for the birth. They flew home so they could make money from their son from the second he was born.But I dont understand why they couldn't of done it in Dubai? Is it that they dont want him to be a citizen there?x
Agreed %!I am surprised this family doesn't have more posts here about their lifestyle choices and their ethics. They are constantly doing challenges for rewards worth thousands of dollars for mia and sienna and they avoid taxes by being " homeless" . But then they go back to the UK to have the baby , they say it's because the kids can't be involved in the birth in Dubai, but my understanding is as UK citizens it's free whereas it's a huge expense if they stayed in Dubai for the birth.
Every now and then I try and watch a vlog but quite frankly I think they are nearly as bad as the Inghams but in different ways.
They paid for private healthcare, I think the reason is that Georgie was for some reason traumatised by the hospital births she had. But I agree about the ethics thingI am surprised this family doesn't have more posts here about their lifestyle choices and their ethics. They are constantly doing challenges for rewards worth thousands of dollars for mia and sienna and they avoid taxes by being " homeless" . But then they go back to the UK to have the baby , they say it's because the kids can't be involved in the birth in Dubai, but my understanding is as UK citizens it's free whereas it's a huge expense if they stayed in Dubai for the birth.
Every now and then I try and watch a vlog but quite frankly I think they are nearly as bad as the Inghams but in different ways.
I believe that as they are vegans they think they are immune to all virus' etc. They think their lifestyle, eating healthy and being positive can keep them from being ill. I also believe they could be anit-vaccine too. I saw one of their videos where they went away during start of lockdown and laugjed as the receptionist gave them a leaflet about washing their hands etc. Ive said it before but veganism is a cult/religion. I dont believe in it at all, i dont mind vegetarians but vegans piss me off so much, especially these lot saying just eat healthy and you wont get ill. F off mateSorry for the double post. I assume most of you know about Family Freedom, with Jojo being Sienna's supposed "boyfriend". I looked on Bob's Facebook, and he's shared a post saying the lockdown isn't necessary, that the NHS are releasing false death tolls to scare people, and that coronavirus isn't a dangerous virus. He's also shared petitions campaigning against vaccines, and shared fake news saying a "coronavirus vaccine" (obviously doesn't exist yet) has killed 7 children. These people are insane, and if they're Family Fizz's only friends, then I'm willing to bet that Family Fizz haven't vaccinated their kids either. At least Family Fizz seem to be respecting lockdown.
Georgie and Darren shouldn’t allow it. Might be misremembering but didn’t someone say that Darren controls her content? It’s sickening if her parents are actually encouraging this. Mia might not be able to fully grasp the potential consequences but they should know betterdear god, how many times is Mia going to clickbait her being naked on her channel? I don't know how she gets away with those blurred images in the background of her thumbnails considering her channel is "family friendly content". I take serious issue with this, as the only reason she's done it is to get clicks from people who are looking to see young girls like that, and so her parents are putting her in a compromising position to make money
Isn't that Georgie though?dear god, how many times is Mia going to clickbait her being naked on her channel? I don't know how she gets away with those blurred images in the background of her thumbnails considering her channel is "family friendly content". I take serious issue with this, as the only reason she's done it is to get clicks from people who are looking to see young girls like that, and so her parents are putting her in a compromising position to make money
Went back to check and the video has been deleted. I wonder whyIsn't that Georgie though?
Chloe was jan 2018 , karma July 2018, so like 6 months? (Did google this btw)Whats the age difference between Karma and Chloe from DadVGirls? They seem a similar age but chloe seems alot more grown up where Karma still seems quite babyfied.